Results
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes Approved
2.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
3.
Discuss and make recommendations as required on AG-0967-10
The
APPROVED:
TAB HELD the
discussion indefinitely:
4. Review
and discuss Enterprise TAB bylaws and take action as required.
The bylaws were discussed with the inputs from
Administrative Services and Board members reviewed. The TAB agreed to take two actions.
1. The
bylaws will be placed on the
2. The
bylaws will be appended to the
APPROVED:
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
It is time to update your links to the
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. There
was a question about land reserved for the
2. Neighborhood
Specialty Grocery Markets was reviewed by the Liquor and Gaming Commission on
·Not less than five hundred square feet, nor more than two
thousand square feet of floor space
·Operate during the hours of
·
Provide
for the on-premise consumption of prepared foods and grocery items at tables,
booths, or a counter by patrons
·The display size restriction was dropped due to the size
restriction.
3. A
member of the public noted that the start time of the TAB meeting is
incorrectly noted in the Review Journal newspaper as
HOLDOVER/RETUNRED
Applications
H-1. WS-0620-10 – MORLEY, COREY & SALLY:
No Applicant
APPROVED:
HELD until the
applicant can reschedule.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for reduced setbacks in conjunction with a proposed 8 lot single family
residential subdivision on 1.0 acre in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
This
applicantion was on the
ATTACHMENT
A
1. UC-0008-11 – DEBREMIHRET SAINT MICHAEL
ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHDO CHURCH IN LAS VEGAS, INC:
APPROVED: HELD for the applicant to conduct a neighborhood meeting.
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1. Allow a place of worship.
2. a.
Reduce the front setback for the principal structure to 15 feet where a minimum
of 40 feet is required (a 62.5% reduction).
b. Reduce the comer side street setback for the
principal structure to 10 feet where a minimum of 15 feet is required (a 33.3%
reduction).
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to allow non-decorative walls adjacent to a less intensive use.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
place of worship on 1.3 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
The applicant has not conducted a neighborhood
meeting prior to the TAB hearing. The
neighbors were under the impression that a neighborhood meeting would be held prior
to any plans being presented to the TAB.
The TAB felt a neighborhood meeting is appropriate given the history and
location of this project. The TAB
requested the applicant hold this application until the
2. UC-0009-11
–
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
ADD a Current Planning condition:
• 6 month
review as a Public Hearing
USE
PERMIT to allow
a place of worship in conjunction with an existing shopping center on 28.7
acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay
District. Generally located on the north side of Serene Avenue and
the west side of
This use permit is for
3. UC-0015-11 – NEVADA POWER COMPANY:
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
USE
PERMIT to
reduce the separation between communication towers.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
communication tower and associated equipment on a portion of 9.5 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located on the west side of
4. VS-0019-11 – HARMONY55, LLC:
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
VACATE
The TAB agreed with the applicant’s request
for the vacation. The plan shows the
vacation of a driveway apron located on
This vacation does not impede the equestrian
trail along
The discussion centered on the proper material
to be used where the trail crosses between the roadway and the project
entrance. This material should allow
sufficient footing for horses to cross safely and provide a surface acceptable
to the neighborhood residents. It
appears that there is no county standard for this purpose.
5. WS-0017-11 – TAGGARD,
APPROVED: HELD until the
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduced side yard setback; and
2) Reduced rear yard setback for an addition
to an existing single family residence on 0.5
acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
6. WS-0018-11 – HARMONY55, LLC:
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to allow non-standard improvements (brick pavers) within a private street in
conjunction with an approved single family residential subdivision on 27.5
acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
7. UC-1730-05 (ET-0005-11) – MONARCH GRAND
VACATION OWNERS ASSOC:
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
USE
PERMITS SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME to commence the following:
1) increased building height;
2) Hotel rooms with kitchens;
3) Timeshare units;
4) Future condominiums;
5) Shopping center uses;
6) A recreational facility;
7) A day spa;
8) Restaurants;
9) Live entertainment in conjunction with a
restaurant; and
10) Allow on-premise consumption of alcohol in
conjunction with a restaurant.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
multiple building expansion to an existing resort hotel timeshare/condominium
(Cancun Resort) on 15.4 acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in
the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally
located on the southwest
corner of
8. ZC-0952-08 (ET-0001-11) – BANK OF
APPROVED: per Staff conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review the following:
1) Eliminate landscaping; and
2) Off-site improvements (excluding paving)
on 5.1 acres in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing)
Zone. Generally located on the south side of
9. TA-0007-11 – SIEGEL COMPANIES, INC:
APPROVED: per
Preliminary Staff Conditions
RECOMMENDED:
This
use be allowed in zone districts C-2 and H-1
This
use is not compatible in zone districts M-D, M-1, U-V, and R-5
Text
amendment: to amend Title 30, Chapter 30.08, Table 30.44-1
(Chapter 30.44) to create a new development code category for extended stay
units in certain zoning districts subject to a minimum one-week stay and
complete kitchens being provided.
The TAB supports the staff recommendation to
draft an ordinance and schedule public hearings to amend Title 30. The amendment would add long/short term
lodging use with conditions to Title 30.
The TAB opinion is the following zone districts
are not appropriate for this new use.
·
R-5: TAB agrees with the staff position and
reasoning
·
M-D,
M-1:
o
These
are industrial zone districts that should not have a residential use
component.
o
The
possibility of residential use in these areas may discourage businesses
locating there.
o
The
mixing of industrial and residential uses can create safety or environmental
hazards.
o
The
current Title 30 does not mention residential in the description of these zone
districts.
o
Our
code should be removing possible obstacles to new industrial uses in the
valley.
·
U-V:
o
This
zone district is permitted by the MUD overlay.
o
The
MUD overlay in
o
The
reasoning for M-D and M-1 applies to the U-V zone district.
o
In
addition, in
10. ZC-0030-11 – FRIAS, PHYLLIS M., ET AL:
APPROVED: per Current Planning If approved conditions
The
land involved in this request is broken down as follows:
·
40%
·
40% owned by the applicant or owners in
favor of the change
·
20% of owners who have been contacted
but not responded
There
was no public opposition to this request.
The staff is opposed to this application because it changes the land use
planning done during the major land use update in 2009. Also, the expansion of the RNP-1 overlay
would place higher density uses around the new RNP-1 overlay area. The current buffer would become part of the
new overlay.
The
land owners stated their desire to have their land included in the RNP-1
overlay to help protect a rural life style.
If this application is approved, the owners will have to seek a land use
plan amendment in the June – July 2011 time frame to match the overlay to fully
protect their area.
One
TAB concern was the land owners’ desires who had not responded. They have been notified by the County and the
applicant has attempted to contact them.
They will have a chance to remove their property from the overlay at the
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.