NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2011–
BOARD MEMBERS POSTING LOCATIONS
Dee Gatliff
Desert Breeze Community Center-8275
W.
Duane Laible, Vice Chair
Lee Plotkin West
Flamingo Senior Center-6255 W. Flamingo
Angie Heath Younce, Chair
Diana Morton, Secretary
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
III.
PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A.
Conformance with
the
B.
Meeting
Guidelines
C.
Liaison/County
Staff Business Reminder- Marathon to close streets
this weekend
D.
Approval of
Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
E.
Approval of
Minutes of
F.
Discussion and
possible recommendation regarding zoning agenda items that
are delinquent with property taxes. Passed
5-0 recommendation that
IV. COMMENTS
BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC –Comments by the General Public and Discussion – No
action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until
the matter itself has been included on the agenda. Public comment will be
limited to three minutes. Prior to
speaking please state your name and address and spell your last name for the
record. If any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a
presentation, this will be done by the Chair, or the
Board by majority vote.
V. TOWN
BOARD INPUT Asked CCPRO be
notified of violation of commitments made by applicant to remove illegal and
improper signage at
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
Possible action to be taken on the following applications:
Items on the agenda may be taken out of order.
The Spring Valley Town Advisory Board may combine two or more agenda items for consideration.
The Spring Valley Town Advisory Board may remove an item from the agenda or delay
discussion relating to an item at any time.
Discussion – No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been included on the agenda. Public comment will be limited to three minutes. Prior to speaking please state your name and address and spell your last name for the record. If any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a presentation, this will be done by the Chair, or the Board by majority vote.
VIII. Set next meeting date –
IX. Adjournment
COMMISSIONERS
SUSAN BRAGER, Chair – STEVE SISOLAK,
Vice-Chair
Meeting Location: Desert Breeze Community Center
ATTACHMENT A
HELD OVER FROM
NOVEMBER 8, 2011 MEETING
1A. UC-0480-11 – ELDAN, LLC:
USE PERMIT for a major training facility (yoga) within an office
and retail center on 1.9 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) (AE-60) Zone in
the
Approved 5-0. No opposition presented. Applicant expects a total of 40
students
1. DR-0510-11 – VONS COMPANIES, INC:
DESIGN REVIEW for a proposed bank on a pad site in conjunction with an existing
shopping center on 1.2 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the
northeast corner of
Approved
5-0. Chase Bank has
signed Letter of Intent
2. UC-0506-11 – REYNOLDS FAMILY 1996 TRUST:
USE PERMIT to allow a minor training facility (martial arts)
in conjunction with an existing office complex on 1.4 acres in a C-P (Office & Professional) Zone. Generally located on the
north side of
Approved 5-0
with condition of obtaining business license
3. VS-0502-11
– so rainbow
VACATE
Approved 5-0
4. WS-0511-11
– SHDML, LLC:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1)
reduced setbacks; and 2) reduce the building separation in conjunction
with a single family residence on 1.0 acre in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone.
Generally located on the east side of
Denied
4-1 per staff recommendations. Applicant did not know who owns adjoining parcels and had not
discussed possible negative impacts on those properties. Significant reductions
requested for questionable reasons as the building already shades the area in
question. Applicant offered no rebuttal to staff recommendations for denial.
The single vote in favor was cast with a comment that the request involves
areas behind a wall and generally not visible.
5. WS-0508-11
– LIU DINGRONG, ET AL:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) reduced corner setback to an accessory structure; and 2) reduce setback from a street to an
existing accessory structure (storage shed) in conjunction with an existing
residence on 0.1 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the
northeast corner of
Denied 5-0. The applicant presented several
signatures of neighbors in support of the request and two neaighbors
appeared asking it be approved. They supported the request saying the shed
built is much better and more attractive than those on other nearby properties
and that this was an outstanding neighbor. The shed was placed without apparent
knowledge of the need for permits and was assembled by a family friend who
described himself as a handyman. English was a second language for the handyman
and the applicant was represented by a fried due to the applicants
lack of English language skills.
The members learned the shed has no plumbing
or electrical service. We asked the staff if simply moving the location might
bring it into compliance with regulations and it appeared that may be an
option. At TAB request, the staff member met with the applicant outside the
meeting and it appears they are seeking a viable solution to come into
compliance. We expressed our hope they could return to a future meeting and
achieve approval.
6. ZC-1233-05 (ET-0103-11) –
USE
PERMITS for the following: 1) increase building heights; and 2) density bonus.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a mixed-use
development in the MUD-2,
Approved 5-0 with
additional conditions.
Applicant had finalized sale about 3
hours before the meeting. The new owners stated they do not intend to build the
originally approved 215 feet tall structure and acknowledged the incentives
included in that plan had been inadequate for the use with only 3% commercial
space. There is no grocery store tenant identified or anticipated. The modified
conditions were agreeable to the applicant. They are:
2 year extension
New design review
Use permits if there is any density or
intensity increase
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
John
Getter