ENTERPRISE TAB WATCH

Results

February 27, 2013

 

The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the following dates:

 

Planning Commission 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, March 19, 2013.

Board of County Commissioners 9:00 A.M., Wednesday, March 20, 2013.

 

HOLDOVER/RETURNED APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.

 

The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the BCC within five business days of the date of the PC hearing.  Appeal form is found at:

 

 Clark County Appeal Form

 

An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271).  Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.  Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN).  You can contact SWAN at:

 

702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email:   swan@lvswan.org

 

Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.

 

REGULAR BUSINESS

 

1.  Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on February 13, 2013.  APPROVED as published

 

2.  Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes.  APPROVED with following changes:

 

Held by the applicant until March 13, 2013

8.         VS-0046-13 - PARDEE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC; ET AL:

14.       WS-0045-13 – PARDEE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC; ET AL:

 

Companion items that will be heard together:

 


2.     TM-0015-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:                   10.       VS-0062-13 – HLI, LLC ET AL:

5.     VS-0058-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:                   16.       WS-0061-13 – HLI, LLC ET AL:

7.     WS-0057-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:

9.     VS-0060-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:                   11.       VS-0064-13 – HLI, LLC:

15.   WS-0059-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:                 17.       WS-0063-13 – HLI, LLC

 

12.   VS-0066-13 – TOWN AND COUNTRY BANK, INC

19.   ZC-0065-13–TOWN & COUNTRY BANK

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS:  NONE

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS:   NONE

 

ZONING AGENDA:

 

03/19/13 PC

 

1.         UC-0597-10 (ET-0012-13) – JAHA TRUST:

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

USE PERMIT FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence an accessory structure (garage) which exceeds one-half the footprint of the principal building.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for an accessory structure (garage) in conjunction with a single family residence on 1.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.  Generally located on the east side of Tomsik Street, 300 feet north of Camero Avenue within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/mc/ml  (For possible action)

 

2.         TM-0015-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:   Companion items 5 & 7

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

TENTATIVE MAP consisting of 32 single family residential lots on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.  Generally located on the northeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Richmar Avenue within Enterprise.  SB/rk/ml  (For possible action)

 

3.         UC-0052-13 – SILVERADO MINI-STORAGE, LLC:

            DENIED

USE PERMIT to allow vehicle rental (U-Haul trucks and trailers) in conjunction with an existing mini-warehouse facility.

 

WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to allow outside storage/display of rental commercial vehicles (U-Haul trucks and trailers) visible from public streets and residential developments on 5.6 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District.  Generally located on the east side of Pollock Drive, 890 feet south of Silverado Ranch Boulevard within Enterprise.  ss/pb/ml  (For possible action)

 

The requested vehicle rental (truck and trailer) use in a C-1 zone requires approval of a use permit which is subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission and shall not be approved unless it is established that the use is appropriate at the proposed location.

 

The TAB determined the use is not appropriate for the following:

·         This storage facility is surrounded by residential.

·         No landscape buffer between truck parking and the residential.

·         Application does not meet the code requirement,  to be permitted only if not visible from public streets or residential development.

·         U-Haul trucks would be visible to adjacent residents when parked in the storage location.

·         Display of commercial trucks along Pollock Drive is not appropriate in a residential neighborhood.

·         After hours truck returns will leave truck outside the gate and visible from Pollack street.

·         Engine noise and back-up alarms would affect adjacent residents.

 

4.         VS-0053-13 – UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY:

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Jones Boulevard and El Camino Road (alignment), and between Serene Avenue (alignment) and Blue Diamond Road in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone, a H-2 (General Highway Frontage) Zone, and an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/co/ed  (For possible action)

 

5.         VS-0058-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:  Companion items 2 & 7

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Jones Boulevard and Shade Mountain Street (alignment) and between Richmar Avenue and Meranto Avenue in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/rk/ed  (For possible action)

 

6.         WS-0039-13 – MARCETTA-WLODEK LIVING TRUST:

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Reduced front setback; and

2) Reduced setback from the right-of-way

 

for an addition to an existing single family dwelling in conjunction with a planned unit development on 0.4 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.  Generally located on the east side of Valerie Elaine Street, 40 feet north of Brittany Nicole Court within Enterprise.  sb/pb/ml  (For possible action)

 

7.         WS-0057-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:   Companion items 2 & 5

Approved per staff conditions with the following:

Wavier of Development Standards #3 applies to cul-de-sac lots 15-18 on the tentative map

DENY Waiver of Development Standards #5;

CHANGE Current Planning condition bullets 1 and 2 to read:

•       Front and rear elevations, facing public streets, shall include architectural enhancements around windows and door openings to match the front elevations.

•       Provide pedestrian access on the end of the cul-de-sac for additional connectivity to the adjacent property, designated as a school site, if approved by the Clark County School District (CCSD).

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 

 

1) Increased wall height;

2) Increased building height;

3) Reduced rear yard setback;

4) Increase the length of a cul-de-sac; and

5) Modified street improvement standards.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.   Generally located on the northeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Richmar Avenue within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/rk/ml  (For possible action)

 

Residents, east of the project, strongly opposed the application.  Their concerns were:

·         The proposed density is too high when compared with their neighborhood (1/4 to1/3 acre lots)

·         Increased traffic in the area

·         Decreasing their property value

·         Three story, 38 foot high residences, are not appropriate in their area. Residences to the east are all single story.  One of six models offered is three stories.

·         Concern that the CCSD land reservation adjacent to their property could become some other land use, further degrading their neighborhood.

 

The TAB recommendations are based upon the following:

·         The project density is appropriate for the area.  The area development shows an orderly transition from RNP to low density to medium density housing.

·         The increased height is within the 10% that could be approved administratively

·         The reduced rear yard setback should be restricted to houses on the cul-de-sac bulb only.  Not a blanket waiver for the entire project.

·         The increased wall height is below 8 ft.

·         The non-standard road improvements have been routinely granted for projects in the area.

 

The pedestrian access may not be desired by CCSD due to security concerns.  The TAB recommends the CCSD approval be required to implement the pedestrian access.

 

The TAB has consistently recommended the Waiver of Development Standard # 5, back of curb return, not be waived as a safety factor.

 

Title 30 has recently changed to require fenestrations (the arrangement, proportioning, and design of windows and doors in a building) on all sides of a house.  This application was processed prior to the Title 30 change, as a result the staff added requirements for fenestrations on all elevations.  The TAB has advocated for elevations facing a road or public facility have fenestrations instead of a flat building side.  One question, not resolved, is the side wall fenestrations requirement between two tightly spaced buildings.  Does it make sense to expend money where the fenestration is not easily seen?

 

03/20/13 BCC

 

8.         VS-0046-13 – PARDEE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC; ET AL:  Companion item 14

HELD by the applicant to March 13, 2013 TAB meeting

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Pebble Road and Torino Avenue and between Tomsik Street and Gagnier Boulevard in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/rk/ed  (For possible action)

 

9.         VS-0060-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:      Companion item 15

 APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Meranto Avenue and Richmar Avenue, and between Jones Boulevard and Westwind Road in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/gc/xx  (For possible action)

 

10.       VS-0062-13 – HLI, LLC ET AL: Companion item 10

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Lindell Road and Lions Peak Court (alignment), and between Silverado Ranch Boulevard and Ledgewood Creek Avenue in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/al/xx  (For possible action)

 

11.       VS-0064-13 – HLI, LLC:  Companion item 17

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Silverado Ranch Boulevard and Gary Avenue (alignment), and between Lindell Road and Mohawk Street (alignment) in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/al/xx  (For possible action)

 

12.       VS-0066-13 – TOWN AND COUNTRY BANK, INC:  Companion item 19

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

VACATE AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark County located between Pebble Road and Blue Diamond Road and between Grand Canyon Drive and Park Street in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/mk/xx (For possible action)

 

13.       WS-0042-13 – VAG HOLDINGS II, LLC:

APPROVED per staff if approved conditions

ADD Public Works Development Review condition:

·         Install pedestrian operated protected cross walk on Maule Avenue.

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Requirement for parking areas to be designed in a series of smaller, connected parking courts; and

2) Required trash enclosure.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a parking lot on 5.0 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the MUD-3 and CMA Design Overlay Districts.  Generally located on the south side of Maule Avenue, 330 feet east of Redwood Street within Enterprise.  ss/pb/ml  (For possible action)

 

The staff recommended this application be denied due to not meeting the CMA standards.  The CMA standards would require the parking area have four parking courts and trash containers. The plan presented a well laid out parking area with landscaping with three parking courts.  The TAB opinion is the parking court design presented will be a positive for the area.  The design includes two trash cans located near the entrance on Maule Avenue and no large trash bin or enclosure is provided.  The trash cans will be emptied into trash bins on the north side of Maule.  This arrangement should provide sufficient trash collection for the parking lot.  If the use changes, a trash bin may be required.  However, the design, as presented, does not meet the CMA standard for a trash bin.

 

Parking will be provided for 457 vehicles. The TAB is concerned about the lack of a pedestrian crossing between the parking area and the work area across Maule Street.  This is a safety item.  The TAB recommended a protected pedestrian crosswalk be established.

 

14.       WS-0045-13 – PARDEE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC; ET AL:  Companion item 8

HELD by the applicant to March 13, 2013 TAB meeting

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Reduced lot area;

2) Full off-site improvements; and

3) modified street improvement standards

 

in conjunction with a proposed single family residential development on 7.7 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.  Generally located on the north side Pebble Road and the west side of Tomsik Street within Enterprise.  SB/rk/ml  (For possible action)

 

15.       WS-0059-13 – CFT LANDS, LLC:  Companion item 9

APPROVED per staff conditions with the following:

CHANGE Current Planning condition bullets 1 and 2 to read:

·         Front and rear elevations shall include architectural enhancements around windows and door openings to match the front elevations.

·         Provide pedestrian access on the end of the cul-de-sac for additional connectivity to the adjacent property designated as a school site, if approved by the Clark County School District.

DENY Waiver of Development Standards # 3b

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Increase wall height;

2) Increase building height; and

3) Modified street improvement standards.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development on 2.5 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.  Generally located on the north side of Richmar Avenue, 700 feet east of Jones Boulevard within Enterprise.  SB/gc/ml  (For possible action)

 

Residents, east of the project, strongly opposed the application.  Their concerns are:

·         The proposed density is too high when compared with their neighborhood (1/4 to1/3 acre lots)

·         Increased traffic in the area

·         Decreasing their property value

·         Three story, 38 foot high residences are not appropriate in their area. Residences to the east are all single story.

·         Concern that the CCSD land reservation adjacent to their property could become some other land use, further degrading their neighborhood.

 

The TAB recommendations are based upon the following:

·         The project density is appropriate for the area.  The area development shows an orderly transition from RNP to low density to medium density housing.

·         The increased height is within the 10% that could be approved administratively.

·         The increased wall height is below 8 ft.

·         The non-standard road improvements have been routinely granted for projects in the area.

 

The pedestrian access may not be desired by CCSD due to security concerns.  The TAB recommends the CCSD approval be required to implement the pedestrian access.

 

Title 30 has recently changed to require fenestrations (the arrangement, proportioning, and design of windows and doors in a building) on all sides of a house.  This application was processed prior to the Title 30 change, as a result, the staff added requirements for fenestrations on all elevations.  The TAB has advocated for elevations facing a road or public facility have fenestrations instead of a flat building side.  One question, not resolved, is the side wall fenestrations requirement between two tightly spaced buildings.  Does it make sense to expend money where the fenestration is not easily seen?

 

16.       WS-0061-13 – HLI, LLC ET AL:  Companion item 10

Approved per staff conditions with the following:

Wavier of Development Standards #3 applies to lots located on the cul-de-sac bulb

CHANGE Current Planning condition bullet # 1 to read:

•                      Provide enhanced fenestration on elevations that face public rights-of-ways or public facilities.

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Increased wall height;

2) Increased building height;

3) Reduced setbacks; and

4) Reduced intersection off-set

 

in conjunction with a single family residential development on 5.1 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.

 

WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a zone change (ZC-1450-04) requiring provide a 15 foot wide landscape buffer with detached sidewalks along Lindell Road with 2 rows of medium trees, 24 inch box in size, with shrubs to cover 50% of the landscape areas.  Generally located on the southwest corner of Silverado Ranch Boulevard and Lindell Road within Enterprise.  SB/al/ml  (For possible action)

 

The TAB recommendations are based upon the following:

·         The project density is appropriate for the area.  The area development shows an orderly transition from RNP to low density to medium density housing.

·         The increased height is within the 10% that could be approved administratively

·         The increased wall height is below 8 ft.

·         The non-standard road improvements have been routinely granted for projects in the area.

 

The Waiver of Conditions maintains a consistent design for sidewalk and landscaping along Lindell Road.  Properties north and south have installed sidewalk and landscaping similar to that requested by the applicant.

 

The reduced rear yard setback should be restricted to houses that are on the cul-de-sac bulb only.  Not a blanket waiver for the entire project.

 

Title 30 has recently changed to require fenestrations (the arrangement, proportioning, and design of windows and doors in a building) on all sides of a house.  This application was processed prior to the Title 30 change; as a result, the staff added requirements for fenestrations on all elevations.  The TAB has advocated for elevations facing a road or public facility have fenestrations instead of a flat building side.  One question, not resolved, is the side wall fenestrations requirement between two tightly spaced buildings.  Does it make sense to expend money where the fenestration is not easily seen?

 

TAB approved Waiver of Development Standards #4 because the reduced distance between intersections is being proposed at a 60 foot roadway and residential streets with minimum traffic flows.  The drop off and pick up traffic around the abutting elementary school may pose a problem.

 

17.       WS-0063-13 – HLI, LLC:  Companion item 11

APPROVED per staff conditions with the following:

CHANGE Current Planning condition bullets 2 and 3 to read:

·         Provide enhanced fenestration on elevations that face public roads and public facilities.

·         Provide pedestrian access on the north end of the subdivision for additional connectivity to the adjacent property designated as a school site, if approved by the Clark County School District.

DENY Waiver of Development Standards # 3b

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Increased wall height;

2) Increased building height; and

3) Allow alternative off-site improvements

 

in conjunction with a single family residential development.

 

WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a zone change (ZC-1599-06) requiring right-of-way dedication to include 30 feet for Mohawk Street.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a detached single family residential development on 2.5 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone.  Generally located on the north side of Silverado Ranch Boulevard, 330 feet east of Lindell Road within Enterprise.  SB/al/ml  (For possible action)

 

The TAB recommendations are based upon the following:

·         The project density is appropriate for the area.  The area development and planned land use shows an orderly transition from RNP to low density to medium density housing.

·         The increased height is within the 10% that could be approved administratively.

·         The increased wall height is below 8 ft.

·         The non-standard road improvements have been routinely granted for projects in the area.

 

Title 30 has recently changed to require fenestrations (the arrangement, proportioning, and design of windows and doors in a building) on all sides of a house.  This application was processed prior to the Title 30 change; as a result, the staff added requirements for fenestrations on all elevations.  The TAB has advocated for elevations facing a road or public facility have fenestrations instead of a flat building side.  One question, not resolved, is the side wall fenestrations requirement between two tightly spaced buildings.  Does it make sense to expend money where the fenestration is not easily seen?

 

The TAB has consistently recommended the Waiver of Development Standard # 3b, back of curb return, not be waived as a safety factor.

 

The pedestrian access may not be desired by CCSD due to security concerns.  The TAB recommends the CCSD approval be required to implement the pedestrian access.

 

Two positions were presented on the requirement to dedicate Mohawk Street right-of-way.  The area residents do not want Mohawk to connect to Silverado Ranch Boulevard.

 

IN FAVOR:

·         Do not dedicate Mohawk to eliminate a possible cut-through route in the RNP to the north.

·         Mohawk probably will not be included in the future development of the BLM land north of this development.

·         The Mohawk Street alignment does not exist in the development just south of this development

·         The distance between Mohawk and other intersections is too close for safety.

 

OPPOSED:

·         The adjacent property to the north is designated as a future elementary school site in the Enterprise Land Use Plan.

·         The traffic flow around elementary schools is a problem.

·         The removal of Mohawk alignment would eliminate one of two of the possible access points from an arterial.

·         The lack of sufficient access points to an arterial would constrain future project, road and access design.

·         One arterial access point (Edmond) may increase the cut-through traffic in the RNP to the north as the school is built.

·         The area is not sufficiently developed to determine what local roads will be needed for traffic flow.

The TAB recommends the Waiver of Conditions be approved.

 

18.       ZC-0043-13 – BGD, LLC:

APPROVED per staff conditions

 

ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 5.0 acres from M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone and M-D (Designed Manufacturing) (AE-65) Zone to C-2 (General Commercial) Zone and C-2 (General Commercial) (AE-65) Zone.

 

USE PERMIT for vehicle repair in conjunction with a proposed vehicle/automobile sales facility.

 

WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to waive the requirement for parking areas to be designed in a series of smaller connected parking courts.

 

DESIGN REVIEW for a vehicle/automobile sales and repair facility in the MUD-3 and CMA Design Overlay Districts.  Generally located on the north side of Maule Avenue and the east side of Redwood Street within Enterprise (description on file).  SS/PB/ML  (For possible action)

 

The application replaces under-developed land with a Porsche car dealership.  The TAB found the plan is consistent with other developments in the area and the CMA standards.  The only question is the lack of parking courts when parking places exceed 100 places.  The parking area is within a secure parking location for vehicles being serviced.  This area is surrounded by a wall and not is accessible to the public.

 

19.       ZC-0065-13 –TOWN & COUNTRY BANK:   Companion item 12

Initial motion on the application was approved 5-0:

APPROVED waiver of development standards #s 3a & 3b

DENIED waiver of development standards #s 1a, 1b, 2 & 4

CHANGE public works development review condition #1 to read:

•          Waive full offsites on Park Street, except for 32 feet paving, if allowed by drainage study

ADD public works development review condition

•          Street lighting along Grand Canyon Drive at intersections only and to be fully shielded.

 

The zone change was omitted from the initial vote:

APPROVED 5-0 Motion to reconsider

 

Second motion on the application was approved 5-0

APPROVED zone change

APPROVED waiver of development standards #s 3a & 3b

DENIED waiver of development standards #s 1a, 1b, 2 & 4

CHANGE Public Works Development Review condition #1 to read:

•          Waive full offsites on Park Street, except for 32 feet paving, if allowed by drainage study

ADD Public Works Development Review condition

•          Street lighting along Grand Canyon Drive at intersections only and to be full shielded.

 

ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 2.5 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone.

 

WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:

 

1) Reduced lot sizes;

2) Reduced setbacks;

3) Modified street improvement standards; and

4) Full off-site improvements

 

in conjunction with a proposed single family subdivision on 7.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone and an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone.  Generally located on the east side of Grand Canyon Drive, 350 feet south of Pebble Road within Enterprise (description on file).  SB/mk/ml (For possible action)

 

This application was strongly opposed by current RNP residents because of lot size both within and bordering the RNP.  Their opinion is lots should all meet or exceed the Title 30 standards.  The lot standard in Title 30 is comprised of two parts.  First, is the number of units per acre.  Second, is the minimum square footage.  In an RNP-1 overlay, the standard is a 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size and not more than 2 units per acre.  The RD zone district standard is more than 10,000 sq. ft. and no more than 3 units per acre.

 

Over the last several years, the unit per acre standard has been adhered to while the square footage standard has drifted toward 18,000 sq. ft. in the RNP.  The developers have pushed the minimum lot size toward 18,000 sq. ft. and in some cases below 18,000 sq. ft. This lot size reduction under the minimum is not a good trend.  At what point does the trend stop? If both standards cannot be met the project should not be approved.  This project met one, but not both standards.

 

The RNP is the most fragile land use within the county. Once it is gone or not developed to standards, it cannot be reclaimed.  The TAB is concerned with two areas, first is the drift toward smaller lot sizes.  Second is adequate buffer be maintained around the RNP area. The Enterprise Land Use Policy is lots abutting the RNP should be at least 10,000 sq. ft.  The developers within and bordering the RNP must plan their projects to meet or exceed the minimum standards. This project as presented continues to degrade of RNP standards. 

 

The TAB opinion is the trend toward lot sizes less than the minimum needs to be stopped.  A lot size smaller than the minimum (20,000 sq. ft.) should be the exception, not the standard. 

 

The TAB did recommend approval for several parts of the application.  The zone change is conforming and appropriate for the area.  The requested street modifications standards have been approved in numerous other projects.  The lighting condition was added to help lighting standard consistence with the lighting within the RNP and reduce light pollution.

 

ADDITIONAL BUSINESS  NONE

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

The TAB will begin discussions concerning the Enterprise 2014 Major Land Use update.  The discussions will include land use category descriptions, goals and policies, administrative procedures and descriptive land use.  The public is encouraged to submit ideas and suggestions for this discussion.  The TAB will not take action on the any item discussed until it has been placed on the agenda for action.

 

NEXT MEETING DATE:  March 13, 2013, 6:00 pm

ADJOURNMENT: 

 

The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this document are solely those of the author.  The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of any government board, organization or group.  The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not altered.  Additional comments maybe added.  Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the document.  The additional comments author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be clearly identified.  This attribution statement must accompany any distribution of this document.

David D. Chestnut, Sr.