NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2011
BOARD MEMBERS POSTING LOCATIONS
Dee Gatliff,
Desert Breeze Community Center-8275
W.
John Getter Helen
Meyer Community Center-4525
Duane Laible, Vice Chair
Lee Plotkin West
Flamingo Senior Center-6255 W. Flamingo
Angie Heath Younce, Chair
Diana Morton, Secretary
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
III.
PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A.
Conformance with
the
B.
Meeting
Guidelines
C.
Liaison/County
Staff Business
D.
Approval of
Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
E.
Approval of
Minutes of
F.
Introduce
2011-2012 Bylaws
IV. PUBLIC INPUT Comments by the General Public and Discussion
No action may be taken
upon a matter raised under this
item of the agenda until the matter itself has been included on
the agenda. Public comment will
be limited to three (3) minutes.
V. PLANNING & ZONING
Action
to be taken on the following applications:
VI. Set next meeting date
***IF YOU PLAN ON BEING IN ATTENDANCE, IT IS
IMPORTANT TO BE ON TIME (6:20 PM ) IN CASE SOME ITEMS ARE HEARD OUT OF ORDER. THERE IS A CONFLICT OF HEARING WITH OTHER
TOWN BOARDS AND SOMETIMES THE APPLICANT HAS AN EMERGENCY.
COMMISSIONERS
SUSAN BRAGER, Chair STEVE SISOLAK,
Vice-Chair
Meeting Location: Desert Breeze Community Center
ATTACHMENT A
1.
CP-1081-10: That the Spring Valley Town Advisory Board accept public
comment on a proposed amendment to the Spring Valley Land Use Plan on the west
side of Rainbow Boulevard between Edna Avenue and Tara Avenue, then forward a
recommendation to the Clark County Planning Commission.
Staff presented this item to the TAB
with limited information available before the meeting. There were several
matters that troubled TAB members on this item. This represents a proposed
change in an area approved for RNP-1 overlay two weeks ago. At that time the
TAB and 80+ residents attending were assured there would be no proposed changes
to the overlay area. Two weeks later, this was a change. As the area in
question was limited, most of those 80+ who had supported the previous RNP vote
were NOT given any notice of the action. One protest appeared.
Staff acknowledged that the map
provided to the TAB two weeks ago was inaccurate and stated that the maps need
not be accurate. They had not provided any list of parcels under consideration
and so the TAB had only the map to make its decision, a map now acknowledged as
inaccurate. They further stated that maps need not be accurate as parcel lists
prevail, even when not provided to the TAB.
Staff inaccurately stated the above
action was part of the regular LUP update two years after the previous major
update which staff said occurred in 2008. The current map says it was adopted
on
Contrary to what staff said two weeks
earlier regarding the RNP1 overlay, they told TAB the overlay should not extend
across
Staff reported that only one parcel
owner requested this update and the inclusion of 5 additional parcels was added
by the staff.
Staff reported this brought the LUP
into line with current uses, but acknowledged that no change was required to
allow the property owners to continue to use their parcels as they currently
do.
TAB voted to approve 4-1. Two members
indicated they did so to allow for an appeal, two supported making the LUP
comply with current use, and one member voted no in light of his vote two weeks
earlier supporting the RNP-1 overlay.
2. NZC-0614-10
MICHAEL SCARPELLI JR & DENISE L. SCARPELLI FAMILY
TRUST:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) reduced setbacks; and 2) non-standard improvements. Generally located on the
north side of
Applicant stated this change was needed
as the market for previously approved mini-warehouse was dead. He predicted a
strong interest by home buyers selling three homes per month when completed.
TAB raised questions about the lack of open space, lot setbacks, driveway
placement and parking. TAB voted 4-1 to deny.
3. UC-0618-10
WARM SPRINGS
USE
PERMIT to allow on-premise
consumption of alcohol (service bar) in conjunction with a proposed restaurant
within an existing shopping center on a portion of 2.3 acres in a C-1 (Local
Business) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay District.
Generally located on the north side of
Approved 5-0
4. UC-1026-08
(ET-0196-10) HARMONY 19, LLC:
USE PERMIT SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME to commence modified
screening and development standards in conjunction with a single family
residential subdivision.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential subdivision on 18.0 acres in an R-3
(Multiple Family Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in
the Rhodes Ranch Master Planned Community.
Generally located on the north side of
Acknowledging
that extensions are normally routinely approved, a TAB member stated that the
conditions on this property had changed because the applicant is more than
$300,000 behind in paying taxes. Applicant acknowledged the arrears, but stated
the citizens were actually benefiting from this as interest was accruing that
would have to be paid before the project could actually begin. The TAB voted to
approve 3-2 with the condition that back taxes are paid in full BEFORE the
5. VS-1025-08
(ET-0198-10) HARMONY 19, LLC; ET AL:
VACATE
Same as item 4
6. WT-1027-08
(ET-0197-10) HARMONY 19, llc:
WAIVER SECOND EXTENSION OF
TIME to
commence modified improvement standards for a residential development on 18.0
acres in an R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay)
Zone in the Rhodes Ranch Master Planned Community. Generally located on the north side of
Same as items 4-5.
7. UC-0612-10 BHODHIYANA MEDITATION CENTER TRUST:
USE PERMIT for a place of worship.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1)
off-site improvements (including paving); 2) allow access to a local
street; 3) trash enclosure; 4) commercial curb return driveway; 5)
allow alternative buffer landscape requirements adjacent to a less intense use;
6) waive the requirement to screen existing mechanical equipment; and 7)
allow an existing overhead power lines.
DESIGN REVIEW for a place of worship on 1.0 acre in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the east side of
Held
until
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board, organization
or group. The project descriptions,
ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available
John
Getter