Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the BCC within five business days of the date of the PC hearing. Appeal form is found at:
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
PRESENTATION
Ed Morano from the Nevada Department of
Transportation briefed the board and residents about the project.
• Cactus
interchange will be six lanes in a design similar to Silverado interchange.
• The
project will extend from
• Signals
will be installed at Las Vegas Blvd/Cactus and Cactus/Dean Martin.
• Working
with
• Working
with
• A
flood channel will be constructed as part of the project.
• The
landscaping and architectural enhancements were decided with community
involvement.
• Traffic
congestion at Dean Martin and
• The
estimated completion date is October 2014.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Town Hall Meeting
Please join Commissioner
Susan Brager for a Town Hal Meeting at
Neighborhood Meetings:
NZC-0020-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
Freeman Corporate Office
6555 W Sunset
(Main entrance is
facing east near the flag pole)
To discuss a nonconforming zone change from
C-2 and R-E to M-1to allow for a freight terminal, associated office use and
truck scales.
Master plan designation:
Assessor parcel numbers: 176-02-501-002, 009, 010, 011 and 012
NZC-0021-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
A non-conforming zone change from R-E to R-1
and R-2 for a 23 unit single family residential development and R-E to R-2 to
allow for a 56 unit single family residential development.
Master plan designation: Residential Low and
Residential Suburban
Assessor parcel numbers: 177-29-301-030 Dean Martin and Pyle
NZC-0022-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
A non-conforming zone change from C-1, H-2 and
R-E to R-2 for a 180 unit single family development.
Master plan designation: Residential Low,
Commercial Neighborhood and Commercial General
Assessor parcel numbers: 176-19-101-007, 009, 010 and 022
NZC-0024-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
Windmill Library. 7060
A non-conforming zone change from R-E to R-2
for a proposed 30 lot single family residential project.
Master plan designation: Commercial
Neighborhood
Assessor parcel numbers: 176-10-201-013
NZC-0025-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
Windmill Library. 7060
A nonconforming zone change from C-2 to R-2
for a proposed 52 lot single family residential project. SE corner of
Master plan designation: Commercial General
Assessor parcel numbers: 176-21-201-001
NZC-0026-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
Windmill Library. 7060
A nonconforming zone change from H-2 to R-D
for a proposed single family residential project
Master plan designation: Commercial General
Assessor parcel numbers:
NZC-0027-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
An informal meeting to obtain neighborhood
input regarding a non-conforming zone change for our proposed Trail Creek
(Agate and
Master plan designation: Commercial General
Assessor parcel numbers: 176-20-501-016, 017 Agate and
NZC-0028-13
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING
NON-CONFORMING ZONE
BOUNDARY AMENDMENT
You are invited to attend a neighborhood
meeting to discuss the proposed development of the +/-
Assessor's Parcel No: 191-04-101-001
ZONING
AGENDA:
1.
TM-0055-13 – GREAT
WESTERN BANK:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
MAP
consisting of 17 single family residential lots on 10.1 acres in an R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) Zone and an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I)
Zone. Generally located on the south side of
The neighborhood meeting was well attended and
questions on this application were answered.
This resulted in no opposition to this item at the TAB meeting. The developer stated that there would not be
a HOA for this development. A TAB
concern was the prohibition of large animals where allowed by the code. The TAB made two suggestions to the
developer.
·
The developer has a stable option available. This should be included as an option for
these properties.
·
The homes along
2. UC-0203-13 – IMCC
APPROVED per staff conditions with the following
changes:
STRIKE Uses numbered 4) caterer; 5) day care; 8)
funeral home; 9) grocery store; 23) minor training facility.
ADD condition:
· Public Hearing for any use that requires separation from a residential
use.
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1) On-premise consumption of alcohol (service
bar);
2) Art gallery/studio;
3) Antiques;
4) Caterer;
5) Day care;
6) Financial services;
7) Food processing;
8) Funeral home;
9) Grocery store;
10) Jewelry sales;
11) Laundromat;
12) Laundry service;
13) Office;
14) Permanent makeup;
15) Personal services;
16) Pet shop;
17) Pharmacy;
18) Postal service;
19) Restaurant;
20) Retail sales;
21) Shoe repair;
22) Sporting goods; and
23) Minor training facility
in conjunction with an existing commercial
development on 2.7 acres in an H-2 (General Highway Frontage) Zone in the MUD-4
Overlay District. Generally located on the southwest corner of
There is strong neighborhood interest in this
application. The neighborhood concerns
are:
·
Uses not compatible with the neighborhood.
·
Does
·
·
Some list uses may require more parking than available.
·
Given the property history, the neighborhood felt they should be
consulted prior to the TAB meeting.
The applicant views this application as a
bridge from H-2 to C-1 zoning and uses on this property. A non-conforming zone change application has
been submitted.
The TAB questioned the idea of blanket use
permit approvals. This does not allow
the TAB or the Commissioners to review a use to determine how it blends into
the neighborhood. Several of the uses
requested correspond to uses by current tenants and should be granted.
The TAB recommended the uses that could
produce a heavy impact on parking not be granted at this time and there should
be a public hearing. The TAB also
recommended that any use, with a separation requirement from residential,
require a public hearing for the use.
It was suggested the applicant hold a
neighborhood meeting prior to the Planning Commission meeting to discuss the
shopping center and the effect on the neighborhood.
3. UC-0221-13 – JUREWICZ,
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Current Planning condition #1 to read:
· 1 year to commence and review as a public hearing.
USE
PERMIT to
increase the number of large agricultural animals (horses) in conjunction with
an existing single family dwelling on 1.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the west side of
The application drew some opposition from
neighboring residents. The objection was
the dust and flies generated by this location create a health hazard that could
not be challenged scientifically.
The TAB considered the following:
·
There were 6 CCPRO actions
o
5 found no violation
o
1 found 9 horses where four are allowed
o
No commercial activity was found
·
The applicant has reduced the number of horses to 4.
·
The arena area is watered daily.
·
Sand has been brought in to help control dust.
·
The applicant volunteers time and horses for autistic youth
activities.
·
The horses on the property are rescue animals.
·
The request for 12 horses was arrived at with help of the staff.
·
Previously, 20 horses were approved on the property.
·
The description of daily cleanup indicated a well-cared for
property
·
There are other horse properties in the area that do not have the
same upkeep level.
The opinion is the applicant is making a good
effort to prevent flies and dust. A one
year review is appropriate to ensure the applicant has made the changes for
better dust control.
Another significant factor is the applicant’s
willingness to take in rescue horses.
There is a shortage in
4. UC-0222-13 –
APPROVED
per staff conditions
USE
PERMIT for a
communication tower
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
communication tower in conjunction with an approved data center on 17.8 acres
in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone in the CMA Design Overlay District. Generally located on the north side of
5. UC-0224-13 – WJC, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Current Planning condition #1 to read:
· 8 months to commence and review as a public hearing.
USE
PERMIT for a
food cart (shaved ice) not located within an enclosed building.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
food cart (shaved ice) in conjunction with an existing convenience store and
gasoline station on 1.8 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on the northwest corner of
The eight month review allows the summer to
determine the appropriateness of the site and to process the review before the
next season for the shaved ice cart.
6. VS-0216-13 – GREAT WESTERN BANK:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to Clark County
located
between Windmill Lane and Shelbourne Avenue, and between Haven Street and
Gilespie Street (alignment) in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and an R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone within Enterprise (description on file). SS/gc/ml
(For possible action)
7. UC-0190-13 – SILVERADO JONES, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning conditions:
·
Design Review as a public hearing for lighting and signage;
·
Rear doors on the inline building to be emergency exits only;
·
Record perpetual cross access, ingress and egress, and parking
easements;
·
Architectural enhancements on the east and north sides of the inline
building;
·
Car wash operation restricted to County "day light" hours
only.
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1) Vehicle maintenance; and
2) A vehicle (car) wash within a portion of a
proposed shopping center on 2.5 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce the setback from a vehicle (car) wash to
a residential use; and
2) Permit a service bay to face a street.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
shopping center including a tavern, convenience store with vehicle (car) wash,
gasoline station, and vehicle maintenance business on 3.8 acres in a C-1 (Local
Business) Zone and a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the northeast corner of
Three of the five added conditions were
attached to a previous application. The
recommendation to add architectural enhancements to the east and
north side of the in-line building was added due to close proximity of residences. There was a discussion on the location of the
car wash and the effects on the adjacent residential. The recommendation is to limit the car wash operation
hours to County “day light” hours.
8. VS-0233-13 – NV NAP9, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
AND ABANDON
easements of interest to Clark County located between Warm Springs Road and Eldorado Lane and between
Jones Boulevard and Lindell Road, and portions
of a right-of-way being Warm Springs Road located between Jones Boulevard and
Lindell Road,
and portions of
rights-of-way being Jones Boulevard and Lindell Road located between Warm
Springs Road and Eldorado Lane in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone within Enterprise (description on file). SS/pb/ml
(For possible action)
9. ZC-0205-13
– TOLL
APPROVE Zone Change to R-1
APPROVE Waivers of Development Standards
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Design Review as a public hearing for
residential products as a condition of a zone change.
Per staff conditions
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 8.5 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone for a single
family residential subdivision in the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1)
Allow modified street
improvement standards; and
2) Reduced street off-set.
Generally located 630 feet north of
This application was strongly opposed by a
number of residents. Their concerns were:
·
Toll Brothers has not maintained a consistent product for the
neighborhood.
o
Ally loaded product with estate lot product.
o
The product changed to an ally loaded residence in phase two,
·
New homes being built do not blend with the established
neighborhood,
·
Insufficient side setbacks
·
Requested this application be denied.
The TAB considered the following in
recommending the zone district to R-1.
·
The TAB is reluctant to grant a zone district denser than
required for the project.
·
The project is a better fit in the R-1 zone district than the
R-2 zone district.
·
The current residents’ concerns with density
·
The R-1 zone district will help answer some of the current
resident concerns.
·
The Master developer may not be enforcing the master plan
standards (no representative present at the TAB)
The TAB recommended adding a design review to
the zone change to ensure the Mountain’s Edge architectural standards are
adhered to.
10. ZC-0232-13 – NV NAP9, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning conditions:
•
• Generator
testing only between the hours of
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 2.5 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
data center on 38.1 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
This application is a change to the project
approved in February 2012. This
application moves the electrical substation away from the residential to the
south. It also increases the building
size by 80,000 sq. ft.
Two adjacent residences were concerned about
the mass of the building and what uses are contained in the building.
The TAB added two conditions to help buffer
this project from the residence to the south.
There are a number of generators along the southern building
elevation. The testing of these generators
should only be done during the day when most residents are at work. There is no landscaping proposed along the
southern project boundary. The wall
visible to the residential development to the south will be 12 feet on the
western portion and 18 feet on the eastern portion. The TAB would like the developer to explore
the use of cypress trees along the southern border to provide some buffering
and maintain the required security for the facility.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
HELD to
Discuss forwarding the following concerns and
recommendations to Comprehensive Planning for consideration during the
Enterprise Major Land Use Update (for possible action):
·
Do we plan CMA deed restricted land as though the restrictions
have been removed?
o What policies will be
enforced?
o Review single family
residential uses outside the DNL 60 line
o Review single family
residential uses between the DNL 60 to 65 line
o Could affect a large
number of parcels in
o Presents
opportunities to create significant additional residential uses
·
Examine commercial uses and locations in the Enterprise Land Use
Plan
o
Is Business Design and
o
Consider preserving areas
for primary job creation
o
Review
o
Review commercial uses
within the Business Design and
o
Consider removing all
residential uses within industrial land uses
·
Review Mixed-use Overlay
for the following:
o
Compliance with Title 30
standards
o
Consider removal from
industrial planned areas
o
Consider removal from
airport noise restricted areas DNL 65 and above
·
Review residential
buffering policies
o
Review large lot buffering
policy
o
Review policy on large lot
development standards
·
The Pinnacle Peaks Master
Plan terminates on
o
Consider changing Pinnacle
Peaks Master Plan land use designations to current County standards
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
NONE
NEXT
MEETING DATE:
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
author’s content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments author’s affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly
identified. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David
D. Chestnut, Sr.