Results
Planning Commission
7:00 P.M.,
Board of
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network(SWAN). You
can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255
(fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
CALL
TO ORDER:
1. Introduction of
2. Request all attendees sign in
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1. Approve the Agenda with any corrections,
deletions or changes. Approved
2. Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
3. Approve the Minutes for the meeting of the
Residential Buffering Sub-Committee held on
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION
1.Clark
County Commissioners will be hosting Town Hall Meetings in their respective
Commission Districts to seek community input on budget priorities for the
upcoming fiscal year. These Town Halls are intended to complement the efforts
of the Clark County Committee on Community Priorities.
Commissioner Steve Sisolak
South Point Hotel & Casino
Brunswick Room
Commissioner Rory Reid
4775 McLeod
Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani
Commissioner Tom Collins
Cora Coleman Community
Center
Commissioner Susan Brager (with
Commissioner Larry Brown)
Commissioner Larry Brown (with Commissioner Tom Collins)
4701
2.
The Clark County Comprehensive Planning Department, effective
January 2010, will no longer send out expiration letters notifying our
customers when their applications are going to expire. This service was
provided as a courtesy, however with the current economic conditions coupled
with budget shortfalls, it has been determined that we can no longer provide
this service.
3.
The solar powered street lights at the corner of Windmill and
ADJOURNMENT:
ATTACHMENT
A
ZONING
AGENDA
1. UC-1153-07 (ET-0319-09) – LVPC BDPS, LLC:
APPROVED
per Staff conditions but change Current Planning bullet #1 to read:
Until
And add a Current Planning condition to
read:
Applicant to establish a direct line of communication with the
interested area residents.
USE
PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review a compost plant in conjunction with a
sand and gravel extraction facility
.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to permit alternative design standards
.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
compost plant on 162.5 acres in an R-U (
UC-1153-07, the
original application for the compost facility was approved by the Planning
Commission (PC) in November 2007. It was
subject to a review of the impacts upon residential properties to the east. The area to the east is developing as a
residential area with the potential for several hundred residents within a
short distance of this facility.
Several area residents are concerned with
odors in the area. There was formal
complaint filed and several calls to TAB members about the odor over the last
year. The compost plant has been in
operation about 2 years, yet the operator stated they are still refining how
the compost is processed. The impression
given to the TAB was this is a work in progress.
The TAB believes there is not enough
information to deny the use at this time.
However, the use does need to be closely monitored. The
The condition for direct communication with
the area residents should accomplish one of two things. First, area residents find the compost
operation is not the source of the odor and accept the project. Second, the compost is the odor source and the
use permit needs to be terminated due to the residential development in the
area and inability to control the odor. The
code enforcement reaction time is too slow to identify the odor noted by the
residents. When the odors occur, the residents end up talking to an answering
machine. The PC routine action item agenda item # 6
2. UC-0645-09 –
The
applicant did not appear
TAB HELD
until such time as the applicant can appear before the TAB
HOLDOVER
USE PERMITS for the
following:
1) An existing place of worship; and
2) An existing day care facility on 3.3 acres in
an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for
the following:
1) Full off-sites (excluding paving) along
2) Eliminate landscaping and screening
requirements to a less intense use.
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following:
1)
An existing place of
worship; and
2) An existing day care facility.
Generally
located on the south side of
3. UC-0680-09
–
TAB DENIED
2-0 Use Permits #1 and #2 due to the proximity of the convenience store to
adjacent residences. (F. Kopriva and J.
Dapper qualified abstention.)
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1)
A convenience store;
and
2) Reduced separation on a portion of 1.8 acres
in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on the
southwest corner of
The TAB decision was based on several
factors. First, this is a 24 hour
operation in a C-1 zone district. Second,
there is a better location on the property for a convenience store. The building on the southeast corner of the
property has the same square footage and use would be shielded from the
residents by the in-line building.
Third, a 24 hour convenience store 15 feet from residents’ backyards is
not acceptable.
The TAB understands economic conditions are
bad and our developers need help.
However, bending the development standards should be done with a great
deal of caution. If we help a developer
by bending the development standards and hurt a neighborhood, a long term
problem has been created. PC routine action item agenda item # 15
4. VS-0677-09 – DEBREMIHRET ST. MICHAEL CHURCH
IN
TAB APPROVED
per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to
5. VS-0695-09 – M
TAB APPROVED
per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON a portion
of right-of-way being the northeast corner of
6. VS-0707-09 – BD PARCEL HOLDINGS, LLC:
TAB APPROVED
per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON easements
of interest to
7. ZC-1406-06 (ET-0313-09) -
TAB APPROVED
per Staff conditions
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1) A water reservoir;
2) Hazardous materials storage;
3) A communication tower; and
4)
All associated
facility uses
.
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following:
1) Water reservoir;
2) Communication tower; and
3)
All associated
facility uses in conjunction with a pump station facility.
Generally
located on the east side of
8. ZC-0656-09 – EL DORADO-VALLEY VIEW, LLC:
TAB APPROVED
Zone Change to C-P
TAB DENIED
Waivers of Development Standards #1 and #2
TAB DENIED
Design Review
The
requested zone change to M-D and the associated Waivers and Design Review are
too intense and intrusive on the existing adjacent low density residential
neighborhood.
HOLDOVER
.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Allow an alternative landscape buffer with an
attached sidewalk along Valley View Boulevard where a landscape buffer per
Figure 30.64-17 or 18 with detached sidewalk is required; and
2) Permit accesses to a local residential street (
DESIGN
REVIEW for an
office warehouse facility. Generally located on the northeast corner of
This is a very controversial item. The applicant wants a zone change to light
manufacturing and to extend the current warehouse east of the parcel. The residents are opposed to this project. They
feel the project does not fit into a residential area.
The applicant has made some changes to the
first design presented. These changes
are based on discussions with SWAN after the neighborhood meeting. However, these changes did not significantly
alter use, size or bulk of the project. It should be noted the original warehouse
buildings to the east were opposed by the TAB as being too intense for the
neighborhood.
The TAB felt this project would be detrimental
to the established residential neighborhood.
The
The TAB is strongly opposed to this project. BCC
agenda item # 20
Additional items to
be heard by the PC or BCC. These items were
previously heard by the
Planning Commission
PC ROUTINE ACTION
AGENDA:
Any person who does
not agree with the conditions recommended by staff or TAB and all applicable
standard conditions for the application type, should request that the item be
removed from this portion of the agenda and be heard separately when directed
by the Planning Commission.
No additional items of interest to
PC AGENDA:
No additional items of interest to Enterprise
Board of
Any person who does not agree with the conditions recommended by
staff, Planning Commission or TAB and all applicable standard conditions for
the application type, should request that the item be removed from this portion
of the agenda and be heard separately when directed by the Board of County
Commission.
12. UC-0591-09 – P J D AND D HOLDINGS,
LLC:
HOLDOVER USE PERMIT for a car
rental facility.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce driveway width in conjunction with a proposed car rental
facility.
DESIGN REVIEW for an existing residential building to be converted to a car
rental facility on 0.5 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) (AE-60) Zone. Generally located on the east side
of
13. VS-0661-09 – GHANDOUR, WALID B.:
VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to
No additional items
of interest to
No additional items
of interest to
ORDINANCES – INTRODUCTION
(These items are for introduction
only. A date and time will be set for a public hearing. No public comment
will be heard at this time.)
That the Board of County Commissioners introduce an ordinance to update
various regulations in the Clark County Unified Development Code (Title 30);
and direct staff accordingly.
An ordinance to amend Title 30, Chapters 30.04, 30.08, 30.16, 30.28,
30.32, 30.40, 30.44, 30.56, 30.60, 30.64, 30.72, 30.76, 30.80 Sections
30.04.040, 30.08.030, 30.16.210, 30.16.230, 30.32.040, 30.32.150, 30.40.290,
30.44.010, 30.76.060 Tables 30.16-5, 30.28-2, 30.28-4, 30.28-5, 30.44-1,
30.56-2, 30.60-1, 30.64-1, 30.72-1, 30.72-3, 30.80-1 and Figure 30.56-3 to
update various land use requirements and procedures and make corrections and
clarifications as appropriate; and providing for other matters properly related
thereto.
No additional items
of interest to
No items of
interest to
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this
document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available
David D.
Chestnut, Sr.