Results
The ATTACHMENT A items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED with changes
Companion items:
4. VS-0461-13
VILLAGE AT
5. ZC-0460-13
VILLAGE AT
Held by the applicant to the
H-1. NZC-0138-13
DALEY FAMILY TRUST, ET AL
H-2. VS-0139-13
DALEY FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
·
Update on budget requests from prior fiscal
year. (for possible action)
Build out Cactus from
Cactus will be built out from
Four-way stop at Robindale and Haven.
Robindale and Haven will be studied for an all
way stop.
Complete the intersection at Jones and Blue
Diamond
The completion of Jones north of Blue Diamond
is on the CIP for FY 2016 through FY 2019
Upgrade traffic control device at Robindale
and Placid
What traffic control device needs to be upgraded
at Robindale and Placid?
Align traffic lanes at Cactus and
We are looking at the intersection of Cactus
and
Neighborhood park in the vicinity south of
Blue Diamond, north of Cactus, west of
The FY 2014 Capital Improvement Program was
accepted by the Board July 16th.
Unfunded projects in:
Park District 2 included Silverado Ranch Park
Phase II ($24,475,630) which consisted of a 45,000 sq. ft. recreation/senior
center and renovations of existing park.
Park District 4 unfunded projects included
parks at Cactus and Torrey Pines, Riley and Ford, Le Baron and Rainbow, Pyle
and Jones, Pyle and Lindell among others. The entire plan can be viewed on the
Clark County Intranet site under Finance (a very large file).
·
Discuss
and take public input regarding funding capital budget requests for upcoming
fiscal year. (for possible action)
TAB input:
Complete
the intersection at Jones and Blue Diamond
Build
out Cactus from
Public input:
·Complete the
ZONING
AGENDA:
H-1. NZC-0138-13 DALEY FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
AMENDED HOLDOVER
WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) Allow modifications to standard drawings for public street
sections;
3) Allow modified elevations (no longer required).
Generally located on the
north side of
H-2. VS-0139-13 DALEY FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
HOLDOVER VACATE
1. UC-0463-13
WESTGATE RESORTS,
DENIED
USE PERMIT for a vehicle rental facility
WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following:
1) Increased number of vehicles for rent; and
2) Reduced parking
in conjunction with a commercial building on 2.4 acres in a
C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on the northeast corner of
The plans show a 4,449 square foot lease space proposed
as the vehicle rental facility. The lease space consists of a lobby, sales
desk, offices, storage rooms, and restrooms. The overall building is 18,548
square feet with the remaining areas consisting of a 3,837 square foot
convenience store and vacant lease spaces.
The TAB used the following criteria to evaluate this application.
A use permit is a discretionary land use application that
is considered on a case by case basis in consideration of Title 30 and the
Comprehensive Plan. One of several criteria the applicant must establish is the
use is appropriate at the proposed location and demonstrate the use shall not
result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on adjacent properties.
The TAB determined there are several business currently
occupying the building. The applicant
representative lead the TAB to believe the building was vacant except for
convenience store. The intent is to
control the entire building including the convenience store. The adjacent business owner gave the TAB a
rundown of the business currently operating in this location. The applicant could not provide the current
tenants lease status.
The applicant suggested a condition to specify the spaces
not used for the rental car facility could not be leased. Who can lease a property is not a land use
item and as a result is not enforceable. The land use comes into play when a
use permit is required.
Title 30 currently allows only 5 vehicles for rent when
there are other collocated businesses.
It appears the intent is to force all the other tenants out to increase
the number rental vehicles above 5. It
was pointed out that it would be difficult to enforce the maximum number of vehicles
allowed. Some of the vehicles would be
offsite at any time making the vehicle count difficult.
The owner of this property have opposed land use
applications by the adjacent car rental agency trying to obtain permission to install
business sign on Gilespie.
The TAB determined the application conditions would be
difficult to enforce, would cause adverse effects on the current tenants and
adjacent businesses. Given the
misrepresentation of the current tenant lease status, the use permit is
discretionary, the large waiver required and enforcement difficulties, the TAB
recommend denial.
One item not discussed is will the vehicles be serviced
on or off the property? This would not
be allowed under the requested use permit.
2. UC-0271-11 (ET-0073-13) ROJUSA, LLC:
HELD until the
USE PERMIT FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME to reduce the setback
from a service station to a residential use.
DESIGN REVIEW for a convenience store/service station and a car wash
facility on a portion of 1.8 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial ) (AE-60)
Zone. Generally located on the east side of
3. ZC-0736-09 (ET-0074-13) -
HELD until the
USE PERMITS for the following:
1) A congregate care facility; and
2) Increase building height.
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following:
1) A mixed use development consisting of residential,
congregate care, commercial, and open space; and
2) A manmade decorative water feature.
Generally located on the
north side of
4. VS-0461-13 VILLAGE AT
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
5. ZC-0460-13 VILLAGE AT
APPROVE per
staff conditions and,
ADD Current
Planning conditions:
·
Establish perpetual cross access with
businesses to the south;
·
Design Review as a Public Hearing for
Lighting and Signage.
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to allow modified
landscaping standards.
DESIGN REVIEW for a shopping center.
Generally located on the
east side of
This is a good project for this location. The waiver of development standards is for
reduced landscape width adjacent to an arterial street (
Lighting and signage was not part of the application.
The TAB added the condition for cross access to the south
to increase connectivity between businesses along
The need for the Silverado Ranch center line barrier to
be extended to Giles was discussed.
Currently drivers are going against traffic to go around the
barrier. Extending the barrier to Giles
would increase traffic safety along Silverado Ranch.
6. ZC-0467-13 ROOHANI KHUSROW FAMILY TRUST,
ET AL:
APPROVE Zone
Change per staff condition with following changes;
APPROVE Waivers
of Development Standards 1, 2, 3, and 4a;
DENY Waivers
of Development Standards 4b;
APPROVE Design
Review
CHANGE Public Works -
Development Review bullet #3 to read:
·
Right-of-way dedication to include 35 to 40
feet to back of curb for Lindell Road, 45 to 50 feet to back of curb for
Silverado Ranch Boulevard, 30 feet for
Gary Avenue and associated spandrel;
ADD Public Works -
Development Review condition:
·
Street lighting to be fully shielded;
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Increased building height;
2) Alternative landscaping;
3) Increased wall height; and
4) Non-standard off-site improvements.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development.
Generally located
on the northeast corner of
This application is standard
The application has significant negative
impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
The northern parcel is adjacent to A Clark County School District (CCSD)
elementary school reservation. The
access points to the school site are being reduced by not requiring right-of
way being dedicated for local roads. One site access point was removed by the Mohawk
alignment vacation at Silverado Ranch.
This application, if approved, as presented would remove a second access
to the school site from Lindell.
CCSD solution to the deleted access is to move
the current school reservation 330 ft. north making Richmar the primary
access. A land swap with the County is
required to implement this solution. This
would eliminate the RL land use buffer for the RNP-1 to the north. This solution is strongly opposed by the
RNP-1 residents
The TAB solution is the dedication of
One of the applicants arguments to not
dedicate
The TAB weighed the developers two house loss to
the
The premature street alignment vacations have
caused the loss of or redesign CCSD schools sites. The TAB does not receive staff analysis to
justify the street alignments removal. Instead,
the TAB is presented with the two conditions:
Public Works
Staff has no objection to the vacation of
patent easements that are not necessary for site, drainage or roadway
development.
Fire Department
This department has no objection to vacating
streets/roads and/or easements that are not needed for fire/emergency vehicle
access.
These conditions are essentially meaningless
without staff analysis. Many applications reviewed by the TAB, the area
is not sufficiently developed to determine which street alignments are required
for fire/emergency vehicle access and road development. The result is the road alignments should not
be vacated.
The TAB has become the de facto recommending
body for local roads.
In this application
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
TAB to consider recommendation for a change to
Title 30.52.080.d.2 Improvement Requirements for a Minor Subdivision. (for
possible action)
APPROVED
Motion to authorize the Chair to write a
letter on the subject of this agenda item to be reviewed by the Board at the
next meeting
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
1.
Question from the public about the notification cards requirements.
The cards must be mailed 10 days prior to the
Planning Commission or Zoning Commission meetings; not the TAB meeting. The application type required determines the
500 to 1500 foot surrounding coverage area.
2. A
TAB member commented on the lack of information on roads, county site
reservation, hillside ordinances for the open space areas in
3. The
county liaison announced that a different approach to working through the many
non-conforming zone change neighborhood meetings will be tried on
4.
Question from the public about the master plan review public
meetings.
The
meeting process will begin in the fall
There
will be an open house (tentative date
Staff
review of the plan
Perhaps
a second open house
Public
meetings at the TAB, Planning Commission and Board of County
Commissioners, Finished June 2014.
ADJOURNMENT:
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
authors content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments authors affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly
identified. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David
D. Chestnut, Sr.