Results
Planning
Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1. Approve the Agenda with any
corrections, deletions or changes. Approved
2. Approve the Minutes for the meeting
held on
3. The classification and treatment of
small grocery markets/specialty markets is not consistent between Titles 8 and
30. The TAB will discuss these inconsistencies
and make recommendations as necessary.
Recommend
the Board of
Authorize
the
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION
1.Has any action been
taken on a public comment from a prior meeting about speed limits on
Arville? It was noted that these prior
comments have been forwarded to the Public Works.
2.A query about the
construction along I-15. The public was
referred to the NDOT project web site:
http:// www.i15southproject.com/
3.Concern about
speeding along Tenaya. The public can
bring up traffic issues to the Metro Traffic Division or at Metro’s First
Tuesday community liaison meeting.
ZONING
AGENDA
SEE
ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC
COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION
The TAB will
schedule appointments with
ADJOURNMENT:
ATTACHMENT
A
1. UC-0074-10 –
APPROVED 4-1(RB) per Staff conditions and:
Design Review as a Public Hearing for lighting and
signage.
Request the applicant brief the Traffic Study
results to the TAB.
USE
PERMIT for a
place of worship with accessory uses.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
place of worship with ancillary buildings on a portion of a 66.0 acre site in a
P-F (Public Facility) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
The proposed place of worship will be
constructed in 3 phases. Phase 1 will consist of a 43,805 square foot, 51 foot
high place of worship (worship center/nursery) and a 23,670 square foot, 44
foot high children’s and administration building. Included within the place of
worship will be a 1,500 seat worship center and nursery area. Phase 2 will
consist of an expansion to the place of worship to increase the seating
capacity to 2,300 seats within the building, a 2-story expansion of the
children’s and administration building, the addition of a 2-story youth
building, and an adjacent parking area. Phase 3 of the proposed development
will consist of an additional parking area only. Access to the site will be
granted from three 34 foot wide curb returns along
The UC-1299-07 (ET-0020-10) –
It seemed to the TAB that the applicant was in
a hurry to get this project off the ground.
The Design Review was excellent in parts and lacking in others. Several questions on design could not be
answered or were ignored in the Design Review. This is a very intense project
in a residential neighborhood which should be thoroughly examined by the
Planning Commission, given the TAB concerns below.
The first concern is the traffic generated by
this project. The only access to the
property is by three curb-cuts on Cactus.
No other exit is available due to surrounding residential construction.
The total parking capacity is 2,031 spaces when the project is complete. The applicant stated the increased parking is
to accommodate one service exiting while the next service is arriving. This could cause peak traffic over a very
short period of time. The TAB was not
sure the three planned driveways along Cactus could handle this volume. One Civil Engineering condition is a traffic
study. The traffic study should include
both projects that will be developed on the 66.0 acres. The TAB has requested
the applicant bring the traffic study results to the TAB.
The second concern is the lighting and
signage. The applicant stated they would
comply with all county development standards.
However, their design review did not include a detailed plan for
lighting and the signage type had not been decided upon. The TAB felt a public hearing was required on
lighting and signage due to the neighborhood’s residential nature. The applicant agreed to this condition.
The third concern is how the church and large
school will coordinate with each other.
What level of shared facilities would occur? The applicant did not have definitive answer
to the degree of coordination and cooperation that would occur between the two
groups developing uses on this site. The
school has an approved design review that will have to be changed because of
this application. It would have been
better to have both applications in front of the TAB at the same time.
The fourth concern is how the landscaping and
walls will be built. The applicant
stated the final grade for this site will be about 10 feet below the
neighbors. Questions were asked about
how the walls would be built and the landscape placed. The applicant did not have an answer.
The applicant did not explain how the grade
difference would affect their plot plan.
The driveways shown could not accommodate a 10 ft grade difference. This site should have the engineering
accompanying the Design Review because of the grade difference. It is another example where why the site
engineering and the traffic study should be part of the Design Review.
The fifth concern is the lack of a children’s
playground. The applicant stated they
did not need one. It is hard to imagine
a facility of this size which serves children that does not need an outside
play area. The placement of playgrounds
is problematic in residential neighborhoods.
The TAB has received complaints about excessive noise from playgrounds
adjacent to residential backyards. PC routine action item agenda item # 10
2. WS-0060-10
– CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL:
APPROVED
per Current Planning conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to exceed the aggregate length for architectural enclosures on the side of
proposed single family homes in conjunction with an approved subdivision on
57.6 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
3. WS-0061-10 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL:
APPROVED
per Current Planning conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to exceed the aggregate length for architectural enclosures on the side of
proposed single family homes in conjunction with an approved subdivision on
110.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on south side of
4. ZC-0380-08 (WC-0038-10) – MAJ
APPROVED
per Staff Conditions and:
Offsite
improvement agreement and/or deed restrictions to be executed. The purpose is to ensure that the off-sites
will be constructed when required by the county in conjunction with future
developments by this applicant, Majestic Enterprise Holdings, Inc., or others.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a
zone change requiring the construction of full off-site improvements in
conjunction with a future expansion of an existing resort hotel (Silverton) in
an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone and an H-1 (Limited Resort and
Apartment) (AE-60) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District. Generally located on the west side of Interstate 15, 1,500 feet south of
This application is still being reworked by
Civil Engineering. The applicant has the
most current copy of the staff agenda sheet which was the basis for TAB
action. The staff is concerned the
off-sites could be developed piecemeal if part of the property is sold off.
The applicant is combining several parcels
into one parcel to facilitate future development of the Silverton. The one vehicle to do this is a commercial
sub-division map. Normally, a commercial
sub-division map is used to divide large parcels into several smaller
pieces. This action usually triggers the
requirement to build or bond the off-site improvements for the project. The Silverton desires to construct the off-sites
as they develop their property. The
Silverton has met all of its previous agreements with the county and the TAB expects
this will be the case in the future. They felt the applicant’s request is
reasonable and the added condition will insure the off-sites will be built. BCC agenda item # 20
5. ZC-0515-09 (WC-0037-10) – MAJ
APPROVED
per Staff Conditions and:
Offsite
improvement agreement and/or deed restrictions to be executed. The purpose is to ensure that the off-sites
will be constructed when required by the county in conjunction with future
developments by this applicant, Majestic Enterprise Holdings, Inc., or others.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a zone
change requiring the construction of full-off sites with development in
conjunction with an existing resort hotel (Silverton) in an H-1 (Limited Resort
and Apartment) (AE-60) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District. Generally located on the east side of
See Item # 4 above.
6. ZC-0062-10 –
APPROVED
per Staff conditions and:
Develop
the project as a gated community
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
multi-family residential complex.
Generally located
between
This is a request for a conforming zone change
for a 10 acre site from R-2 to R-3 zoning for a multi-family residential
complex. The land use designation was changed during last year’s Enterprise
Land Use Plan Major Update. The plans
depict a multi-family residential complex consisting of 178 residential units
with a gross density of 18 dwelling units per acre. The previous approved plan was a small lot
single residential project with no amenities provided.
There was resident opposition to this project. The residents to the south felt that a condo
project was not appropriate for their area and did not fit with their single
residences. The fact that condos can
become apartments was also part of their opposition.
The TAB felt this project was a significant
improvement over the previous project proposed for the site. This project has open space, sufficient
parking, and pool/club house. The TAB
added the condition for this to be a gated community. The applicant agrees with this
condition. They stated they would change
the north entrance to comply with throat depth for a gated entry. The south roadway will be an exit only. This should reduce traffic on Shelborne and
eliminate cut-through traffic. This is
an important consideration due to the high school just to the east of this
project. BCC routine action item agenda item # 12
Additional items to
be heard by the PC or BCC.
These items were
previously heard by the
Planning Commission
PC ROUTINE ACTION
AGENDA:
Any person who does
not agree with the conditions recommended by staff or TAB and all applicable
standard conditions for the application type, should request that the item be
removed from this portion of the agenda and be heard separately when directed
by the Planning Commission.
4. TM-0006-10 – JONES BOULEVARD MARKET PLACE:
TENTATIVE MAP for a commercial subdivision on 2.0 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone in the CMA Design Overlay District. Generally located on the northeast corner of
No additional items of interest to
PC AGENDA:
No additional items of interest to
Board of
Any person who does not agree with the conditions recommended by
staff, Planning Commission or TAB and all applicable standard conditions for
the application type, should request that the item be removed from this portion
of the agenda and be heard separately when directed by the Board of County
Commission.
7. ZC-0989-02 (ET-0201-09) – EAGLE RAINBOW CENTER, LLC:
TAB: APPROVED
(subject to the removal of Current Planning condition for the design review as
a public hearing on final plans).
HOLDOVER
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to permit commercial access onto a
residential street (
8. VS-0706-07 (ET-0192-09) – EAGLE RAINBOW CENTER, LLC:
TAB: APPROVED
HOLDOVER VACATE AND ABANDON FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to vacate a portion of right-of-way
being Rainbow Boulevard located between Mardon
Avenue and Eldorado Lane in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone within
Enterprise (description on file). SS/dg/nd
No additional items
of interest to
22. WS-0013-10 – KB HOME NEVADA, INC:
DENIED 5-0 Waivers of Development Standards 1
& 2;
DENIED 5-0 Waiver of Conditions
HOLDOVER AMENDED WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) reduced rear setback; and
2) reduced perimeter side setback; and
3) reduced garage setback (changed to a
waiver of conditions)
in conjunction with proposed single family residences on approximately
17.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) P-C (Planned Community
Overlay District) Zone in the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community.
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a waiver of development standards (WS-1048-04) for
the following:
1) subject to the revised site plan
dated
2) garage setback being 5 foot on lots
shown on plans dated 08/11/04 and all dead-end and stub streets and alley
(previously not notified); and
3) garage doors being set back on all
remaining lots at 19 feet or greater (previously notified as a waiver of
development standards).
Generally located on the west side of
This application is an example of what is
happening within the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community.
·
Focus has been absent to defend it master plan
·
Builders has have gone bankrupt, land goes to the bank, new
builder buys the unfinished lots
·
Residents very concerned about new home products introduced into
their master planned subdivision.
·
Residents are left in the dark about new home products are under
construction
·
The new home product may not blend in with the neighborhood.
·
Sub-division become something very different from what the
current residents bought into
·
The continuity promised by the master planned community goes up
in smoke
This is another example where Mountain’s Edge
residents are very concerned with the sub-division development.
This product has not produced a neighborhood
that works for the residents. The HOA has banned on street parking. This ban is
a result of emergency vehicles not being able to reach a location where they
are needed. The 5 ft driveways and the
minimal distance between driveways result in significant parking problems. The
roads are narrow with no sidewalks. This sub-division was designed to pack the
greatest number of houses into the sub-division.
The TAB also felt no waivers should be granted
until the project is made more livable for the residents through the addition
of additional parking and open space.
23. WS-0052-10 – SPINNAKER HOMES III, LLC, ET AL:
TAB
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions 4-0 (RB abstained)
HOLDOVER WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to appeal an administrative
application for an extension of time in lieu of an off-site permit in
conjunction with a proposed residential development on 14.2 acres in an R-2
(Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located
on the northeast corner of
Most of the work has been
completed for these off-site improvements.
However, some of the work has to be corrected. The applicant was using profit proceeds of
new home sales to fund the work to fix the off-site improvements that needed to
be corrected. The applicant is
maintaining a bond which guarantees the work will be completed. Civil Engineering did not indicate if the
bond was adequate to complete the work.
The
TAB most likely will see more applications of this type as developers run out
of administrative extensions to complete off-site work. If the developer goes out of business, the
county must be willing to call the bonds to complete the work.
24. WS-0053-10 – SPINNAKER HOMES III, LLC:
TAB A
HOLDOVER WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to appeal an administrative
application for an extension of time in lieu of an off-site permit in
conjunction with a proposed residential development on 20.3 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone, an R-E (Rural Estates Residential)
Zone, an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone, an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone, a C-P (Office and Professional) Zone, a C-1 (Local Business)
Zone, a C-1 (Local Business) (AE-60) Zone, and an H-1 (Limited Resort and
Apartment) Zone. Generally located on the
northeast corner of
See item # 23
No additional items of interest to
ORDINANCES – INTRODUCTION
(These items are for introduction
only. A date and time will be set for a public hearing. No public comment
will be heard at this time.)
31. ORD-0210-10:
That the Board of County Commissioners introduce an ordinance to amend
the Red Rock Design Overlay District to create an exception that would remove
Major Projects on specified land adjacent to but outside the boundaries of the
Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area from the Red Rock Design Overlay
District regulations; and direct staff accordingly.
An ordinance to amend Title 30, Chapter 30.48, adding a new Section
30.48.312 delineating an exception to the Red Rock Overlay District and
providing for other matters properly related thereto.
32. ORD-0206-10:
That the Board of County Commissioners introduce an ordinance and set a
public hearing to consider adoption of an amended Development Agreement with
Mountain’s Edge, LLC, a Limited Liability Company for a 2,582.0 acre
development (Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community).
An ordinance to adopt the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement
with Mountain’s Edge, LLC, A Limited Liability Company for an approximate
2,582.0 acre development generally located on the west side of Rainbow
Boulevard and the south side of Blue Diamond Road within the boundary of
Enterprise and providing for other matters properly related thereto.
No additional items
of interest to
No additional items
of interest to
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project descriptions,
ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available
David D. Chestnut,
Sr.