Results
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the BCC within five business days of the date of the PC hearing. Appeal form is found at:
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network(SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
AGENDA
Date:
Location:
All items listed
on the agenda are for action by the Enterprise Town Advisory Board unless
otherwise noted. Action may consist of any of the following: recommend
approval, recommend denial, and recommend conditions of approval hold or table.
The Enterprise
Library is accessible to individuals with disabilities. With forty-eight (48)
hour advance request, a sign language interpreter may be made available by
calling 455-3530 or TDD 385-7486 or Relay
CALL TO ORDER*:
1. Approve the Agenda with any corrections,
deletions or changes. TAB
approved: with the
following changes:
Call to Order. Item #4
to be trailed to end of meeting.
Zoning Agenda Items 8 through 11 are related and will be heard
together after Item #1.
The agenda was reconsidered when the applicant asked to hold
item #12.
Agenda reconsideration approved (5-0).
Item # 12 was held until April 15, 2009.
Revised agenda was approved (5-0)
2. Approve the Minutes for the meeting
held on
3. Receive reports, discuss and take
actions as necessary on recommendations regarding Performance Bonds.
TAB continued this item to April 15, 2009.
The
discussion centered on the Rhodes Chapter 11 filing and how that would affect
4. Discuss
and recommend procedures and schedule to conduct hearings for the Enterprise
Land Use Plan.
The
Enterprise Land Use Plan hearings will occur over a series of meetings. There are 270+ requests that involve over 500
land parcels. The hearings will be arranged
by geographic area listed below the hearing date. The schedule for the Enterprise Land Use Plan
update is:
April 6 Open
House, South Point Casino,
April 23 TAB
briefed by Current Planning. Pueblo Room,
April 29 Regular
TAB meeting, Commission Chambers,
Land
use changes West of
May 2 Special
TAB meeting, Commission Chambers,
Land
use changes East of
May 9 Special
TAB meeting, Commission Chambers,
Land use changes between
May 27 Regular
TAB meeting, Commission Chambers,
June 18 Planning
Commission, Commission Chambers,
Aug 5
The land use meeting
procedures to be use are being review at the county level and will be published
when they are approved.
5. Discuss and make recommendations on
county procedures for TAB recommendations that appear as “Routine Action” on the Planning Commission
and Zoning Commission agendas.
TAB tabled
this item until a future date
The discussion involved the TAB members, the TAB Liaison, Current
Planning Staff representative, and the public.
When the PC and BCC meet, there may be two sets of recommendations made
to the commissioners on an application.
One by the county staff and the other by the TAB/CAC. The TAB/CAC recommendations are read into the
record. However, this does not mean they
will be discussed or acted upon as an alternate opinion or solution. One of the commissioners must either pull the
item from the routine action agenda or make a motion to have the TAB/CAC
recommendation included in the application approval. This gives more weight to the staff
recommendations. Many times, the TAB/CAC
is aware of history and conditions that are not apparently known at the county
level. These considerations are factored
into the TAB recommendation. The TAB/CAC’s
communications on recommendations to the commissioners needs to be
improved. This improved communication
would help give equal weigh to TAB/CAC recommendations.
See attachment #1 for
additional discussion. This item will be
taken up at the TAB/CAC Chair/Vice Chair meeting on
COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. Receive a report from the Enterprise TAB
Residential Buffering Sub-Committee and take any action deemed necessary. TAB
tabled this item until
ZONING AGENDA
SEE
ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A resident commented
on the bottlenecked traffic at
A resident requested consideration of
a comprehensive speed limit plan within
RNPs.
NEXT MEETING DATE
ATTACHMENT A
1. UC-0266-99
(ET-0048-09) – EVANS, KEITH: TAB approved with:
Current Planning Condition bullet #1 to read:
Until
USE PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review the
expansion of an existing exotic animal compound.
VARIANCE to increase the height of existing
walls/fences to 10 feet where a maximum height of 6 feet (4 foot height with
the top 2 feet 50% open in the front setback) is permitted in conjunction with
a single family residence on approximately 5.7 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone. Generally located on the northwest corner of
The
staff recommended a 5 year review. Area suitability
for this use has improved since the last review. The surrounding
2. WS-0042-07
(ET-0052-09) - DAEFOOR RE DEVELOPMENT, LLC: TAB approved per staff conditions
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence
reduced lot size in conjunction with a minor subdivision on 2.5 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located on the
northwest corner of Serene Avenue and
3. NZC-0100-09 – VISION QUEST DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC; ET AL: TAB
Denied.
The applicant has withdrawn the Waiver of Conditions. If
approved: delete Major Projects Engineering
first bullet, construct full off sites.
HOLDOVER ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 3.5 acres from C-P
(Office and Professional) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone to C-1
(Local Business) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone.
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a Concept Plan (MP-0420-02)
requiring a 30 foot wide buffer along the north, east, south, and portions of
the west boundaries of the northeast RNP area, the buffer will be designed in
accordance with the exhibit submitted at the Planning Commission meeting, and
shall be installed concurrently with the development of projects adjacent to
the RNP area.
DESIGN REVIEW for a neighborhood retail center
consisting of 2 buildings in the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community. Generally located
on the southwest corner of
This
item resulted in considerable discussion on several factors that affect this
application. The TAB denial was based
upon the need to consider land use on the entire west side of Rainbow during
the Enterprise Major Land Use update.
This application is spot zoning that would set a precedent without considering
the entire area and the effect on the RNP to the west. C-1 may be appropriate for
the west side of Rainbow. However, the
number of special use permits allowed in the C-1 zone district must be
considered. Most of the special use
permit uses are not appropriate next to an RNP-1.
The
Waiver of Conditions withdrawal preserves the trail on the western side of the property
and provides an additional buffer to the RNP-1 area. This trail has been planned since the
inception of the Mountain’s Edge Master Plan.
The trail was one promise made to the RNP residents to include their
property in the Mountain’s Edge concept area.
This promise must be honored. The
loss of the trail right-of-way would delete a major section of the planned
trails. The trail plan revision would create
a significant delay in trail development.
In addition, RNP buffering would be lost.
The
overall design of the project is one of the best the TAB has seen next to an
RNP-1. The design of the buildings has
sufficient residential character to blend with the neighborhood. The staff conditions reduce the impact of the
project on the adjacent residential.
One
very significant issue revealed by this application is the off sites FOCUS
contracted to provide, have not yet started.
The applicant is paying the SID that covers the west side of
Rainbow. The property owner has meet
his/her responsibility for off sites by participating in the SID. Major
Projects must pursue FOCUS to complete
the promised off sites under SID # 142.
Any suggestion by county staff that the applicant be required to
construct the off sites is not appropriate and could result in legal action
against the county. This problem is not
limited to this property. Additional
property owners are paying into the SID, yet do not have the infrastructure to
proceed with their projects. The TAB
felt it could not require a property owner to pay for the off sites twice. PC agenda item # 19
4. UC-0080-09 - LASWELL INVESTMENT TRUST: TAB approved with:
Current
Planning bullet #1 to read:
6
months to commence and obtain all final inspections, permits, and/or licenses
from all appropriate agencies and
review as Public Hearing
Add:
All other structures, excluding existing
house, must be removed in 6 months.
AMENDED HOLDOVER USE PERMITS for the
following:
1) waive architectural compatibility of an accessory
structure to the principal structure;
2) allow an accessory structure (metal building) (previously
notified as covered riding arena) to exceed one-half the footprint of the
principal dwelling;
3) allow the cumulative area of all accessory structures to
exceed the footprint of the principal dwelling;
4) allow a non-decorative or non-standing seam metal roof; and
5) allow a roof to be constructed of the same material as the
exterior siding
on 0.6 acres in
an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located
on the east side of
Significant
progress has been made in cleaning up this property. The approvals for the structure in this
application are required to help complete this clean up. The building use is dependent on approval of
this application. After which, a
building inspection can be completed. It
can then be used for storage.
The
TAB changed the review to six months because the actions required by
UC-0148-07,
5. UC-0131-09 – GAUGHAN SOUTH, LLC: TAB held to
The applicant did not agree to Hold the
item until the next TAB meeting. The
applicant’s representative will
forward the TAB request to the
applicant. The applicant may schedule a
meeting with the neighbors prior to the Planning Commission meeting, so that it
would be unnecessary to come back to the TAB.
USE PERMIT for a parking lot.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to eliminate
parking lot landscaping.
DESIGN REVIEW for a parking lot on 5.0 acres in an
H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located
on the north side of
The TAB did not make a
recommendation on this application due to the extent of the neighborhood
opposition. There were 12 adjacent and nearby
residents in very strong opposition to the parking lot. These residents also had a residents’ petition
opposing the project signed by a number of residents. The TAB felt there needs
to be a neighborhood meeting to examine the neighbors’ complaints and how the
solutions meet their needs prior to any recommendation.
The property has been
used as unpaved parking for trucks and horse/cattle trailers during events at
the South Point. This has created a nuisance
for the nearby residents. This nuisance consists of truck traffic on the local
street to the north, idling trucks at all hours, smells from parked trailers,
and possible unsanitary conditions due to animal manure. PC
routine action item # 12
6. VS-0128-09 – TORREY PINES – ERIE, LLC: TAB approved
VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Torrey Pines Drive and El Camino Road
(alignment), and between Levi Avenue and Erie Avenue, and rights-of-way being Maplewood Park Court, Whitney Grove Court, Chapel
Trace Court, Holly Garden Court, Bethpage Court, and Inland Seas Court located
east of Torrey Pines Drive between Levi Avenue and Erie Avenue in an R-2
(Medium Density Residential) Zone within Enterprise (description on file). PC routine action
item # 16
7. WS-0136-09 – BLUE DIAMOND PROPERTIES, LLC: TAB approved
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the
following:
1) reduce front setback; and
2) reduce parking.
DESIGN REVIEW for a prefabricated accessory building
in conjunction with an existing industrial building and outside storage yard on
2.4 acres in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone.
Generally located on the
south side of
8. WT-0121-09 – CANARELLI, LAWERENCE: TAB approved
WAIVER to extend the time limit for an improvement bond in
conjunction with a residential subdivision in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located
on the east side of Torrey
9. WT-0122-09 – CANARELLI, LAWERENCE: TAB approved
WAIVER to extend the time for an improvement bond in conjunction
with a residential subdivision in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in
the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area.
Generally located on the
west side of Torrey
10. WT-0123-09 – CANARELLI,
WAIVER to extend the time limit for an improvement bond in
conjunction with a residential subdivision in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located
on the east side of
11. WT-0124-09 –
WAIVER to extend the time limit for an improvement bond in
conjunction with a residential subdivision in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located
on the north side of
12. ZC-0116-09 – SOUTH DECATUR HOLDING CO, LLC: Held by applicant to
ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 1.1 acres from R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) Zone to C-P (Office & Professional) Zone.
DESIGN REVIEW for an office building. Generally located
on the east side of
Additional items to be heard by the PC or
BCC. These items were previously heard
by the
PC CONSENT AGENDA:
9. UC-0089-09 – SIRAN-LOUGHERY, KAREN AND LOUGHERY, GEOFF:
HOLDOVER
USE PERMITS for the following:
1) allow an
accessory structure (covered riding arena) to exceed one-half the footprint of
the principal dwelling;
2) allow the
cumulative area of all accessory structures to exceed the footprint of the principal
dwelling;
3) allow a
non-decorative or non-standing seam metal roof; and
4) allow a roof to be constructed of the same material as the exterior siding.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
increase the height of an accessory structure (covered riding arena) on 1.2
acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally
located on
the north side of
PC AGENDA:
None
BCC CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (Morning):
4. DR-0165-08 (ET-0045-09) –
DESIGN
REVIEW FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to
commence construction of a 246 unit condominium complex on 10.0 acres in an R-4
(Multiple Family Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay) Zone in the
Rhodes Ranch Master Planned Community. Generally located on the
south side of
BCC AGENDA ITEMS (Morning):
23. ZC-0069-09 – ELIADES, PETER:
HOLDOVER ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 1.9 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone to C-2 (General Commercial) Zone for a banquet facility.
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) a banquet facility on a property less than 2 acres; and 2) a banquet facility with outside uses.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the
following:
1) increased
fence height within setbacks;
2) alternative
landscaping;
3) attached
sidewalk;
4) eliminate
setback to access gates;
5) reduced
throat depth;
6) allow
commercial access onto a local street (
7) reduced driveway width.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a banquet facility
with manager’s unit. Generally located on the southwest corner of
26. UC-0075-09 – PRADO ATTACHED HOMES, LLC:
USE PERMITS
for the following:
1) increase
density; and
2) reduce the setback from a single family residential use.
DESIGN
REVIEW for mixed-use development
on 5.2 acres in a U-V (
This
item was discussed extensively by the TAB.
The TAB has been very concerned with MUD
development in
·The
cumulative effect of five MUD projects in the area has added 1100+ residential
units on 35 acres of land planned for commercial use. This is equal in residential units to the
Nevada Trails development.
·MUD
projects are primarily high density residential. MUD residents will have to travel to work,
shopping, etc., increasing vehicle use.
·Where
will the businesses that provide jobs be created?
·The
county does not have cost recovery mechanisms in place for services required by
this level of development. Each project
is below the current point that additional agreements are needed.
·The
grocery store density bonus is not enforceable by the county. The TAB has recommend it be eliminated.
·The
CMA was designated to help avoid the hazards of aircraft overflight, noise and
crashes.
·CMA
deed-restricted land prohibits residential uses.
·The
·The
five year plan for the RTC does not show any bus routes in this area.
The
applicant’s elevations did not accurately reflect the project design. Specifically, the placement of the commercial
elements of the MUD project were not shown.
TAB Approved/Denied
Denied
Use Permit #1: Density
denial based upon cumulative negative effect of mixed-use development on county
public services and schools in the immediate area. TAB recommended the previously approved
density of 188 units be used for the project.
Approved
Use Permit #2
Denied
Design Review: based on
denial of Use Permit #1
PC Action - Approved
BCC (Afternoon):
29. WS-0642-08 – KOREAN-
HOLDOVER APPEAL WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for full off-site improvements (excluding paving).
WAIVERS
OF CONDITIONS of a use permit
(UC-1578-99) requiring the following:
1.
B-1
landscaping along the
2.
off-sites
adjacent to
3.
sign
deed restrictions;
4.
driveway
locations to be approved by Clark County Traffic Management Division;
5.
raise
height of existing block wall along east property line adjacent to APN
163-11-405-005, 2 feet (3 courses of block) and replace existing cap on top,
this includes any necessary structural changes needed to properly retain the
church’s side of the property including a water sealant to be applied below the
grade level;
6.
15
gallon minimum Mondel Pine trees to be planted 15 feet on center along the east
property line adjacent to APN’s 163-11-405 005 & 006 to provide for privacy
of neighbors and for an additional sound barrier with the existing blacktop to
be cut away from the wall enough to install the irrigation system and plant the
trees;
7.
the
work on conditions #6, 7 & 8 (per the Notification of Final Action for
conditions #2 and 3 above) to commence within 30 to 45 days after final
Commission approval and be diligently carried on until completion;
8.
applicant
to subdivide rear of property adjacent to Darby Avenue into two R-E zoned
residential lots or alternatively into one residential lot with the equivalent
of two R-E zoned lots with a parcel map to be submitted to the County within
one year;
9.
church
building to be single story only;
10.
no
freestanding sign to be located on property (1 wall sign in conformance to
zoning code requirements allowed); and
11. require any structure along Darby Avenue to remain residential.
DESIGN REVIEW for a new place of worship on 2.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the Desert Inn Transition Corridor Overlay. Generally located on the north side of Desert Inn Road, 500 feet west of Torrey Pines Drive within Spring Valley. LB/md/mm/nd
PC
Action - Approved
Waiver of Conditions #3 was withdrawn
That the Board of County Commissioners introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a Standard Development Agreement with Michael C. Gusick Jr. and Heather M. Gusick, and Douglas S. James for a day care center (Daycare Center at Decatur and Oleta).
An ordinance to adopt a Standard Development Agreement with Michael C. Gusick Jr. and Heather M. Gusick, and Douglas S. James for a proposed day care center generally located on the West side of Decatur Boulevard, 150 feet North of Oleta Avenue within the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of Section 24, Township 22 South, Range 60 East within the boundaries of the Town of Enterprise and providing for other matters properly related thereto.
That the Board of County Commissioners introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a Standard Development Agreement with Nevada State Bank for a commercial development (Durango and Arby, a Commercial Subdivision).
An ordinance to adopt a Standard Development Agreement with Nevada State Bank for a proposed commercial development generally located on the East side of Durango Drive and the North side of Arby Avenue within the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) of Section 4, Township 22 South, Range 60 East within the boundaries of the Town of Spring Valley and providing for other matters properly related thereto.
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this
document are solely those of the author.
The opinions state in this document are not the official position of any
government board. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available Clark County Records. This document may be freely distributed and
reproduced as long as the author’s content is not altered. Additional comments maybe added. Additional comments must be clearly
attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the
document. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D.
Chestnut, Sr.