Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NZC-0011-12 Non-conforming Zone Boundary
Amendment
The applicant is proposing a zone change from
C-2 to R-4 to allow for a 302 unit multi-family development at
Windmill Library
For more information contact Jennifer
Lazovich,
702-792-7000
jlazovich@kcnvlaw.com
PRESENTATION:
Presentation
by Clark County Water Reclamation District - Update on the
This project is in the initial planning
phase. A summary is below:
This is a13 mile long project - part of it in
The proposed route:
·
Terminates
at Valley View and Serene
·
North
along Valley View to Wigwam
·
East
along Wigwam, under I-15 to
·
North
along
·
East
along Eldorado
The project will install large diameter pipe
25 to 40 ft. deep.
The project phase three in
BUREAU
OF
The Bureau of Land Management (
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
Nominate a representative and an alternate from
The TAB appointed the following individuals:
·
Primary
representative: Peter Sarles
·
Alternate
representative: Steve Makar
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT:
ATTACHMENT
A
1.VS-0385-12 – VAC BARN, LLC, SHEPARDSON FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
2.ZC-0261-10
(WC-0098-12) – ST. SHARBEL MARONITE
CATHOLIC TR:
APPROVED
per staff if approved
conditions:
ADDED
Public Works condition:
·
Rancho
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a
zone change requiring the construction of full off-sites in conjunction with an
expansion of an existing place of worship on 2.1 acres in a P-F (Public
Facility) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
This church is surrounded by Rural
Preservation Neighborhood. Except for
the public school located directly south of the church, there are no off-sites
installed in this area. The TAB opinion
is off-sites, except for paving, are not appropriate at this time.
This application points out the need to update
Title 30 to ensure uniform standards within the RNP-1 overlay. Currently, Title 30 requires full off sites
for a commercial project. Public Works
considers the church as a commercial project.
This is used as the basis to require full off-sites even when they are
not appropriate to the area. There is no
Title 30 exception when the project is located in or adjacent to the RNP-1
Overlay.
3. UC-0257-02 (ET-0070-03) (WC-0097-12) – ST SHARBEL MARONITE CATHOLIC TR:
APPROVED
per staff if approved
conditions:
ADDED
Public Works condition:
·
Rancho
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of an
extension of time of a use permit requiring off-sites to be completed with
Phase 3 in conjunction with an existing place of worship on 2.1 acres in a P-F
(Public Facility) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
This church is surrounded by Rural
Preservation Neighborhood. Except for
the public school located directly south of the church, there are no off-sites
installed in this area. The TAB opinion
is off-sites, except for paving. are not appropriate at this time.
This application points out the need to update
Title 30 to ensure uniform standards within the RNP-1 overlay. Currently, Title 30 requires full off sites
for a commercial project. Public Works
considers the church as a commercial project.
This is used as the basis to require full off-sites even when they are
not appropriate to the area. There is no
Title 30 exception when the project is located in or adjacent to the RNP-1
Overlay.
4.ZC-0375-12 –
USA/NAVADA HOUSING DIVISION:
APPROVED
per staff conditions and
plans shown with the following:
ADD Current Planning Conditions:
·
No
balconies on the west and south sides
·
Design
review as a public hearing for lighting and signage
USE
PERMIT for a
senior housing development.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce the front yard setback;
2) Reduce the setback from a public right-of-way;
3) Reduce the height setback ratio; and
4) Increased wall height.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
senior housing development. Generally located on the south side of
This item generated considerable discussion
and a number of suggested conditions.
Most of the suggested conditions concerned who could live in the
proposed project. These conditions are
not enforceable land use conditions by the County and therefore not considered
by the TAB.
The TAB focused on three areas:
·
Is
the project appropriate for the location?
·
Is
the zone district request appropriate?
·
Is
the building design/mass appropriate?
Senior housing is appropriate in this
location.
The TAB questioned the need for the R-5 zone
district. The surrounding residential is
zoned for R-3 with 2 story compact unit development, apartments and condos. The
TAB recommended the R-4 zone district be granted. One concern is the R-5 zone district would
remain if this project is not built. The
R-5 zone district would allow a much larger project to be built on the
site. A larger project is not
appropriate for this location.
It appears the R-5 was requested to avoid a
waiver for building height. The R-5 zone
district allows building to 50 ft. or up to 100 ft. with a special use permit
and greater than 32 units per acre. The
R-4 zone district allows senior housing up to 39 units per acre, with building
heights to 35 ft. The applicant can meet
the unit density with R-4; however they would need a waiver for building
height. The R-4 zone district is the
best fit for this area.
The building mass was questioned by the TAB. Along the west and south property line, the
building appears as a solid wall with little to break up the building
mass. A project with more open space
between the buildings would be more appropriate for the area.
The neighbors requested no balconies on the
west and south side of the project and the TAB agreed.
Lighting and signage were not part of the
application design review nor discussed by the applicant. The TAB added the condition for a public
hearing for these items.
Note: Title 30 senior housing conditions:
1. Density. The
maximum density of the residential development may be increased as follows:
a. R-3 and C-2:
maximum 22 units per gross acre.
b. R-4: maximum 39
units per gross acre.
c. C-1: maximum 18
units per gross acre.