The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
HOLDOVER/RETURNED APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal. Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
1. Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes APPROVED
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
1.Commissioner Sisolak’s liaison noted, in response to inquiries at the previous two TAB meetings, that the pavement markers on the corner of Decatur and Robindale were due to work being done by Southwest Gas and pavement stripping.
2.The staff has not responded to questions on land being removed from the Western Trails park plan.
H-1 WS-0620-10 – MORLEY, COREY & SALLY:
HELD by the applicant to the
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for reduced setbacks in conjunction with a proposed 8 lot single family
residential subdivision on 1.0 acre in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
1. UC-0052-11 – PIAZZA, LLC:
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions.
PERMIT for a recording
studio in conjunction with an existing shopping center on a portion of 4.4
acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay
District. Generally located on the southeast corner of
2. UC-0055-11 – NV ENERGY, ET AL:
APPROVED per Staff conditions.
USE PERMIT for public utility structures and overhead lines.
public utility structures and overhead lines on a portion of 74.0 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (AE-65) Zone, an M-D (Designed Manufacturing)
(AE-65) Zone, an H-2 (General Highway Frontage) (AE-65) Zone, and an H-1
(Limited Resort and Apartment) (AE-60 & AE-65) Zone with a portion in the
MUD-2 Overlay District. Generally located on the south side of
APPROVED per Staff conditions:
The TAB strongly recommends the Waiver of Conditions for access on Blue Diamond be granted.
DESIGN REVIEW for signage and lighting for an approved convenience store.
OF CONDITIONS of a
zone change (ZC-0552-10) requiring no access to Blue Diamond Road on 3.3 acres
in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone and a C-1 (Local Business) Zone in the MUD-4
Overlay District. Generally located on the southwest corner of
Waiver of conditions is the significant part
of this application. Access to
Maverik submitted an excellent lighting and signage plan. The plan provides excellent lighting with little spill over into the residential areas. The applicant was given suggested lighting standards by the TAB during the original application process. All the suggestions were incorporated in their plan. One area the applicant had a question about was the florescent lighting trim around the building. The TAB agreed the building would look better with trim on all sides of the building. However, this was not incorporated into a condition of approval.
4. ZC-0051-11 –
APPROVED 4-1 (Andoscia nay) per Current Planning conditions and following changes: with the above noted change and addition.
ADD Current Planning condition:
• Design review as a public hearing for significant changes to the plan.
REVIEW for a
retail center in the MUD-1 Overlay District.
on the north side of
A letter was submitted to the TAB by a resident north of this project. Their request was the application be turned down. The resident would prefer the land remain as open space to serve as a buffer. The TAB discussion focused on the intensity of the uses allowed.
One side felt that C-2 zone district and associated uses are acceptable adjacent to the north residential area.
The other opinion is the C-1 zone district would allow the applicant to develop the project while providing some measure of buffer for the residents with less intense uses.
The factors considered by the TAB were:
· The applicant had pervious C-2 zone district on the property which expired
· The housing to the north was built after the original zone district was granted.
· A large casino project is planned south of Bruner.
· Bruner was reduced from an arterial to a local street as part of the casino application.
· The area has changed since the original application (2000)
· The applicant’s intended uses are retail.
· The more intense uses could be granted by special use permit.
· Resident opposition.
· The building design was appropriate for the area.
· Dottie’s across the street blocks a tavern use.
The TAB added the condition for a design review as a public hearing. If the C-2 zone district is granted and the property changes hands, the design review would allow for a public comment on any new projects