NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
RESULTS
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2014–
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A. Conformance
with the
B. Meeting Guidelines
C. Approval of Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
D. Approval
of Minutes of
E. Liaison/County Staff Business
F. Final 2015 Budget Requests Held to next meeting
G. Announcement: Applications are available for the Spring Valley Town Advisory Board. Terms are for two years beginning in January 2015. If selected, required training is in January 2015.
H. Correspondence:
Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Marathon dates and street closures letter.
Letter and invitation from Saint Michael Antiochian Orthodox Church new hall and community center grand opening.
IV. COMMENTS BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC – None
V. TOWN BOARD INPUT Member Getter briefed the board on the dedication of the new Ethiopian
Orthodox Church. The event was attended by nearly 2000 with leaders from
several countries. The congregation thanked the SVTAB for helping with the
approval process and changes. The project took 5 years to complete.
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
VIII. Set next meeting date –
IX. Adjournment
ATTACHMENT A
HELDOVER FROM
1A. UC-0698-14
–
USE PERMITS for the following: 1)
reduce the setback for a temporary outdoor commercial event from a residential
development; and 2) reduce the setback for live entertainment for a
temporary outdoor commercial event from a residential development.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
temporary outdoor commercial event in conjunction with a place of worship and
private school on 13.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (AE-60) Zone
in the
Approved
5-0
1.
WS-0765-14
– JOHN & JENNIFER ELLIOT LIVING TRUST:
(
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce the side setback for a proposed accessory
apartment in conjunction with a single family residence on 0.5 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located on the southwest corner of
Approved 3-2 with additional conditions:
replace landscaping on the west side and no sidewalk to extend to Lafite.
2.
DR-0762-14
– BIRTHDAY
DESIGN
REVIEW for an addition to an
existing commercial building on 0.8 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in
the
PC
Approved 5-0
3.
VS-0753-14 – Greystone
VACATE
Held to 10-14 meeting
4.
VC-0713-14
– PEREZ, JAMIE R.: (
VARIANCE to reduce the rear yard
setback in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.1 acres in
an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) P-C
(Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Rhodes Ranch Master Planned
Community. Generally located on the
west side of
Denial 3-2
Applicant
claimed approval 8 years earlier, but just now being able to afford to do the
project. Majority was opposed to reduced setbacks per staff recommendations.
5.
DR-0750-14
– KB HOME
DESIGN REVIEW for additional home models in conjunction with an approved single
family residential subdivision on 5.4 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the southwest corner of
Approved
5-0
6.
DR-0755-14
– KB HOME
DESIGN REVIEW for additional home models in conjunction with an approved single
family residential subdivision on 13.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone in the
Approved
5-0
7.
TM-0162-14 – POWELL,
TENTATIVE
Denial
5-0 in parallel with denial of item 10
8.
VS-0772-14 – POWELL,
VACATE
Approved 5-0
9.
ZC-0650-14
– THANOS, NICHOLAS J. & JERALD: (Sunset/Hauck)
DESIGN REVIEW for a retail center. Generally located on the north side of Sunset Road, 580 feet west
of
Deny 5-0
per staff recommendation
Applicant wishes to change zoning
because new policies remove C-2 from BDRP uses. Applicant has held the 2.5 acre
property for 20 years with no development and presented no development plans. TAB advised that it
concurred with staff position that this would disrupt the job-producing nature
of the planned BDRP use. Applicant said commercial development in the area
justified his request and he would “take it to a higher power” for
consideration.
10.
ZC-0767-14
– POWELL,
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce side setbacks.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the
north side of
Deny 5-0 per staff recommendation
Self-imposed hardship of undersize lots. TAB suggested a redesign and return for consideration.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
John
Getter