Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the application header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes Approved
2.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
3.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
4.
Receive a report from Nancy Lipski, Director, Clark County Comprehensive
Planning, on Application Time Limits, Commencement and Studies.
The Board of County Commissioners has directed
the planning staff to look at possible changes to Application Time Limits,
Commencement and Engineering Studies.
The interested parties in the industry have been consulted and their
concerns noted. To date, the Director
has reported her findings to 9 TABs/CACs and will visit the other 10. The TABs/CACs have provided input to the
Director. Later this summer, a report
will be given to the
Industry position:
·
There
is general opposition to advanced engineering studies.
·
The
developers do not want the expense of engineering studies prior to entitlements
being granted on the property.
·
Lending
institutions are unwilling to lend money prior to entitlements being granted.
TAB/
·
There
is no unified position among the TABs/CACs.
·
Some
TABs/CACs see no need for change.
·
Some
TABs/CACs would prefer engineering studies with the land use application.
·
Some
TABs/CACs would like to use a project progress measurement as a commence standard.
Discussion:
·
Hard
to establish a realistic commence point.
o
Using
building permits does not guarantee progress on a project
o
Good
for two years and can be renewed
·
One
TAB suggested an annual progress review
o
Establish
a progress measure on percentage of completion.
o
Could
overload the TABs in the next upturn
·
The
TABs/CACs and other decision makers may find engineering studies helpful in
making valid recommendations
o
The
minimum would be a preliminary grading study to determine fill and building
placement.
o
Suggestion
of a minimum threshold of grading change that can occur.
·
Traffic
study is of secondary importance.
·
Extension
of time conditions
o
Is
defined in Title 30 and can be changed by the
o
The
second extension of time should have more stringent criteria and justification
since circumstances have almost always changed.
o
Allow
project termination without sufficient progress.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
HOLDOVER
APPLICATIONS
H-1 WS-0620-10 – MORLEY, COREY & SALLY:
Held to
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for reduced setbacks in conjunction with a proposed 8 lot single family
residential subdivision on 1.0 acre in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
This application has been on the TAB agenda
since
ATTACHMENT
A
1. UC-0170-11 – VECCHIONE, PAUL:
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1)
Allow a temporary
dwelling (manufactured home) prior to the construction of the principal
dwelling (single family residence);
2) Allow a temporary dwelling (manufactured home)
prior to issuance of a building permit for the principal dwelling (single
family residence); and
3)
Allow an accessory
building (garage) prior to a principal use
on 1.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
The applicant had a several personal setbacks
that have resulted in the delay of this project. The applicant stated the following:
• The
garage will be used to store building materials for home construction.
• He
has house plans that need to brought up to current residential code
• The
one year time limit is sufficient to obtain the building permit with update
plans.
The TAB would like to see this property
upgraded to match the surrounding neighbors.
One year should give the applicant sufficient time to update the
residential plans and obtain a building permit.
The TAB advised the applicant that new residential building codes go
into effect
2. UC-0693-07 (ET-0047-11) – SHORT
APPROVED
per Current Planning
conditions
ADD Current Planning Condition:
Design Review as a public hearing for significant
changes to plans
USE
PERMITS SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME to commence the following:
1) Reduce the separation from a convenience store
to a residential use; and
2)
Reduce the separation
from a car wash to a residential use.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
shopping center on 2.0 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
The TAB requested and the applicant agreed to
the added Current Planning condition.
This condition was added due to the time transpired since the original
application. The conditions in the area
are changing and any significant change to plans should have a public review.
3. ZC-1291-06 (ET-0044-11) – SHORT
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.