Results
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2012–
BOARD MEMBERS POSTING
LOCATIONS
Dee Gatliff Desert Breeze Community Center-8275
W.
George Kuck
Duane Laible, Vice Chair
Angie Heath Younce, Chair Absent excused
Diana Morton, Secretary
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
III.
PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A.
Conformance with
the
B.
Meeting
Guidelines
C.
Liaison/County
Staff Business Metro Safety Day update
D.
Approval of
Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
E.
Approval of
Minutes of
IV. COMMENTS
BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC – None
V. TOWN BOARD INPUT VC Laible
reported on Chair/Vice-Chair meeting
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
Possible
action to be taken on the following applications:
VIII. Set
next meeting date –
IX. Adjournment In memory of Grace Yearington
ATTACHMENT A
1. DR-0389-10 (ET-0121-12) – cimarron & MAULE, LLC:
DESIGN
REVIEW FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to
commence an office complex on a portion of 9.2 acres in a C-P (Office &
Professional) Zone in the MUD-3 and
Approved 4-0 with staff conditions
2. WS-0350-10 (ET-0120-12)
– dean, jerry l. & Deanna s., et al:
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence non-standard off-site improvements in
conjunction with an existing single family residence and proposed accessory
structure on 2.0 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the
Approved 4-0
with staff conditions
3. UC-0574-12 –
USE PERMIT for a place of worship within an existing office
complex on a portion of 5.6 acres in a
C-P (Office & Professional) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
Approved 4-0
with staff conditions
4. UC-0587-12 – HESSELGESSER,
PAUL L.:
USE PERMITS
for the following: 1) allow an accessory building (basketball
court) to exceed one-half the footprint of the principal dwelling; 2) allow
the cumulative area of all accessory structures to exceed the footprint of the
principal dwelling; 3) allow an accessory structure not compatible with
the principal dwelling; and 4) allow an accessory structure not
compatible with the principal dwelling to be visible from residential
development.
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to increase the height of an accessory structure.
DESIGN
REVIEW for an accessory structure
on 9.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the
Denied 4-0. 1 family appeared in opposition. None
appeared in support.
TAB members questioned the construction
of what appears to be a warehouse facility labeled as a basketball arena in an
area surrounded by residential development. Key points in the decision:
·
Overhead
garage doors indicate future use planned that is not included in the application
·
The
building would be in direct view of adjacent homes on El Camino across the
channelized wash and hiking trail.
·
The
building design (metal), appearance and scale is completely out of sync with
the surrounding neighborhood
·
The
area where the project is proposed is already improved with offsites
and streets essentially identical to the developed and built-out subdivision
next door.
·
The
proposed project is out of character with the neighborhood.
·
Neighbors
have been strongly opposed to anything other than residential projects in this
area, but due to the size of the privately owned aggregated parcels only one
received a notice and appeared.
5. DR-0581-12 – RED
DESIGN REVIEW for freestanding signs in conjunction with an office complex on 4.7
acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the MUD-3 and
Approved 4-0
with staff conditions
6. ZC-0945-06 (ET-0116-12)
– NEOPHYTE REO, LLC:
USE
PERMITS for the following: 1) increased building height; 2) increased density; and 3) a mixed-use development in a C-2
(General Commercial) Zone.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a mixed use
development. Generally
located on the southwest corner of
HELD- NO REPRESENTATIVE IN ATTENDANCE
7. UC-0571-12 –
USE PERMIT for alternative standards for temporary outdoor
commercial events.
DESIGN REVIEW for temporary outdoor commercial event
structures in conjunction with an existing place of worship on 8.6 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in
the
Approved 4-0
with staff conditions
No opposition
TAB members
complimented the applicant for their work to minimize neighborhood impacts and
for working with Commissioner Sisolak’s office to enhance
parking and traffic flow.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board, organization
or group. The project descriptions,
ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available
John
Getter