Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED with following changes:
Related application to be heard together
3. UC-0615-12 – DANIEL G & M FAMILY, LP, ET
AL:
12.
ZC-0614-12 – DALE, DANIEL
Additional Business will follow the zoning
agenda
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Clark
County Administrative Services is taking applications for TAB Members for
2013-2014. The deadline for submitting
applications is
http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/Depts/admin_services/tlservices/Forms/TOWNAPP%202012.pdf
2. Rock
'n' Roll
http://runrocknroll.competitor.com/las-vegas
PRESENTATION;
The Regional Transportation Commission (
Regional Transportation Plan 2013-2035 Draft
Transportation Improvement Program 2013-2016
Draft
Transit Program of Projects 2013 Draft
The entire plan can be viewed and comments
submitted on the
Pursuant to the Public Participation Plan, the
Regional Transportation Plan 2013-2035, Transportation Improvement Program
2013-2016, and Transit Program of Projects 2013 will be available for public
review and comment for 45 days between October 12 and November 26 by
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
Finalize
capital budget requests for 2013. (For
possible action)
HELD until
ZONING
AGENDA:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT:
HOLDOVER
APPLICATIONS
H-1. UC-0577-12
–
Use Permit DENIED
Design Review
APPROVED
CHANGE Current Planning condition bullet # 1 to read:
·
Relocated rollup door(s)
to north or west elevations and painted to match the accessory structure
ADD Public works conditions:
·
Windows to be installed
on east and south elevations
·
Current shed will be
removed when the accessory structure is completed.
USE PERMIT for an accessory structure not compatible with the
principal structure.
DESIGN REVIEW for an accessory structure (storage building) in
conjunction with a place of worship on 4.3 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
The accessory building is necessary due to an agreement
with the neighbors. The Good Samaritan has
agreed not to use temporary classrooms to accommodate their school. The church uses one building for their school
and worship area. This results in an
equipment change out when the functions are switched. Currently, the equipment not in use is stored
outside. The accessory structure will
provide a way to protect their equipment.
The new accessory structure will also, allow for the removal of the
current storage shed.
Once this accessory building is built, it is not likely
that it will be removed. The TAB opinion
is any permanent structure design should conform to the rest of the
property.
After the first TAB hearing, all parties met to discuss
the accessory building. At that meeting the TAB conditions were discussed and agreed
to. One item brought up was to ensure the
accessory building will be big enough to accommodate equipment currently stored
in the non-conforming shed.
The applicant has agreed to the TAB conditions.
ATTACHMENT
A
1. DR-0636-12 –
APPROVED per staff condition
DESIGN REVIEW for a maintenance yard on 1.3 acres in a P-F (Public
Facility) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Southern
Highlands Master Planned Community.
Generally located on the
south side of
2. UC-0193-12 (ET-0123-12) – JWS VENTURE, LLC:
APPROVED per staff condition with the following change:
CHANGE Current Planning Bullet # 1 to read:
·
Until
USE
PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to review a food cart/booth (shaved ice) not located within an
enclosed building in conjunction with a convenience store on 1.1 acres in a C-2
(General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
The applicant has honored all the agreements
she made with the TAB. There have been
no complaints about this cart and it has not caused any parking lot
congestion. Several of the TAB members
have passed this site on a frequent basis and note no problems.
The TAB opinion is some review is required
over a long period. A one year review is
too short. The TAS discussed review periods ranging from 3 years to a permanent
use permit. Five years was the
compromise position.
3. UC-0615-12 – DANIEL G & M FAMILY, LP,
ET AL:
HELD by the applicant to
USE PERMIT for a day care facility.
DESIGN REVIEW for a day care facility including a playground area on 1.5
acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located
on the south side of
4. UC-0625-12 –
APPROVED per staff condition
USE PERMIT to allow the sale of packaged liquor within an existing
pharmacy (Walgreens) in conjunction with a shopping center on a portion of 1.7
acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone.
Generally located on the
west side of
5. WS-0543-12 – GRAFIADA, ENRIQUE &
KAMI:
APPROVED per staff conditions
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce the front
setback for an attached garage in conjunction with a single family residence on
2.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located
on the west side of
6. DR-0608-12 –
APPROVED per staff conditions
ADD Public Works conditions:
·
Design review as a
public hearing for lighting and signage
·
Record
perpetual cross access, ingress/egress, only if the uses are compatible with
property to the east,
DELTE Public Works Development review Bullets # 1 &
2
DESIGN REVIEW for a shopping center on 4.0 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the east side of
The plans show a revised site design for a previously
approved shopping center consisting of 6 buildings. The one TAB objective is to
provide for cross access when compatible businesses are on adjacent properties. This was not shown on the plot plan
presented. As a result the TAB added a
condition to provide for cross access for businesses located along
Lighting and signage were not part of this
application. The TAB added the
recommendation for a public review of these items.
The grading has been done on this property. The drainage study has been accomplished and
is not required to be repeated. The same
applies for the traffic study. The TAB
recommended both conditions be eliminated.
7. DR-0621-12 –
APPROVED per staff conditions
DESIGN REVIEW for a public park and all associated uses including, but
not limited to, soccer fields, basketball courts, restroom, shade structures,
and playground equipment on a 10.0 acre portion of an 80.3 acre site in a P-F
(Public Facility) Zone. Generally located the south side of
8. DR-0623-12 – B T
APPROVED per staff conditions
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following:
1) A fast food restaurant;
2) Lighting plan; and
3)
Comprehensive sign
plan
on 0.6 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
9. VC-1282-04 (ET-0106-12)
– ADAVEN MANAGEMENT, INC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
HOLDOVER
VARIANCES THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME to commence the following:
1) Reduced lot depth; and
2) Reduced lot size on 5.0 acres
in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in
the
10. TA-0603-12 – GATSKI COMMERCIAL
DENIED
TEXT AMENDMENT to amend Chapter 30.72, Table 30.72-1 to allow wall signs to
exceed 50 square feet per elevation with the submission of a master sign
package. (For possible action)
The TAB was against this text amendment for
the following:
·
The
office professional zone district is normally comprised of destination
businesses.
·
The
office professional zone district is used a buffer next to residential.
·
The
size of sign in a master sign package would not be limited.
·
50
sq. ft. sign is large enough for office type uses.
·
The
county wide code should not be changed to accommodate one project.
·
It
is not clear that the master sign package would be subject to a public Design
Review.
·
If
all master sign packages were subject to a public design review, it would be an
undue burden on applicants who would be administratively approved.
·
Some
signs are intrusive on residential neighborhoods; The TAB has received
complaints about the sign effects of on residential neighborhoods.
11. ZC-0585-12 –
Per
staff condition with the following changes
ADD Current Planning Conditions:
·
Design
review as a public hearing for significant changes to plans
·
Design
review as a public hearing for lighting and signage.
CHANGE Public Works bullet #3 to read:
·
Full
off-site improvements along
ADD Public Works conditions:
·
Pebble
Road, east of Durango Drive, will be constructed to non-urban standards and
have a reduced number of travel lanes at the intersection in order to
transition into the existing RNP area and be similar conceptually to exhibit
shown as part of NZC-0316-12, dated September 5, 2012
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce the street off-set between intersections.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
shopping center. Generally located on the east side of
The applicant has agreed to the TAB conditions.
This zone change is appropriate of the
location. The designs presented were
preliminary in nature with more detailed design to follow. Also, no lighting or signage details were
presented. As a result the TAB
recommended public design reviews for those items.
One concern is the design of
12. ZC-0614-12 – DALE, DANIEL:
HELD by the applicant to
The statements, opinions and observations expressed
in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
author’s content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments author’s affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly
identified. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.