Results
Note the PC
and BCC meeting dates for each item.
Usually holdover items will be heard the next week and the regular
agenda items will be in three weeks.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.Approve the Agenda
with any corrections, deletions or changes.
Approved
2.Approve the Minutes
for the meeting held on
3.Approve the Minutes
for the meeting of the Residential Buffering Sub-Committee held on
ADJOURNMENT:
ATTACHMENT
H
H-1 VS-0076-10 –
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to Clark County located between Starr Avenue and Southern Highlands Parkway, and
between Valley View Boulevard and Procyon Street and a portion of right-of-way
being Starr Avenue located between Valley View Boulevard and Procyon Street in a P-F (Public Facility) P-C (Planned
Community Overlay District) Zone in the Southern Highlands Master Planned
Community within Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/dr
The applicant wants to convert an approximate
0.3 acre site into a dog park. This was a remnant
parcel of land created when
ATTACHMENT
A
1. UC-0116-10
– 8480 SOUTH, LLC:
Approved
Per Current Planning conditions
USE
PERMIT for
second hand sales in conjunction with an existing retail center on 1.0 acre in
an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone and a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone
within the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located on the northeast corner
of
A zoning boundary splits the lease space with
the majority of the space being zoned C-2 and a portion of the space
(approximately 150 square feet) being zoned H-1. Second hand sales are permitted in C-2 and
not permitted in H-1 zone district. This
permit is required because of the 150 sq ft in the H-1 zone district.
2. VS-0101-10 – ROSA, LUIS A.:
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to Clark County located between the 215 Beltway and Pamalyn Avenue, and between Hinson
Street and Valley View Boulevard in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) (AE-60) Zone within
Enterprise (description on file). SS/jt/dr
This is an interesting case. In the county records, there is a 35 year old
error concerning the vacation of patent easements on this property. It is easier to process this application for
removal of the patent easements than correct the old recording error.
3. VS-0102-10 – B
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to
4. VS-0104-10 – ITALIANO, NELSON P AND CARLETTA
G; SCHWARTZ, GENE L:
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to Clark County located between Richmar Avenue (alignment) and Gary Avenue
(alignment), and between Cameron Street (alignment) and Arville Street in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (AE-60)
Zone within Enterprise (description on file).
SS/jt/dr
5. VS-0112-10 – RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES:
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to
Patent easements are generally vacated in the early stages of
development before a property has been subdivided. However, while conducting an ALTA survey on
the property, it was discovered that the easements remain and must be vacated
in order for the construction of the homes to move forward.
6. VS-0113-10 -
Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON a
portion of right-of-way being Ione Road located between Eastern Avenue and Jeffreys Street in a U-V (Urban Village - Mixed Use) Zone in
the MUD-4 Overlay District within Enterprise (description on file). SS/mk/dr
7. WT-0255-09 (ET-0053-10) – CANFAM HOLDINGS,
LLC:
Approved per Staff conditions and change Major
Projects bullet #1 to read:
· 2 years to complete per
WAIVER FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to extend the time limit for an improvement bond in conjunction
with an existing development in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the
Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan area. Generally
located on the north and south sides of
The bonds for this project cannot be released
until all the houses are built. The majority
of the infrastructure has been built.
Given the slowdown of the real estate market, the TAB felt 2 yrs would
be a better time extension.
8. WS-0114-10 – BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT:
DENIED
per Staff recommendation
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for full off-site improvements (including paving) for a future road alignment
known as Maravilla Grove Way on 20.0 acres in a P-F (Public Facility) P-C
(Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned
Community. Generally located east of
The applicant wants to leave their half of
The neighbors present would like the road to
be completed and lose some of the park features.
The TAB decision was based on several factors.
·
It is highly unusual for no off-sites to be constructed.
·
Other entities adjacent to
·
The approval of this waiver could be used as a legal precedent
to avoid off-site improvements in the future.
·
There is no staff condition for a deed covenant to develop off
sites.
o
The land is currently owned by the BLM
o
It may not be possible to place covenants on federal land.
·
Other than denial, the staff agenda sheet did not provide any
alternatives.
·
The tax payers, most likely, would be responsible for future off
sites costs.
·
The TAB has consistently voted to have the appropriate off-sites
installed.
One TAB member felt the roads’ funds are one budget
line and park funds another. If this
waiver was not next to a park, the question of removing park amenities to
accomplish road construction would not have come up. The applicant seems to be trying
to blur the line between road construction and park construction.
9. WT-0097-10 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC:
Approved per Staff conditions and change Major
Projects bullet #1 to read:
· 2 years to complete per
WAIVER
to extend the time limit for an improvement bond in conjunction with an
existing development in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the
Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan area. Generally
located north of
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D.
Chestnut, Sr.