RESULTS
TUESDAY, MAY 28, 2013–
BOARD MEMBERS
Dee Gatliff
John Getter
George Kuck, Vice- Chair
Duane Laible, Chair
Angie Heath Younce
Diana Morton, Secretary
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A. Conformance with the
B. Meeting Guidelines
C. Approval of Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
D. Approval of Minutes of
E. Liaison/County Staff Business None
IV. COMMENTS BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC – None
V. TOWN BOARD INPUT Member Gatliff says issues continue with a
retail business being operated from a home on DI. CCPRO is investigating.
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
Possible action to be taken on the following applications:
SEE ATTACHMENT “A”
VII. COMMENTS BY
THE GENERAL PUBLIC - None
VIII. Set next meeting date –
IX. Adjournment
ATTACHMENT A
HELD OVER FROM MAY
14, 2013 MEETING
1A. UC-1127-07 (ET-0037-13)
- nevada power company, et al:
USE
PERMITS SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
to commence the following: 1) electrical
transmission lines; and 2) public
utility structures including ancillary structures and facilities.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the
following: 1) permit overhead power
lines; and 2) encroachment into
airspace.
DESIGN
REVIEW for public utility
structures (electrical transmission lines) including ancillary structures and
facilities in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone, an R-4 (Multiple Family
Residential - High Density) Zone, a P-F (Public Facility) Zone, a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone, and an M-1 (Light
Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located on the
east and west sides of
Approved 5-0 WITH MODIFIED ROUTE moved
to the rear of the property as requested by the property owner. TAB unanimously
agreed that the lack of a fully-negotiated agreement between NV Energy and the
land owner resulted from NV Energy extensively delaying negotiations. Both
parties stated they had an agreement in principal to change the route to the
rear of the property with some issues to be resolved. NV Energy declined to
explain those issues. The approved route takes the large power lines along a
railroad track right of way and away from the public street.
USE PERMIT
for personal services (beauty salon) in conjunction with an existing office
building on 4.7 acres in a C-P (Office & Professional) Zone. Generally located on the
west side of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
2. ZC-0588-09 (ET-0044-13)
– SAINT MICHAEL ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX
CHURCH:
USE PERMITS SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME to complete the following: 1)
a place of worship; and 2) eliminate the required setback from a
street (
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1)
allow a place of worship not to be accessed from a collector or arterial street
where access to a collector or arterial street is required; 2) increase
the height of a block wall; 3) eliminate street landscaping (El Camino
Road); 4) reduce the height setback ratio; and 5) alternative
landscaping standards adjacent to a less intensive use.
DESIGN REVIEW for monument signage in the CMA Design Overlay
District on 2.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (AE-60) Zone in the
CMA Design Overlay District. Generally located on the
north side of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
3. ZC-0237-13 – cimarron & MAULE, LLC:
ZONE CHANGE
to reclassify 10.8 acres from C-P (Office & Professional) Zone to C-2
(General Commercial) Zone.
DESIGN REVIEW for a commercial complex consisting of an out-patient surgical center,
hotel, restaurant, retail, and offices in the MUD-3 and CMA Design Overlay
Districts. Generally
located on the northeast corner of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
4. ZC-0259-13 – RGK TRUST:
ZONE CHANGE
to reclassify 10.0 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2
(Medium Density Residential) Zone for a single family development in the CMA
Design Overlay District.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) reduced
street intersection off-set; and 2) modified street improvements in
accordance with Clark County Uniform Standard Drawings. Generally located on the east side of Torrey Pines
Drive and north side of
Approved 5-0 with appropriate staff conditions.
Three neighbors including the President
of the adjoining HOA appeared to protest the requested R2 zone. Staff agreed
with the neighbors that skipping a zone with no transition was not appropriate
and the TAB agreed. The neighbors and TAB welcomed the residential development,
the only issue being density. The applicant agreed they would prefer the R1
Zone to holding for two weeks for additional meetings with the neighbors.
Seeing the parcel surrounded by RD, R1 and RE (RNP) parcels the TAB recommends
R1.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
John
Getter