Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date indicated.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1. Approve the Minutes for the meeting
held on
2. Approve the Agenda with any
corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS NONE
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
Last August Mr. Cederburg informed the TAB
that Rainbow construction would start in 2nd quarter 2012 if Focus did the
construction or 3rd quarter if the County did the construction. What is the current status? What is the status of negations with UPRR on
the at-grade crossing?
ATTACHMENT
A
1.
DR-0200-12 – O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES, INC:
APPROVED
per plans presented and
staff conditions
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
freestanding sign and wall signs in conjunction with an approved auto parts
store on a portion of 4.0 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on the northwest corner of
The original plans show a 17.5 fool high,
approximately 80 square foot double sided illuminated pole sign setback 20 feet
from
2. ZC-0162-12 – VAC BARN, LLC, ET AL:
APPROVED
· Zone change to C-1
ADD Current planning conditions:
· Design Review for lighting and signage as a public
hearing.
· Design Review as a public hearing for significant
changes to plans
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce the height setback ratio from a
residential use; and
2) Allow alternative landscaping.
DESIGN
REVIEW for an
office building. Generally located on the east side of
The plans show a 12,149 square foot office
building on the western portion of the site and a 972 square foot storage
building on the eastern portion. An outside storage area is located adjacent to
the east property line and will accommodate three vehicles.
This area is changing from a Rural
Preservation Neighborhood to a
The applicant has designed the property for
two tenants, a U.S. Department of Agriculture test facility and a survey
business, both of these tenants can be accommodated in a C-1 zone district. The applicant agreed to the TAB’s request to
zone this property as C-1. This will
provide some protection for adjacent residents.
The after looking at the project plans the TAB
agreed with both of the Waivers of Development Standards. The reduction of the landscape to zero occurs
at one south side corner and does not significantly affect the surround
property.
The TAB recommended a Design Review for
lighting and signage that were not part of this application. Also, recommended is a Design Review for
significant change to plans. Both recommendations
are to help protect the remaining area residents.
3.
UC-0193-12 – JWS VENTURE, LLC:
APPROVED
CHANGE Current Planning bullets as follows:
· Bullet #1 to read: 7 months to commence and review
as a public hearing
· Bullet #2 strike
USE
PERMIT for a
food cart/booth (shaved ice) not located within an enclosed building in
conjunction with a convenience store on 1.1 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
This application generated discussion in two
areas. First, is this use permit
appropriate for this location? Second,
accessory uses proliferation beyond the property original approvals.
This is a seasonal small business. The food cart/booth is a 44 square foot
self-contained trailer and the operator will stand inside the trailer to
prepare and sell the shaved ice.
TAB determined the booth current location is
the best available on the property. The
north side of the convenience store is handicap parking and there for is not
suitable. Placement in front of the
convenience store could result in traffic congestion and pedestrian safety
problems.
The applicant desires to have this use permit
reviewed well before the next summer season.
This will allow plans to be adjusted in time for next season. The TAB recommended the shorter review time
to accommodate the applicant’s request.
The second item is not part of this
application. It is a concern that
exterior accessory uses are being added to business without a coordinated
County policy. The factors considered by
the TAB are:
· The does the exterior accessory uses add or
subtract from the Design Review approved for the property.
· How may are allowed
· For what period of time
· What are the vehicles and pedestrian safety
requirement?
· What are the Design Standards
The TAB should make this an agenda item and
forward a recommendation to the
4.
VS-0192-12 – VITRUVIAN PROPERTIES, LLC:
APPROVED per staff recommendations
VACATE
5. DR-0201-12
– GMD
DENIED
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
fast food restaurant with drive-thru and a retail development on 0.8 acres in a
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally
located on the west
side of
This application was denied because the
applicant was not able to provide information on grading and was not willing
hold the application to bring a preliminary grading plan to the TAB.
Factors affecting this property:
· This property has a significant elevation
change, up to 6 ft.
· The grading will add or remove a significant
amount of soil
· The final finished floor elevation will affect
how the Design Review and traffic flows are evaluated
· The TAB is looking at the traffic flows and
cross access for all four properties on this corner
· The applicant representative was not aware of
how their design would affect the other properties
· Applicant stated we do not have room for a
ramp in our design.
· Is additional retaining wall needed?
· How does the design effect on the adjacent
residential
There was very little discussion of the actual
design because that applicant was not able to answer the grading question. The applicant opinion is this design meets
all County standards and should be approved.
The grading question can be settled after the design is approved. However, there was little concern by
applicant over how the design affected surrounding residential and commercial
property. The applicant’s representation
did not agree with the TAB’s view that all commercial in this location needs to
be looked at as a unit.
Without grading information, the TAB could not
determine how the design affects surrounding property.
Signage, lighting, building design and traffic
flows on the property were not thoroughly discussed.
One course of action would be to require a
preliminary grading plan and the design review to be sent back to the TAB for
review. This property is an excellent
example of why a preliminary grading plan should accompany an application.
6. UC-0645-09 (ET-0047-12) –
APPROVED per staff recommendations
USE
PERMITS SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME to review the following:
1) An existing place of worship; and
2) An existing day care facility,
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for
the following:
1) Full off-sites (excluding paving) along
2) Eliminate landscaping and screening
requirements to a less intense use.
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following:
1)
An existing place of
worship; and
2) An existing day care facility
on 4.3 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located
on the southwest corner of
7. UC-0730-09 (ET-0048-12) –
APPROVED per staff recommendations
USE
PERMITS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review the following:
1) Accessory structures which are not architecturally
compatible with the principal building; and
2) A school (K-3) in conjunction with an existing
place of worship.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
storage building in conjunction with an existing place of worship and day care
facility on 4.3 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
8. UC-0175-12 –
HELD by the applicant until
USE
PERMIT to allow
temporary classrooms that are not architecturally compatible with the principal
structure.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for
the following:
1) Modular buildings with flat roofs not screened
with parapet walls; and
2) Mechanical equipment on modular buildings to be
unscreened.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a use
permit (UC-0730-09) to limit school to Kindergarten through Grade 3.
DESIGN
REVIEW for
temporary classrooms in conjunction with a place of worship on 4.3 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located
on the southwest corner of
9. WS-0204-12 – HURLEY’S NURSERY ENTERPRISES,
LLC:
APPROVED
bond extension until
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to appeal the administrative denial of an off-site improvement bond extension
of time in conjunction with a plant nursery on 4.1 acres in an M-1 (Light
Manufacturing) Zone. Generally located on the northwest corner of
This bond is for the improvement of
Gomer. At present there is no project in
the area that would require Gomer to be paved for access. The calling of this bond would result in a
paved section of Gomer that connects to dirt on both sides.
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.