Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes Approved
2.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
·
A
citizen offered suggestions to upgrade the quality of the audio recordings of
the TAB meetings. He suggested that
either hardware and/or software could be of better quality and asked that the
county provide better equipment to the TAB.
·
A
citizen is concerned about the impact the Desert Express rail system will have
on the area between Cactus and Tropicana on the west side of I-15. He suggests that another route should be
considered.
·
Trails
staff will be asked to attend the next TAB meeting to advise the community on
work being done in the area around
ZONING
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENT:
HOLDOVER
APPLICATIONS
H-1 WS-0620-10 – MORLEY, COREY & SALLY:
HELD to
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for reduced setbacks in conjunction with a proposed 8 lot single family
residential subdivision on 1.0 acre in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
ATTACHMENT
A
1. VC-0203-91 (ET-0020-11) – MORTENSEN
PROPERTIES, LLC:
APPROVED
per Staff if approved
conditions
ADD Current Planning conditions:
• Design Review as a Public Hearing for
significant changes;
• Review of
Waiver on
VARIANCES
FIFTH EXTENSION OF TIME
to complete the following:
1)
Permit 6 foot high
chain link fencing within a corner sight zone where 2.5 feet high is permitted;
and
2)
Waive the 6 foot
minimum depth of landscaping along the
in conjunction with a plant nursery including a
1,250 square foot commercial building and a future greenhouse.
WAIVER for off-site improvement requirements on 1.0
acre in an H-2 (General Highway Frontage) Zone.
Generally located
on the east side of
The Extension of Time only applies to the off-site
improvements waiver. The owner has not
been able to install the required off-sites due to the current business down
turn. The TAB was concerned with and
discussed the following:
·
The
landscape Use Permit is valid until
·
During
the last land use plan, the area south of Cougar was planned for residential
·
The
current zoning is H-2
·
The
current traffic demand is adequately accommodated with the current road
configuration.
·
The
off-sites are built in the future
·
Residential
is abutting to the south and west
The Public Works condition for a restrictive
covenant allows the County to demand the off-sites be installed in the
future. The TAB recommended two
additional conditions. First, a design
review as a public hearing because the current H-2 zone district could allow a
different business to be established on this property. The public hearing would help ensure compatibility
with the abutting residential. Second,
the waiver review date brings the use permit and the waiver in sync. The
applicant agreed to both conditions.
2. VS-0078-11 – SILVER CREEK I, LLC:
APPROVED per Staff conditions
VACATE
3. UC-0287-09 (ET-0217-10) – PETERSEN SOUTH
DEVELOPMENT, LLC:
APPROVED
per Current Planning
conditions
ADD Current Planning condition:
• Design
Review as a Public Hearing for significant changes.
HOLDOVER
USE PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review outside storage to be stacked above the height of the
screen wall in conjunction with an existing storage yard on 4.6 acres in an M-1
(Light Manufacturing) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
This area is in transition. The Pinnacle Peaks Master Plan designated the
area around this storage yard as light manufacturing. However, residential development has been
slowly reducing the manufacturing area.
The TAB added a recommendation for a Design Review as a public hearing
to help ensure compatibility with the surrounding residential. The applicant agreed to this condition.
4. VS-0057-11 – RANDALL, GEORGE & DARLENE
REVERSIONARY TRUST:
APPROVED
per Staff conditions
VACATE
5. WS-0056-11
– RANDALL, GEORGE & DARLENE REVERSIONARY TRUST:
The Town Board approved the application per staff
conditions with recommendations as follows:
·
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1): APPROVE
·
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 2): ALLOW
·
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3): APPROVE
·
WAIVERS
OF CONDITIONS 1): APPROVE
·
WAIVERS
OF CONDITIONS 2): DENY
·
WAIVERS
OF CONDITIONS 3): APPROVE
ADD Public Works condition:
• Right-of-way
dedication per requirements of ZC-0897-06, VS-0899-06
Motion APPROVED
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Increased wall height;
2) Allow alternative off-site improvements (curb
and gutter type);
3) And reduced street off-set.
WAIVERS
OF CONDITIONS of a
zone change (ZC-0897-06) requiring the following:
1) Access to the paseo and 15 foot wide easement
be provided along the north and south sides of the development site, if easement
is required;
2) Right-of-way dedication to also include up to
40 feet for Tenaya Paseo/drainage right-of-way; and
3) Driveway length to be a minimum of 20 feet
in conjunction with a proposed single family
subdivision on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
This item generated significant discussion
between the applicant, residents and the TAB.
The central point of contention is what standards should be applied to
the outparcels in Mountain’s Edge. The
Tenaya Paseo/drainage has been developed to eighty feet with landscaping and
other open space amenities. The applicant
would prefer to not dedicate land to paseo and use the land for additional houses.
The
TAB was concerned with and discussed the following:
·
The
·
This
property will set a precedent for other outparcels within the Mountain’s Edge
Master Plan area.
·
The
Paseo is open space for the area residents
·
The
applicant stated the project would have an HOA
·
Public
Works does not want responsibility for this section of the Paseo
·
The
standard practice in Mountain’s Edge is the open space is the responsibility of
the HOA
·
In
Mountain’s Edge, open space is landscaped by the developer and turned over to
the HOA.
·
The
park fees collected will go to the County general fund not the Mountain’s Edge
park fund.
·
Reduced
Paseo width may present repair problems for the Mountain’s Edge Master HOA
·
Residents
to the east were expecting an 80 ft. Paseo and may have paid a premium for
their lots.
The
TAB opinion is the standards established for Mountain’s Edge should be
maintained to produce consistent neighborhoods.
Outparcel development must be consistent with those standards. The Tenaya Paseo should be consistent
throughout its entire length in design and width. The Waiver of Conditions #2 should not be
granted.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.