ENTERPRISE TAB WATCH
Results
October 13, 2010
Planning
Commission 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, November 2, 2010.
Board of County
Commissioners 9:00 A.M., Wednesday, November 3, 2010.
The PC decisions/recommendations
may be appealed to the BCC within five business days of the date of the PC
hearing. Appeal form is found at:
An appeal may be made in
person at the Current Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call
Current Planning (455-4314)
to find out how to file an
appeal. Help in filling an appeal may be
obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you click on the blue
underlined text it will take you to the
detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR BUSINESS
1. Approve the Agenda
with any corrections, deletions or changes.
TAB Approved
2. Approve the Minutes
for the meeting held on September 29, 2010.
TAB Approved with corrections
3. Enterprise TAB to
collect and make recommendations for the Clark County 2011 capital budget.
Held until October 27, 2010 TAB
meeting
1. Clark County
Administrative Services is taking applications for TAB Members for
2011-2012. A hardcopy of the application
is required. Applications are due by 19
Nov 2010. The application can be found
at:
NEXT MEETING DATE
October 27, 2010 6:00p.m.
Enterprise Library
25 E. Shelbourne Avenue @ Las Vegas Blvd. South
ATTACHMENT
A
11/02/10 PC
1.UC-0456-10 – RHODES RANCH, GP:
TAB Approved per Staff conditions
Add Major Projects condition to Use Permit 1a:
Restricted to one single story model only. The applicant will provide the model name.
USE PERMIT for modified residential
development standards in conjunction with a single family residential
development on an approximate 29.3 acre site in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Rhodes Ranch
Master Planned Community. Generally located on the
northeast corner of Fort Apache Road and Sherwood Greens Drive
within Spring Valley and Enterprise.
SB/rk/xx
The TAB is reluctant to
grant blanket use permits that are intended for a limited portion of the
project. Use Permit 1a applies to one of
fourteen models in this development. The
TAB wants to assure the use permit applies only to the one model for which it
was requested. This is the basis for the
added condition. The applicant agreed
with this condition.
2.
UC-0459-10 – DIAMOND WARM
SPRINGS, LLC:
TAB Approved per Current Planning conditions
USE PERMIT to allow a recreational facility (indoor
batting cage facility) in conjunction with an existing office/warehouse complex
on 9.0 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) (AE-65) Zone in the MUD-2
Overlay District. Generally
located on the southeast corner of Dean Martin Drive and
Eldorado Lane within Enterprise. SS/jt/xx
3.
UC-0463-10 – BELL STEWART L
IRA ACCOUNT:
TAB Approved per Current Planning conditions
USE PERMIT for a communication tower on a portion of 2.5 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on
southeast corner of Buffalo Drive and Gomer Road (alignment)
within Enterprise. SB/pd/ed
4.
VS-0453-10 – FIVE ACRE
PARCEL INVESTORS, LLC:
TAB Approved per Staff conditions
Delete Public Works bullets 2, 3, and 4
VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Blue
Diamond Road and Ford Avenue, and between Mohawk Street and Edmond Street in an M-D (Designed
Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay District within Enterprise
(description on file). SS/ar/mb
The applicant and the
staff agreed to the removal of Public Works bullets 2, 3 and 4. These items will be included in the design
review for the property.
5.
VS-0454-10 – RHODES RANCH,
GP:
TAB Approved per Staff conditions
VACATE AND ABANDON a portion of right-of-way being Longboat Key Avenue located between Fort Apache Road and
Sherwood Greens Drive and easements of interest to Clark County located on the north side
of Sherwood Greens Drive and the east side of Fort Apache Road in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Rhodes Ranch
Master Planned Community within Spring Valley and Enterprise (description on
file). SB/rk/mb
6.
WS-0444-10 – SILVERADO
COURT 1, INC:
TAB Approved per Staff conditions
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for an increase in building height in
conjunction with a portion of a single family residential subdivision on 1.0
acre in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the east and west side of Salmon Leap Street,
and the south side of Ranier Peak Avenue (alignment)
within Enterprise. SS/pd/ed
7.
WT-0455-10 – RHODES RANCH,
GP:
TAB Approved 4-1 (Chestnut) per Staff
conditions
Amend Waiver 1b to read:
Allow
building permits for models prior to final map recording.
WAIVER to allow modified improvement standards in conjunction with a single
family development on 29.3 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) P-C
(Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in Rhodes Ranch Master Planned
Community. Generally located on the northeast corner Fort Apache Road and
Sherwood Greens Drive within Spring Valley and Enterprise. SB/rk/ml
The requested waivers
are:
·
Allow early grading.
·
Allow building permits for models prior to final map recording. and allow building permits for models prior to
posting of bond for off-site.
Changed agreed to by the applicant
·
Reduce the minimum dimension from edge of driveway to
back-of-curb return to 1 foot where 12 feet is required (a 92% reduction).
·
Modify the required cross gutter and return improvements.
The TAB
discussion centered on the back-of-curb return (BCR). The following factors were discussed:
·
Line of sight for safety
·
Driveway length, 18 ft.
·
All developer models require the BCR waiver
·
Denial could impose a severe burden on the developer
The majority of the TAB
members were supportive of the developer’s position.
The tentative map is not
an item reviewed by the TAB. This places
the TAB at a disadvantage when looking at residential developments. The TAB is asked to approve waivers without
being able to make recommendations on the entire project. When waivers are requested, the tentative map
should be an item on the TAB agenda. This project is a compact lot development
which has received considerable review by County Commissioners.
It is interesting to
note, this project is subject to three different development codes, Titles 27,
28 and 29. We are using outdated
development codes to build major projects.
11/03/10 BCC
8.
ZC-0369-03
(ET-0154-10) – CASTLE GROUP SERIES I, LLC:
TAB Approved 5-0 Staff conditions
Add Current Planning condition:
Require Design Review as a Public Hearing for significant
changes to this parcel.
Applicant agreed to this
condition.
ZONE CHANGE THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME to reclassify 2.4 acres
from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to C-1 (Local Business) Zone for a
shopping center. Generally
located on the south side of Windmill Lane, 330 feet east
of Buffalo Drive within Enterprise (description on file). SS/al/mb
The plans submitted with
the original application depicted a shopping center covering both the subject
parcels and the parcel immediately to the west, fronting Buffalo Drive. The 2
parcels were and still are under different ownership, but the original application
was submitted as a unified development. However, since the original approval,
the 2 property owners have been acting independently.
The TAB added the design
review as a public hearing due to the following:
·
Two owners operating independently
·
Property could be developed as separate projects
·
The current design review could be superseded by market
conditions.
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this
document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be
freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not
altered. Additional comments maybe
added. Additional comments must be
clearly attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced
with the document. The additional
comments author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group
must be clearly identified. This
attribution statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.