RESULTS
TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2014
BOARD MEMBERS
Dee Gatliff
John Getter
George Kuck, Vice- Chair
Duane Laible, Chair
Angie Heath Younce
Diana Morton, Secretary
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
III.
PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A.
Conformance with
the Nevada Open Meeting Law
B.
Meeting
Guidelines
C.
Approval of
Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections Re-ordered
to 1A,14,15,1/12 then balance of agenda
D.
Approval of
Minutes of January 14, 2014
E.
Liaison/County
Staff Business
IV. COMMENTS
BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC A resident brought concerns
about potential CCPRO issues in the Kingsgate Community. Referred to Michael
Shannon.
V. TOWN BOARD INPUT
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
Possible
action to be taken on the following applications:
VIII. Set
next meeting date
IX. Adjournment
ATTACHMENT A
RESULTS
TUESDAY,
01/22/14
1A UC-0795-13 TOCK 5 IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL:
USE PERMIT for modified residential development
standards in conjunction with a single family subdivision.
WAIVERS for
the following: 1) modified
street improvements in accordance with Clark County Uniform Standard Drawings;
and 2) allow early finished
grading.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential subdivision on 21.0 acres in an R-3
(Multiple Family Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay) Zone in the
Rhodes Ranch Master Planned Community. Generally located on the south side
Wigwam Avenue and the east side of Grand Canyon Drive within Spring Valley and
Enterprise. SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
02/18/14 PC
1. NZC-0864-13
WELLS TENAYA PROPERTIES, ILO,
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for increased wall height.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development Generally
located on the east side of Tenaya Way, 400 feet south of Spring Mountain Road
within Spring Valley (description on file), SBIdgiml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
2. NZC-0857-13
H.A.N.D. PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY:
USE PERMIT for a senior housing facility.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) increased building height; 2)
eliminate or reduce screening and landscape buffer requirements; 3) reduced
parking; and 4) reduced required open space requirements.
DESIGN REVIEW for a senior housing facility. Generally located on
the north side of Flamingo Road, 660 feet west of Durango Drive within Spring
Valley (description on file). SB/dg/ml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with modifications. Approved
R3 (not R4) with denial of waivers and design review per staff
3. NZC-0008-14 VREO XXIV, LLC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to increase building
height.
DESIGN REVIEW for a multi-family residential development on 9.4 acres. Generally located on the north side of
Spanish Ridge Avenue and the west side of Durango Drive within Spring Valley
(description on file). SB/al/ml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
4. NZC-0005-14 RUSSELL BELTWAY, LLC, ET AL:
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the south side of
Patrick Lane, 660 feet east of Fort Apache Road within Spring Valley
(description on file). sb/pb/ml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with modifications to R2
5. NZC-0004-14 PATRICK & RILEY, LLC, ET
AL:
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the north and south
sides of Patrick Lane and the west side of Riley Street within Spring Valley
(description on file). sb/pb/ml (For possible action)
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
6. NZC-0001-14 GRAGSON CACTUS II INVEST, ET AL:
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the northwest corner of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions plus
additional conditions R2 density limited to 5/du/acre
7. NZC-0003-14 GKT 4 LLC, ET AL:
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the southeast corner of
Approved zone change 5-0 with staff
conditions plus density limited to 5.6du/acre
8. NZC-0002-14 GRAGSON LONE
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the northeast corner of
Approved zone change 5-0 with staff
conditions plus additional conditions reduced to R2, denial of design review
9. NZC-0855-13 TENAYA LOFTS, LLC:
USE
PERMIT for a residential planned unit development.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
single family residential planned unit development. Generally located on the west side of
Denied 3-2. Majority felt the project is too early
pending and changes in job-supporting use.
10. NZC-0866-13
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the south side of
Denied 4-1 per staff recommendations
11. NZC-0850-13
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family
residential development. Generally
located on the north side of Martin Avenue, 1,000 feet east of Quarterhorse
Lane within Spring Valley (description on file). SB/rk/ml
(For possible action)
Approved zone change 5-0 with staff conditions,
plus additional condition of no change from 5/7du/acre
12. TM-0246-13 - WELLS TENAYA PROPERTIES, LLC:
TENTATIVE
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
13. UC-0863-13 BOLV RE HOLDINGS I, LLC:
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) horse riding/rental stable; and 2) reduced lot area for a horse/riding rental stable.
DESIGN REVIEW for a horse riding/rental stable facility in conjunction with an
existing single family residence on 4.0 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone in the
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
14. VS-0859-13
BABB INvestments, llc:
VACATE
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
DESIGN REVIEW for a veterinary clinic and
service on 1.1 acres in conjunction with an approved shopping center in a C-2
(General Commercial) Zone in the
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
02/04/14 PC
16. VS-0814-13 RONALD M. LEVI TRUST:
VACATE
Held 5-0 for 2/11/14 meeting. No
applicant appeared
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available Clark County Records. This document may be freely distributed and
reproduced as long as the authors content is not altered. Additional comments may be added. Additional comments must be clearly
attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the
document. The additional comments
authors affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be
clearly identified. This attribution
statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
John
Getter