ENTERPRISE TAB WATCH

Results

August 1, 2012

 

The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the following dates:

 

Planning Commission 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, August 21, 2012.

Board of County Commissioners 9:00 A.M., Wednesday, August 22, 2012.

 

HOLDOVER/RETURNED APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.

 

The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the BCC within five business days of the date of the PC hearing.  Appeal form is found at:

 

 Clark County Appeal Form

 

An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271).  Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.  Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN).  You can contact SWAN at:

 

702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email:   swan@lvswan.org

 

Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.

 

REGULAR BUSINESS

 

1.  Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on July 11, 2012.  APPROVED

 

2.  Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes.  APPROVED

e

PUBLIC COMMENTS:  NONE

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS:

 

Community Development Advisory Committee

 

TAB is looking for a representative and an alternate from Enterprise to serve on the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC).  The nominations will be made at the August 15, 2012, Enterprise TAB meeting.

 

The purpose of the committee is to meet the needs of low to moderate- income groups through decent housing, developing viable communities and neighborhoods, and promoting economic growth. Representatives will work with staff in developing project selection criteria, reviewing proposals, holding public hearings, and making project recommendations to the County Commissioners.

 

Contact the TAB secretary for more information.

 

Telephone: (702) 361-2341 / Fax: (702) 361-2341

E-mail: ediekaye@embarqmail.com

 

The LVMPD Enterprise Area Command would like to invite everyone to National Night Out!

 

The Event will be held at Desert Breeze Park on Aug 7th at 6pm.  Our 1st Tue Event will not be held at the station it will be at the Park. Come meet your neighbors and enjoy Free Food, Entertainment, Music and visit with community businesses who have set up booths of free School supplies and free products. Please forward, post, invite friends, family etc. to this wonderful community event.  If you have any questions please give me a call.

 

Bella Yourgules-Scholes ICPS

Crime Prevention Specialist

Enterprise Area Command

6975 W. Windmill Lane

Las Vegas NV 89113

702-828-5804

B7845Y@LVMPD.COM

 

ZONING AGENDA:

         SEE HOLDOVER APPLICATIONS and ATTACHMENT A

 

ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

 

Receive a report from the Enterprise Town Advisory Board Committee on RNP Traffic Mitigation.  Held until August 15, 2012 TAB meeting.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS:   NONE

 

NEXT MEETING DATE:  August 15, 2012

ADJOURNMENT: 

 

ATTACHMENT A

 

08/21/12 PC

 

1.UC-0320-12 – DUNEVILLE, LLC:

APPROVED

ADDED Current Planning condition:

The east boundary to be a block wall, if not already in place.

 

USE PERMIT for a communication tower.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a monopalm communication tower and associated ground equipment on 2.3 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone.  Generally located on the east side of Duneville Street, 330 feet south of Robindale Road within Enterprise.  SS/rk/ml  (For possible action)

 

The Staff agenda sheet indicated the east boundary is a 12 ft. high chain link fence.  The chain link fence is not appropriate for this site.  The land along the eastern boundary is planned for single family housing.  The applicant believes the east boundary is already a block wall and their plans show a block wall around the ground equipment.  The applicant is willing to build a block wall if not already in place.

 

08/22/12 BCC

 

2.      DR-0326-12 – KB HOME DIAMOND RANCH EST, LLC:

APPROVED per staff conditions

ADD Current Planning condition:

·   If more than 2 feet of fill is required, as Design Review, a public hearing is required.

ADD Public Works conditions:

·   Waive the requirement for street lights on Ullom, except for the pull boxes and conduit.

·   No street lights on the private streets. The applicant to use coach lighting on the houses.

REQUEST the applicant brief the drainage study to the TAB when completed.

DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential subdivision on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.  Generally located on the west side of Ullom Drive, 300 feet south of Robindale Road within Enterprise.  SS/mk/ml (For possible action)

 

The following are part of the staff conditions for this application:

·      Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 to be single story homes

·      8 ft high block walls along Lots 5 thru 8 on the north property line, and an 8 ft high block wall for Lots 8 and 9 along the west property line

·      Opaque windows on the west side of the building for lots 9 and the rear of the building for lot 4

 

There are two aspects to this application. First, the land use conditions have time limits to be started/completed, or they will expire.  The zoning maps and grading/infrastructure plans do not.  The result is the infrastructure can be put in place with no consideration to current conditions in an area, even though the Design Review they were based upon has expired.  This can limit significant design changes in a new Design Review for the property.  The staff agenda sheet did not contain any information on what infrastructure was completed.  This complicated the TAB discussions.

 

Second, there is a significant land use history on this property.  The purpose of the conditions is to protect the adjacent neighbors.

 

DR-1089-04

·   The TAB recommended several of the lots be combined and single story homes be placed next to the large lot homes north and west of the site. This recommendation was not accepted by the BCC.

·   The BCC placed the three conditions, listed above, on the development.

WC-0185-07

·   TAB denied

o        The waiver of conditions was imposed in Sep 2004 by the BCC.  The TAB felt the conditions that required these restrictions had not changed, and as a result, are still required.   

·   BCC Approved

o        The three conditions listed above were again imposed by the BCC.

WS-0675-07

·   The reduced setbacks did not included Lots 5, 6, 7, & 8.

 

The original plans, modified by the BCC in 2004, restricted homes along the north and west borders of the property to a single story.  No setback waivers were granted.  This was done by the BCC, again, to protect existing residences, which includes a compound housing exotic animals (APN-177-07-301-003).

 

The TAB opinion is the adjacent neighbors still needed the protection agreed to during the 2004 BCC hearing and reaffirmed at the BCC 2007 hearing.  The circumstances around this project have not changed since 2004.

 

The applicant should place single story houses on the specified (Lots 5, 6, 7, & 8) lots without waivers.  If that cannot be done, the lots in question should be remapped to accommodate single story houses without waivers.  This was the original TAB recommendation in 2004.

 

The question of how the drainage is handled on the property and the effects on downstream properties was raised.  The TAB added the condition for a new Design Review if more than two ft of fill is required.  Also, The TAB requested the applicant brief the drainage study when it is complete.  This is another example of why drainage and grading plans should be submitted with the Design Review.

 

The area residents would like to see Ullom developed as a rural street.  However the curb is already installed and the sidewalks are ready to be poured.  The only part not ready to go is the street lights.  The TAB added the condition to waive street lighting along Ullom except for conduit and pull boxes.

 

The applicant stated they do not want to use street lights on the private streets as shown on the approved infrastructure plans.  They want to accomplish the lighting with coach lights on the houses.  The TAB, as part of the Design Review, recommended no street lights on the private streets.  If street lighting is required, full cut off fixtures should be used to prevent spillover to the adjacent residences.

 

3.      UC-0321-12 – YOUNGMARK PROPERTIES, LLC:

HELD by the applicant until August 15, 2012 TAB meeting.

 

USE PERMIT to allow unscreened outside storage.

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Reduced setback;

2) Eliminate landscaping requirements; and

3) Off-site improvements in conjunction with a temporary industrial storage yard on 2.5 acres

 

in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay District.  Generally located on the northwest corner of Ford Avenue and Jones Boulevard within Enterprise.  SB/mk/ml (For possible action)

 

The TAB reviewed the waivers being requested.  The applicant is willing to bring the property up to Title 30 standards.  The TAB requested the owner provide a work schedule to comply with code.  The hold is a result of the schedule request.

 

4.      WS-0329-12 – COUNTY OF CLARK (AVIATION):

HELD by the applicant until August 15, 2012 TAB meeting.  The applicant did not have a plot plan or elevations for the Design Review.

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Allow alternative landscaping; and

2) Waive enhanced paving along pedestrian circulation routes.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a parking lot on 1.0 acre in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone in the CMA Design Overlay District.  Generally located on the north side of Capovilla Avenue and the west side of Edmond Street (alignment) within Enterprise.  ss/pb/ml  (For possible action)

 

The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely those of the author.  The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of any government board, organization or group.  The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not altered.  Additional comments maybe added.  Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the document.  The additional comments author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be clearly identified.  This attribution statement must accompany any distribution of this document.

David D. Chestnut, Sr.