NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2011–
BOARD MEMBERS POSTING LOCATIONS
Desert Breeze Community Center-8275
Duane Laible, Vice Chair
Lee Plotkin West Flamingo Senior Center-6255 W. Flamingo
Angie Heath Younce, Chair
Diana Morton, Secretary
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
B. Meeting Guidelines
C. Liaison/County Staff Business
D. Approval of Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections Item 5 to be heard first
F. ACTION: Discuss and make recommendations regarding 2011-2012 Town Advisory Board Budget Several items discussed. To continue next meeting.
IV. COMMENTS BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC –Comments by the General Public and Discussion – No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been included on the agenda. Public comment will be limited to three minutes. Prior to speaking please state your name and address and spell your last name for the record. If any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a presentation, this will be done by the Chair, or the Board by majority vote.
BOARD INPUT Member Getter requested discussion and
approval at next meeting of a resolution expressing gratitude to Metro officers
who prevented a possible mass casualty event, and updated efforts to seek
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
Possible action to be taken on the following applications:
Items on the agenda may be taken out of order.
The Spring Valley Town Advisory Board may combine two or more agenda items for consideration.
The Spring Valley Town Advisory Board may remove an item from the agenda or delay
discussion relating to an item at any time.
Discussion – No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been included on the agenda. Public comment will be limited to three minutes. Prior to speaking please state your name and address and spell your last name for the record. If any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a presentation, this will be done by the Chair, or the Board by majority vote.
next meeting date –
DESIGN REVIEW for site and building lighting and signage in conjunction with an
approved hospice care facility and office building on 2.5 acres in a C-P
(Office & Professional) (AE-60 & AE-65) Zone in the
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions. Members complimented the applicant for working with the neighbors and for a complete and thorough presentation
1. UC-0451-09 (ET-0072-11) – FOSTER FAMILY TRUST 1988:
USE PERMITS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence the following: 1) a communication tower; and 2) reduced separation from a residential development.
REVIEW for a communication tower
on a portion of 3.4 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the
MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located on the northeast corner of
Approved 4-1 with staff conditions and the additional condition that removal of the facility be required if it is taken out of service at a future date. (New technologies are expected to supplant this antenna system)
– TRANSWESTERN INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) reduce the separation from an existing communication tower to a residential development; and 2) increase the height of an existing communication tower.
DESIGN REVIEW for an existing communication tower on a portion of 3.5 acres in a C-1
(Local Business District) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
Approved 3-2 with staff conditions plus the removal provision condition in Item 1 above, and the additional condition that $9031.39 in arrears property taxes be made current. The split vote occurred over the taxes provision.
3. VS-0187-11 – storybook homes, llc:
Applicant did not appear. TAB voted 5-0
to move the item to the
4. VS-0366-11 – SCHMIDT, PHILLIP:
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
6. WS-0435-09 (ET-0077-11) –
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence a roof sign.
REVIEWS for the following: 1) a restaurant, convenience store with
gasoline pumps and car wash; and 2) a
comprehensive sign plan on 1.6 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) (AE-60)
(AE-65) Zone in the
Applicant appeared with no detailed plans for the design
review. As requested by the TAB, applicant agreed to return to the