Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the application header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
Companion
items:
5. VS-0536-12
- TODARO, MARIA:
7. ZC-0535-12
– TODARO, MARIA:
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Clark County Administrative Services is taking
applications for TAB Members for 2013-2014.
The application and required bio can be submitted by email. This a recent change to the application
process. The application can be found
at:
http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/Depts/admin_services/tlservices/Documents/TOWNAPP%20(2).pdf
CLARK
COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Invites the citizens to our Town Hall
Meeting
Clark County Building Department
Presentation Room
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS: NONE
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
ADJOURNMENT:
ATTACHMENT A
1. WS-0352-12 – GRIMM NORTON 1, LLC:
APPROVED per Staff conditions
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Comply
with the Southern Highlands Design Guidelines with respect to aesthetics and
overall appearance from street frontage.
AMENDED
HOLDOVER WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce the perimeter setback.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
multiple family residential development on 20.0 acres (previously notified as
12.9 acres) in an R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a
design review (DR-0165-12) requiring development to be consistent with Southern
Highlands Design Standards. Generally located between
The buildings facing
The TAB added condition to ensure the
street frontage aesthetics will maintain continuity with the Southern Highlands
Design guidelines.
One item was clarified by the
applicant. The staff agenda sheet stated
the following: “The plans show 2 building types within the
development. The first type is a 3 story, 35 foot high,“mansion style” building.
The second building type is 2 stories and 30.5 feet high traditional multiple
family style building.” The staff write
up is the opposite of the actual plan. The
two story buildings around the perimeter are the “mansion style” and the three
story interior buildings are more traditional apartment style as presented in
previous plans.
2. UC-0518-12 – AMAZING RAINBOW, LLC:
HELD
until
USE
PERMIT for
outside dining in conjunction with a proposed restaurant.
VARIANCE to reduce parking.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
shopping center on 8.8 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the Pinnacle
Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located on the southeast corner of
3. UC-0520-12
– PJD&D HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
CHANGE Current Planning condition #1 to read:
·
Six
months to complete with any extension of time to be a public hearing;
USE
PERMIT for a
car rental facility on 0.5 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) (AE-60) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
The business has changed owners and the new
owner required the use permit to have the Building Department approve his
plans. The applicant stated he could
finish the required work in much less than a year. The TAB felt a shorter time period is
appropriate.
4. VC-1282-04 (ET-0106-12) – ADAVEN
MANAGEMENT, INC:
DENIED
(3-1)
VARIANCES
THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME
to commence the following:
1) Reduced lot depth; and
2) Reduced lot size on 5.0 acres
in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in
the
The staff recommended denial of this
application. Other than the zone change,
there are no active permits or maps for this property. The applicant’s representative stated that
there is an intent to proceed with the property development in the near future. Also, a TAB denial would be responsible for a
$500 per house price increase, however no data were presented to back this
statement up.
Applications for the Use Permit and Tentative
Map will need to be submitted and approved before this project can go
forward. TAB considers waivers without
current plans to be a poor way to do business and a bad precedent. Also, the
waiver is eight years old and may not be appropriate in todays’ market.
5. VS-0536-12 - TODARO, MARIA: Companion item # 7
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
6. ZC-0526-12 –
Approved
with the following:
CHANGE
the Waiver of
Development standard #1:
Up to 8 foot retaining wall may be used
ADD Public Works conditions
·
Waive
off-sites for Neal, except for paving
·
Neal
to be developed as non-urban road standards using
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Increase wall height; and
2) Increase the length of a cul-de-sac.
Generally located on the east side of
The development will utilize the existing
planned land use Residential Medium designation to reclassify the property from
The primary concern was the retaining walls height
and length required on this project. The
retaining walls are required because the sewer connection to be used is located
on Placid and the land slopes away from Placid.
No retaining wall is required on Neal. On
Neal is developed to non-urban road standards
on the south side and the TAB recommends the north side be developed to the
same standard.
The applicant stated they could use coach
lighting on the cul-de-sac instead of street lights. This would be appropriate for the area.
7. ZC-0535-12 – TODARO, MARIA: Companion item # 5
APPROVED per staff conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce the off-set between street
intersections; and
2) Increase the length of a cul-de-sac.
Generally located on the south side of
This an infill project. There was neighborhood opposition to the
density of this application. Their
request was to match the lot size adjacent to the applicant's property. The adjacent property is zoned R-2 that was
developed with approximately 10,000 sq.
ft lots.
The TAB considered the following:
·
The
R-1 zone district requested is a lower zone district than the surrounding
property
·
The
project density is greater than the actual surrounding density.
·
The
proposed density is slightly higher that the surrounding density.
·
The
land use would allow R-2 zone district
The TAB requested the developer work with the
current residents to procure permission to attach new block walls to the
current boundary walls. This would
prevent building redundant walls within a residential area.