RESULTS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2015–
BOARD MEMBERS POSTING LOCATIONS
John Catlett Desert Breeze
Community Center-8275 W.
Dee Gatliff,
John Getter, Chair
Darby Johnson, Jr.
Angie Heath Younce
Mike Shannon, Town Liaison (702) 455-8338
Diana Morton, Secretary (702) 254-8413
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. PROCEDURES/CONDUCT
A. Conformance
with the
B. Meeting Guidelines
C. Approval of Agenda Posted, Including Any Deletions or Corrections
Item 6
held at applicant’s request
D. Approval
of Minutes of
E. Liaison/County Staff Business - None
F. Receive and discuss a report on the Consolidated Urban Land Use Policies - Received
IV. COMMENTS BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC – None
V. TOWN BOARD
INPUT - None
VI. PLANNING & ZONING
VIII. Set next meeting date –
IX. Adjournment
ATTACHMENT A
1.
UC-0029-15 –
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) reduce the separation
between an outside dining and drinking area and a residential use; 2)
waive the minimum 48 inch wide pedestrian access around the perimeter of the
outside dining and drinking area; and 3) allow an outside dining and
drinking area with on-premise consumption of alcohol without primary means of
access from the interior of the restaurant.
DESIGN REVIEW for an outside dining and drinking area in conjunction with an
existing restaurant within an existing shopping center on a portion of 7.9
acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone.
Generally located on the north side of
Denied 5-0 per staff recommendations
2.
WS-0007-15
– WATER OF
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1)
allow a second monument sign where only 1 is allowed; and 2) increase
the height of an accessory structure.
DESIGN REVIEW for signage and a shade canopy in
conjunction with an existing place of worship on 3.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the
east side of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
3.
WS-0018-15
–
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to increase wall/fence height in
conjunction with a proposed single family residence on 0.5 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located on the south side of
Approved 5-0 with staff conditions
4.
DR-0026-15
– HIMARK KST, LLC:
DESIGN REVIEW for an addition to a restaurant (Popeye’s Restaurant) in conjunction
with an existing shopping center on 1.4 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone in the
Approved
5-0 with staff conditions
5.
UC-0024-15
– AMOEBA DEFENSE, LLC:
USE PERMITS for the following:
1) reduce the separation between a convenience store and a
residential use; and 2) reduce the separation between a gasoline station
and a residential use in conjunction with a proposed retail center and existing
tavern (PT’s Pub).
WAIVERS OF CONDITIONS of a zone change
(ZC-0746-02) requiring the following: 1)
a design review as a public hearing for all subsequent land use applications;
and 2) undulation berms a minimum of 3 feet in height shall be placed in
the landscape buffer with pedestrian linkage from the sidewalk.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1)
reduced parking; and 2) reduced driveway separations to an
intersection.
DESIGN REVIEW for a retail center with a convenience store and gasoline station on 2.3 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone. Generally
located on the northeast corner of
Denied
5-0
1
neighbor appeared in opposition
TAB
believes the character of this area has changed to be residential. With the
creation of an additional subdivision on the East side, the proposed separation
for both a convenience store and a gas station from residential uses would be
reduced 95% to 10 feet. As this is a
The
existence of a PT’s Pub several hundred feet north of the intersection on an
adjoining parcel was not seen as germaine to this
request. The pub is not on the corner. Further, it existed before much of the
residential development came to be. Staff confirmed that while residential
developers have the option to request approvals adjacent to such developments,
the reverse is not available.
TAB
also found the proposed development violates Item 61 of the
#61 When commercial development is proposed
adjacent to single family residential areas, nuisances caused by incompatible uses, noise,
lighting, and signs that detract from and are not consistent with the existing
residential development should be prevented.
A
Use Permit is a discretionary land use and the TAB felt it was NOT appropriate
in this case. As the Use Permit request was denied by the TAB, at the request
of the applicant the TAB denied the entire application.
6.
WS-0019-15
– NV I-215
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) allow a freestanding sign; and 2)
reduce the separation from a project identification sign to a freestanding
sign.
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following: 1) a freestanding sign; and 2) project identification signs in
conjunction with an approved multiple family residential development on 17.2
acres in an R-4 (Multiple Family Residential - High Density) Zone and an R-4
(Multiple Family Residential - High Density) (AE-60) Zone in the
Held per applicant request
HELD OVER FROM JANUARY 27, 2015 TOWN BOARD MEETING
7. UC-0664-12 (ET-0158-14) – THE Howard hughes CORP., ET AL:
USE PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence and review a future expansion to a private recreational
facility (water park) and allow a temporary parking
lot in conjunction with a private recreational facility.
VARIANCE to allow a temporary parking lot have a semi-permanent surface
instead of asphalt or concrete.
WAIVER to defer full
off-site improvements (Maule Avenue) on 41.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) P-C (Planned Community
Overlay District) Zone within Village 16A in the Summerlin
South Master Planned Community. Generally located on the south side of
The applicant did not appear and did not
contact the TAB for the second consecutive meeting. Based on previous
commitments from the applicant during the initial approval of this item that no
extensions of time would be requested, and the failure to appear to offer any
explanation, the TAB voted to take action. Members expressed the belief, due to
existing heavy use and traffic, that it was inappropriate to consider
non-permanent parking facilities, semi-permanent parking surfaces and deferred
off-site improvements.
Denied 5-0
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
John
Getter