Results
The ATTACHMENT A items
will be heard on the following dates:
Planning Commission
7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header. See H-1, H-2
and 1 for hearing dates
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue
underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to
explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1. Approve the Agenda with any corrections,
deletions or changes. APPROVED
2. Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
The Planning Commission
will not have a quorum on July 5. Items
slated to be heard that night will be heard on July 7.
COMMISSION DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES
After receiving citizen input
through public hearings and other means over the last two weeks, the County is
unveiling proposed new boundary lines for Clark County Commission districts and
seeking more input at a public meeting Wednesday, July 6 at
The meeting will be held in the
Commission Chambers at the
Then the public will have another
opportunity to review the proposed changes and provide comment about them
during an open house at the
ZONING
AGENDA
HOLDOVER
APPLICATIONS
H1. UC-1143-06 (ET-0054-11) – FINKELSTEIN,
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions
USE
PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review exceeding the time limit for a temporary outdoor
commercial event to include a temporary tent in the parking lot in conjunction
with a retail use (Boot Barn) on 0.9 acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and
Apartment) (AE-65) Zone. Generally located on the
west side of
The original plans depicted a temporary outdoor event with a 300
square ft. tent on the east side of the Boot Barn parking lot. The event takes
place annually during the National Finals Rodeo and Professional Bull Riders
Rodeo, from the middle of October until the middle of December. The temporary event has taken place on the
site since 1997 without any issues. The
TAB agreed with the staff to make the use permit permanent.
H2. VS-0197-11 –
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
This item was held by the TAB because public works had not added
their conditions to the staff agenda sheets and the TAB did not want make a
recommendation with incomplete data. The
county easements were added during the last two weeks to the public works
conditions for the three roads affected by this application.
ATTACHMENT
A
1.WS-0620-10 – MORLEY,
COREY & SALLY:
DENIED
HOLDOVER
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for reduced setbacks in conjunction with a proposed 8 lot single
family residential subdivision on 1.0 acre in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the north side of
The plan shows a proposed 8 lot subdivision. Seven of the lots
will have a 4 foot wide side yard setback on both sides. The eighth lot has a 4
foot wide side yard setback on one side and a 10 foot wide side yard setback on
the other side. The applicant stated
they could build two story homes without the waiver. However, the submitted plans show the two
story models require the setback waiver.
This is another case of a developer who wants to waive county standards
rather than develop a project that will maintain the standards.
The TAB agreed with and supports the Staff position. Staff cannot support the setback reduction
because the request is a self-imposed hardship and not a result of site
constraints. The proposed lot widths or design of the homes could be revised in
order to meet the side yard setbacks.
This site could be divided into seven lots which would meet all the
setback requirements with the proposed single story model.
2.UC-0222-11 – CONDOS,
GEORGE & PHYLLIS C.:
HELD for
USE PERMIT
to allow clients or customers to come to a residence for a proposed home
occupation (Homeowner’s Association office) in conjunction with an existing
residence on 0.4 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located 135 feet east of
3.UC-0237-11 – PENNY, MONICA L:
APPROVED
with following
conditions:
Use Permits:
1.
For
three months
2.
Denied
3.
For
three months
4.
If
stalls are required to be moved they will be placed as far away from the
neighbor as possible.
ADD Current Planning conditions:
Any extension of time will require a public
hearing.
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1) Increase the number of horses;
2) Eliminate landscaping;
3) Reduce pasture area; and
4) Reduce the area of stalls
in conjunction with an existing single family
residence on 0.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
The plans show an existing single family
residence that fronts the cul-de-sac to the east. A 2,500 sq. ft pasture area and three, 100 sq.
ft covered stalls are located on the southwest corner of the site behind the
house. The existing stalls are constructed with metal fencing and roofing. The
pasture area is surrounded by metal fencing similar to the stalls.
This application had significant neighbor
opposition. The neighbors opposed the
application for the following:
·
Excessive
flies
·
Odors
·
Placement
of the stables
·
Number
of horses on the property
·
Poor
care of the horses
·
Neighborhood
CC&Rs (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) that prevent large livestock.
The stables are located on the property line
with the neighbor to the south. This was
a poor choice of location and may cause some of the neighbors’ complaints.
The TAB recommendation considered the
following:
·
The
TAB felt the property was suited for two horses only
·
Three
months should be sufficient to complete the treatment of the rescue horse and
find it a home
·
With
two horses the pasture area should meet Title 30 standards
·
The
landscaping should be installed.
·
The
stable may not have sufficient setback
·
If
the stable is moved it should be located as far as possible from the neighbors.
·
If
the stable is moved increase the stable area to meet Title 30 Standards.
Neither the TAB nor the County has any control
over CC&Rs and cannot resolve this problem between the neighbors. If the CC&Rs was not recorded to run with
the deed to the land, it may not be legally enforceable.
4. UC-0242-11 – KAROUM, SAMIR J.:
Approved per Current Planning conditions
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1.) Increase the number of horses to 27 for a
residential boarding stable where a maximum of 24 horses are permitted (a 9% increase)
2.) Delete the requirement
to provide one tree per 50 linear feet along the side (north) property line (a
100% reduction).
in conjunction with a proposed residential
boarding stable on 2.3 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the southeast corner of
This well-equipped facility can accommodate
the additional horses without a problem.
The area where the landscaping is required is currently paved as part of
Chartain. This
portion of Chartain has been vacated and replaced
with a cul-de-sac. The TAB felt
landscaping along the north property line is not required.
5.
WS-0247-11 –
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions
ADD Current Planning condition
Detached sidewalk along Warm Springs
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Waive
2) Waive
3) Waive loading spaces.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
data center on 17.5 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone in the
There was some confusion with this
application. There were previously
approved waivers when the building to the northeast was built. The questions is do they apply to the
building under review? This will be
reviewed by the County staff.
The plans show a building with a maximum
height of 43 feet 10 inches constructed with tilt-up panels and a metal bowed
roof. Three metal roll-up doors are shown on the south side of the building.
The building is 1,052 feet long and runs parallel
The building is designed to protect the
computer equipment inside. The roof is
one long arc which does not meet the
The TAB added the condition for a detached
side walk along Warm Springs. Warm
Springs is a major thoroughfare and the detached side walk is safer for
pedestrians.
6.
ZC-0246-11 –
APPROVED per Current Planning conditions
ADD Current Planning condition
Detached sidewalk along Warm Springs
Parking
lot light poles not to exceed 10 ft. in height
DENIED
Waiver of development
standard #3
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Allow attached sidewalks where detached
sidewalks are required;
2) Provide no loading spaces; and
3) Provide no parking lot landscaping.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
data center. Generally
located on the south side of
This the same building design presented in Item #5. There are two principle differences between
the applications. This building is
outside the
It should be noted that there were no residents to speak for or
against this application. The building
will be over 200 ft. to the north of the residential area with the parking area
between the residents and the building.
The proposed landscaping will provide some buffer; however, a building
of this size and the height of the wall will impose a significant barrier for
the residents to the south. The TAB felt
the parking lot landscaping would provide some additional buffer for the
residents. The TAB, also, recommended
the parking lot light poles be not higher than 10 ft. This would keep the lighting level the top of
the 10 ft. high perimeter wall.
The south perimeter wall will be 4 in. or 30 in. or more from
the existing residential wall. This
could form an empty space that could cause problems in the future.
The TAB added the condition for a detached
side walk along Warm Springs. Warm
Springs is a major thoroughfare and the detached side walk is safer for
pedestrians.
The TAB also, suggested the walking path on
the east side of the residential area be continued along the east side of the
project.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.