Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
NOTE: the change to the
Check
the
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue
underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to
explain the agenda item.
CALL
TO ORDER:
Pledge
of Allegiance:
Introduction
of
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.Approve the Agenda with any corrections,
deletions or changes. APPROVED
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT:
HOLDOVER APPLICATIONS
H-1. UC-0175-12 –
Motion to approve was defeated 2 – 3
Motion to DENY was passed 4 - 1
If approved conditions:
·
Review
as a public hearing in six months
·
Design
review as a public hearing to include all planned and anticipated structures
within six months
·
Complete
the land scape buffer on the southern property line prior to modular building
installation
USE
PERMIT to allow
temporary classrooms that are not architecturally compatible with the principal
structure.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for
the following:
1) Modular buildings with flat roofs not screened
with parapet walls; and
2) Mechanical equipment on modular buildings to be
unscreened.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a use
permit (UC-0730-09) to limit school to Kindergarten through Grade 3.
DESIGN
REVIEW for
temporary classrooms in conjunction with a place of worship on 4.3 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located
on the southwest corner of
The school expansion on the church property is
extremely controversial. The TAB, after
extensive testimony and discussion, focused on the following:
·
There
is no publically approved plan for the entire property.
·
Once
the modular buildings are approved it is very difficult for the county demand
their removal.
·
Once
in place, it is highly improbable that the
·
Future
school demand could result in both permanent and modular buildings being used
for classes.
·
The
surrounding neighbors are very opposed to the use of modular buildings in the
RNP.
·
The
church’s needs are being favored over the adjacent residents.
·
The
church’s piecemeal development has resulted in a lack of trust in any plan
presented by the church.
·
The
church’s steadfast refusal to consider off site alternatives until a permanent
building is constructed has added to the questions on future intentions.
The piecemeal development approach has created
a conflict between the neighbors and the church. The neighbors feel the church pushed its way
into a residential neighborhood with ever increasing commercial
activities.
The TAB based its recommendations on the
following:
·
Any
expansion approval should be based upon an approved design review for the
entire property.
·
Any
expansion must be done in permanent buildings.
·
The
church’s refusal to consider alternative solutions.
·
Modular
buildings are not appropriate in residential areas.
·
The
removal of the modular buildings by a given date is not guaranteed by this
application.
·
Previous
construction forecast by the church was not accurate.
·
Future
expansion in modular buildings, after the permanent building is constructed, is
possible.
·
The
requested expansion does not adequately protect the area residents.
·
The
outside play area is not adequate for the school purposes.
·
Placement
of the modular buildings may not leave sufficient room for permanent building construction.
·
Items
settled in the initial negotiations, 4 years ago, are surfacing again. i.e.
access on Gagnier
The TAB majority felt the piecemeal expansion
requests should be halted at this time.
The current request could result in a long period of modular buildings
being used within a residential area.
This expansion should be done in permanent buildings as a part of a
strategic plan. The area residents must
have reasonable assurance that their neighborhood will not be harmed. The current request does not accomplish that
goal.
ATTACHMENT
A
1. UC-0133-11 (ET-0056-12) – MC-2
APPROVED
USE
PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence outdoor dining.
VARIANCE to reduce parking.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
retail building consisting of a specialty grocery store, general retail uses,
restaurants, and banquet facility with an open reception garden on 4.9 acres in
a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located on the northwest corner of
2. UC-0215-12 – UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF
CARPENTERS:
APPROVED
USE
PERMIT for a
communication tower.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Increased tower height; and
2) Reduce the separation between communication
towers.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
communication tower and supporting ground based equipment in conjunction with
an existing training facility and proposed parking structure on a portion of
1.0 acre in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) (AE-60 & AE-65) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
There is an existing 105 foot high
communication tower approximately 224 feet to the southwest that will be
replaced by this proposed request and removed once the proposed tower becomes
operational.
3. UC-0220-12 – CRUMLEY, DAVID:
APPROVED
USE
PERMIT to
increase the area of an accessory apartment.
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following:
1) Maintain a relocated single family residence
over 5 years of age; and
2) Permit an accessory apartment
in conjunction with a proposed single family
residence on 1.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located 280 feet south of
The TAB was concerned about a rental apartment
in the RNP. The County code allows a
rental apartment in the RNP as long as the owner lives on the same
property. The applicant was advised on
the County probation on rentals of less than 30 days.
APPROVED
USE
PERMIT to allow
a retail pharmacy in conjunction with an existing pharmaceutical company on a
portion of 1.5 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-3 and
This request is for a portion of the north
building. The building contains an existing 11,000 square foot pharmaceutical
company that consists of ancillary office space and is proposing a 200 square
foot walk-in retail pharmacy area where individual prescriptions are filled and
dispensed to clients.
5. VS-0225-12 –
APPROVED
ADD condition to Public Works
·Insure legal access is provided to property between this property
and
VACATE
6. WS-0229-12 – TWITCHELL, GARY L. &
APPROVED
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduced setbacks; and
2) Allow an alternative roof design
in conjunction with an addition to an existing
single family residence on 0.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential)
(RNP-I) (AE-60) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
7. WS-0253-12 – BEAZER HOMES HOLDINGS CORP:
APPROVED
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce the rear setback for 3 lots in conjunction with a single family
subdivision on a portion of 34.1 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Mountain’s Edge Master
Planned Community. Generally located on the west side of
8. UC-0250-12 – MAULE JONES
REALTY, LLC:
APPROVED
USE PERMIT to allow vehicle
(automobile) repair.
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS
of a zone change (ZC-2006-03) requiring recording perpetual cross access,
ingress/egress, and parking easements with the property to the west.
DESIGN REVIEW for a vehicle
(automobile) sales facility with outside display areas and vehicle (automobile)
repair and maintenance facility on 5.0 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone
in the MUD-3 and
9. WS-0249-12 – SOUTHWEST
REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
reduce the landscape area along the 215 Beltway frontage road (
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
vehicle (automobile) sales showroom facility with outside display areas on 2.4
acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) (AE-60) Zone in the MUD-3 and
10. ZC-0248-12 – MAULE JONES REALTY, LLC:
APPROVED
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce the landscape area along the 215 Beltway frontage road.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
parking lot in conjunction with an automobile sales facility. Generally located on the south side of Roy Horn Way, the north side of
Pama Lane (alignment), and 660 feet west of Redwood Street within Enterprise (description on file). SS/dg/xx
(For possible action)
11. WS-0256-12 –
APPROVED
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce lot area for parcels within an approved single family residential
subdivision on a 1.6 acre portion of a 10 acre development in an R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a
waiver of development standards (WS-0601-10) requiring a minimum of 17,200
square foot lots approved only on Lots 6 through 15, all other lots must be a
minimum of 18,000 square feet. Generally
located on the
southwest corner of
This application was somewhat confusing. It is a case were a new project affect a
project in progress. The current project
was required to collect and handle water flows from the west on their
property. This was accomplished by
placing the western block wall approximately 5 feet inside the property line. The five feet outside the block wall is used
for drainage.
The applicant is in the process of purchasing
property to the west of the current project.
This new project is being designed as an R-1, 3 units per acre. The
approval of this application would remove approximately 5 feet from the current
project and add it to the new project.
The result is a single block wall along the boundary between
projects. If the application is not
approved the result will be an approximately 5 foot wide by 550 long area
between to walls. This is not a
desirable result.
If the new project does not go forward this
waiver would not take effect.
12. WS-0259-12 – BANK GREAT WESTERN, ET AL:
WITHDRAWN
BY THE APPLICANT
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduced setbacks;
2) Reduced street width;
3) Reduced intersection off-set; and
4) Non-standard off-site improvements.
DESIGN
REVIEW for
modifications to an approved single family residential development on 10.0
acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay
District. Generally located on the west side of
The
statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely
those of the author. The opinions stated
in this document are not the official position of any government board,
organization or group. The project
descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly
available
David D. Chestnut, Sr.