Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
Introduction of
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
Agenda Items 1 & 3 are companion items and will be heard
together
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1.Clark County Administrative Services is taking
applications for TAB Members for 2013-2014.
The application can be found at:
http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/Depts/admin_services/tlservices/Services/Documents/TOWNAPP%202012.pdf
2.
3.Rock 'n' Roll
http://runrocknroll.competitor.com/las-vegas
4. Three items from the
September 26 Enterprise TAB meeting, which incorrectly noted the Enterprise TAB
meeting location and time will be re-noticed and sent back to the October 31
Enterprise TAB meeting and will be heard at the November 7 Board of County
Commissioners Zoning meeting. The items
were: ZC-0523-12; ZC-0535-12; and VS-0536-12.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS NONE
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
H-1. UC-0518-12 – AMAZING RAINBOW, LLC:
APPROVED per Staff conditions and plans as presented
ADD Major Projects condition:
• Design Review as a
public hearing for permanent signs.
USE PERMIT for outside dining in conjunction with a proposed
restaurant.
VARIANCE to reduce parking.
DESIGN REVIEW for a shopping center on 8.8 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located
on the southeast corner of
This application was held by the applicant to provide the
TAB with more information on drainage and the amount of fill that would be
required.
The TAB was concerned because the property slopes approximately
10 feet from west to east. The water runoff
is toward Mardon. The applicant stated the following:
·
The existing block
walls will be used, no redundant wall.
·
The water flows
along the eastern boundary from the next property south. This prevents the applicant from using fill
along the eastern boundary.
·
The buildings,
located along the eastern boundary, finished floor height, will be
approximately the same as the houses along the eastern boundary.
·
The southern
landscape buffer will be a ten foot wide, intense landscape buffer.
The TAB was satisfied that fill used would not significantly
raise the commercial buildings well above the surrounding residential buildings.
Signage was not part of this application and the TAB
added a request for a public design review.
The TAB appreciates the efforts the applicant took to provide
the preliminary grading and drainage data.
ATTACHMENT A
1. NZC-0564-12
– TOCK-
DENIED
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduced lot area; and
2) Permit non-standard street improvements
in conjunction with a proposed single family
residential development. Generally located
on the south side of
This application is strongly opposed by the
neighborhood.
The applicant's representative was not able to
offer any compromises or condition changes.
The land owner priced this land for sale based upon the condition that
40 homes be built. Richmond American
Homes were the high bidder. The nature
of the contract does not allow any compromise during the land use process. This is not the best way to approach a
non-conforming zone change.
The TAB is firmly opposed to this zone change
and lot size reduction for several reasons.
The staff’s compelling justification analysis
did not consider or was not accurate in the following:
·
The
area along Windmill has not substantially changed since the last major land use
update.
·
The
other non-conforming zone changes adjacent to the RNPs have been to R-1 with
10,000 sq. foot lots along the RNP boundary.
·
Previous
applications approved along the RNP boundary have required 10,000 sq. foot lots
and single story houses.
·
Reduction
in R-2 lot size is counter to the trend for increased lot sizes being presented
in applications over the last year.
·
The
deed-restricted land along Windmill was not considered in the analysis of how
the area could develop.
The TAB concluded there are insufficient
changes in the area to warrant a non-conforming zone change and the trend for approved
non-conforming zone changes in
The TAB also considered the following:
·
Neighborhood
opposition to small lot development on the RNP boundary
·
28 of 40 (70%) lots require the Waiver of
Development Standards for reduce lot size.
·
The
applicant's lack of ability to compromise or accept changes.
·
This
project does not provide an adequate buffer to the RNP.
·
The
current commercial land use designation along Windmill allows for coherent
development.
·
The
deed restricted land prevents a significant part of the area from becoming
residential.
·
Given
the deed-restricted land, this application is spot zoning.
·
The
entire area along Windmill should be addressed in the next major land use
update.
·
If
the
The TAB has consistently supported using
10,000 sq. ft. lots and the R-1 zone district along the RNP boundaries. This project does not meet that
standard. At this time, a 5 acre medium
density, and residential project does not fit in this location could lead to an
inappropriate mixture of commercial and residential. When more is known about
the direction of deed restrictions and the
2. VS-0563-12 –
APPROVED per Staff conditions
CHANGE Public works Condition #2 to read:
·
Reserve
out a 20 foot easement to
VACATE
The applicant was not aware of the Public
Works conditions placed on the application.
The TAB members had received the Public Works update several days before
by email. The requirement for an
easement to
3. VS-0565-12 – TOCK-
DENIED
VACATE
4.
ZC-0551-12 – REGIONAL
APPROVED per Staff conditions
This
application is a zone change without plans.
The staff analysis and resulting conditions help ensure the future
development will fit into the neighborhood.
The staff conditions require the following:
·
Design review as a public hearing on
final plans to include signage and lighting;
·
Provide an intense landscape buffer,
per Figure 30.64-12, along the south property line.
5.
ZC-0552-12 – REGIONAL CACTUS, LLC:
APPROVED per Staff conditions
This
application is a zone change without plans.
The staff analysis and resulting conditions help ensure the future
development will fit into the neighborhood.
The staff conditions require the following:
·
Design review as a public hearing on
final plans to include signage and lighting.
·
Provide an intense landscape buffer,
per Figure 30.64-12, along the south property line.
·
Maximum building height of 27 feet.
·
Record a perpetual cross-access
easement with the adjacent lot to the east.
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
author’s content is not altered. Additional
comments maybe added. Additional
comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those comments and
published or reproduced with the document.
The additional comments author’s affiliation with any government board,
organization or group must be clearly identified. This attribution statement must accompany any
distribution of this document.
David
D. Chestnut, Sr.