Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes.
APPROVED with the following changes:
The
following zoning items are companion items and will be heard together:
3 VC-0159-13 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC
4 VC-0161-13 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC
7 UC-0169-13 – BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
9 VS-0164-13 – Branch Banking & Trust company
8 VS-0152-13 - 2010-1 Radc/cadc property vi, llc
10 ZC-0151-13 – 2010-1 Radc/cadc property vi, llc
ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE
ZONING
AGENDA:
1. UC-0148-13 – TZORTZIS, VASSILIOS &
MARIA:
APPROVED per staff conditions
USE PERMITS for the following:
1) A communication tower; and
2) Reduce the separation between communication towers to 540
feet where 600 feet is required (a 10%
reduction).
DESIGN REVIEW for a communication tower in conjunction with a restaurant
(tavern) on a portion of 3.7 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the
MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located on the west side of
The land owner of the cell tower to the north was not in
favor of the reduced separation between towers.
She felt the applicant’s tower would devalue the lease for the tower on
her land. The TAB did not agree with her
position.
2. UC-0158-13 –
APPROVED per staff conditions
USE PERMIT for a child care facility.
DESIGN REVIEW for a children’s playground facility and shed structure in
conjunction with an existing place of worship on 9.3 acres in a P-F (Public
Facility) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
3. VC-0159-13 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions with the following change:
CHANGE Major Projects – Planning “if approved” condition number 2 to read:
· All lots to have 1 tree and shrubs
planted adjacent to the street front.
ADD Major Projects “if approved” condition:
·
Front yard setback
limited to 8ft width for one house model
VARIANCES for the following:
1) Increased building height;
2) Reduced front yard setback; and
3) Reduced rear yard setback
in conjunction with single family residential development
on 29.8 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks
Concept Plan Area. Generally located on the south side of
This application was processed under Title 29 when the
Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan was approved.
Under the current Title 30 the variances #s 2 & 3 would not be
required. The reduced front yard setback
is only required for one of five models and for an eight foot width. Variance #
1 has been routinely approved for projects in
The applicant request to have the staff condition for two
trees in the front yard be modified to one tree and shrubs. The lots are 33 ft. wide and two large trees
would be too crowded.
The project provides 20 ft. driveway for all houses.
4. VC-0161-13 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions with the following change:
CHANGE Current Planning “if approved” condition number 2 to read:
· All lots to have 1 tree and shrubs
planted adjacent to the street front.
ADD Major Projects “if approved” condition:
·
·
Front yard setback
limited to 8ft width for one house model
VARIANCES for the following:
1) Increased building height;
2) Reduced front yard setback; and
3) Reduced rear yard setback
in conjunction with single family residential development
on 21.9 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks
Concept Plan Area. Generally located on the southwest corner of
An adjacent neighbor was concerned with the building mass
and height in their backyard. Their
backyard will face the side of the building to the north. The TAB added a condition to require lot 166
be a two story building to help limit the building mass in their back
yard.
This application was processed under Title 29 when the
Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan was approved.
Under the current Title 30 the variances #s 2 & 3 would not be
required. The reduced front yard setback
is only required for one of five models and for an eight foot width. Variance #
1 has been routinely approved for projects in
The applicant request to have the staff condition for two
trees in the front yard be modified to one tree and shrubs. The lots are 33 ft. wide and two large trees
would be too crowded.
The project provides 20 ft. driveway for all houses.
5. WS-0172-13 – USCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) Allow modified street improvement standards; and
2) Reduced street off-set
in conjunction with a proposed single family development on
2.1 acres in an RUD (Residential Urban Density) Zone. Generally
located on the west side of Jones Boulevard, 930 feet north of Windmill Lane within
The TAB has requested Public Works look at the edge of
driveway to back of curb radius standard.
This standard has been routinely waived for private streets. Does the standard need to be change for
private streets?
APPROVE Design Review
DENY Waiver of Conditions
Motion APPROVED with
staff “if approved” conditions
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
restaurant with outside dining in conjunction with an existing shopping center
on 2.1 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone.
WAIVER OF
CONDITIONS of a zone change (NZC-1485-04)
requiring recording perpetual cross access, ingress/egress, and parking
easement. Generally located on the west side of
The TAB opinion is the cross access requirement removal
will not improve the situation. Cross
access between the two commercial properties has been an ongoing problem. The requirement for cross access was left off
the north property land use application.
Both property owners point to each other as not being
cooperative. The solutions presented
shift the cost to the other side. One
TAB suggestion is this applicant construct a drive aisle that removes half the
elevation required to complete the cross access.
Cross access would benefit both commercial sites.
7. UC-0169-13 – BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
COMPANY:
APPROVED per staff conditions
USE PERMIT to allow an accessory use (swimming pool) prior to a
principal use.
WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) Reduce the front setback; and
2) Reduce the setback from a street
for an approved apartment complex on 4.7 acres in an R-3
(Multiple Family Residential) Zone.
Generally located on the
south side of
8. VS-0152-13 - 2010-1 RADC/CADC PROPERTY VI,
LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
9. VS-0164-13 – BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
COMPANY:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
10. ZC-0151-13 – 2010-1 RADC/CADC PROPERTY VI,
LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
This is an excellent use for this area. The TAB has consistently recommended the
density be less than RUD. The slightly
less than 6 unit/acre follows that recommendation. The lower density has less impact on overcrowded
southwestern schools and decreases traffic volume in the area.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
The TAB will discuss items concerning the
Enterprise 2014 Major Land Use update.
The discussions will include land use category descriptions, goals and
policies, administrative procedures and descriptive land use. The public is encouraged to submit ideas and
suggestions for this discussion. The TAB
will not take action on the any item discussed until it has been placed on the
agenda for action.
The TAB will make
recommendations for the
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
· The Department of Energy has added code provisions to national
building standards requiring the placement of large tree on the south east
property corner to block sunlight. This
code will take 4 to 8 years to filter down to the local level. In addition, houses will have to meet energys
standards to have a building permit issued.
· Query Public Works on traffic signals at Warm Springs and
ADJOURNMENT:
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
author’s content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments author’s affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly
identified. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.