1. NZC-0575-13 - STARR & HAVEN, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and the following:
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Density
is limited to 6 units/acre
ADD Public Works condition:
·
Street
light to fully shielded.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 11.4 acres from R-U (Rural Open Land) Zone and R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone for a single family
residential development in the MUD-4 Overlay District.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the southeast corner of Haven Street and Starr Avenue within Enterprise (description on file).
SS/al/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
A recent BCC decision has changed the nature
of the land use east of Las Vegas Blvd. and south of Starr to residential. Some land in this area is still planned for
commercial which most likely will change to residential in the land use update.
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The TAB added two conditions. First, the density to be restrict to no more
than 7 units/acre. TAB reasoning is the
schools are overcrowded and each new residential project will add to that
overcrowding. Any increase in density
for this project should require a public hearing due to the effect on public
services.
The TAB has consistently recommended street
lighting be fully shielded. His helps
produce an aesthetically pleasing neighborhood while maintaining a safe
lighting level.
The TAB had questions about the easement for
the power line along the Doobie right of way.
The applicant indicated the power line could be placed underground but
did not answer the question on the easement required. The plan presented may not be possible due to
the power line easement.
2. VS-0604-13 - STARR & HAVEN, LLC, ET
AL:
APPROVED per staff conditions:
VACATE
AND ABANDON a portion
of right-of-way being Doobie Avenue located between Haven Street and Rancho Destino
Road within
Enterprise (description on file).
SS/al/ml (For possible action)
The TAB had questions about the easement for
the power line along the Doobie right of way.
The applicant indicated the power line could be placed underground but
did not answer the question on the easement required. The plan presented may not be possible due to
the power line easement.
3. NZC-0576-13 -STARR & HAVEN, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and the following:
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Density
is limited to 7 units/acre
ADD Public Works condition:
·
Street
light to fully shielded.
ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 1.0 acre from R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone for a single family
residential development in the MUD-4 Overlay District.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the northeast corner of Haven Street and Neal
Avenue within Enterprise (description
on file). SS/al/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
A recent BCC decision has changed the nature
of the land use east of Las Vegas Blvd. and south of Starr to residential. Some the area is still planned for commercial
which most likely will change in the land use update.
The cumulative impact of numerous small projects
will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require creation of
primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial, roads and
public facilities.
The TAB added two conditions. First, the density to be restrict to no more
than 7 units/acre. TAB reasoning is the
schools are overcrowded and each new residential project will add to that
overcrowding. Any increase in density
for this project should require a public hearing due to the effect on public
services.
The TAB is consistently recommended the
installed street lighting be fully shielded.
4. NZC-0579-13 -ROOHANI KHUSROW FAMILY
TRUST:
DENY Zone Change and Design
Review per staff "if approved" conditions and,
ADD Current Planning "if
approved" condition:
·
Maximum
height is limited to 29 feet.
ZONE CHANGE to reclassify 2.6 acres from R-D (Suburban Estates
Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone for a single family
residential development.
DESIGN REVIEW for a single family residential development. Generally located on the northwest corner of Neal Avenue and Placid
Street within Enterprise (description
on file). SS/al/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The applicant’s position is the densities to
the east and south justify the increase in density. The tab and staff position is the currently
planned density is appropriate for the ten acre neighborhood. The adjacent properties are all greater than
17,000 sq. ft. Any density above R-D is
not appropriate for this property.
The TAB limited the building height to 29 ft.
to preclude the applicant three story model in this area. A three story model would be out of place in
this neighborhood. The highest two story
model is 29 feet.
5. NZC-0582-13 -10 STARR BERMUDA, LLC, ET AL:
DENY
Zone Change and Design
Review per staff "if approved" conditions and,
ADD Current Planning "if approved"
condition:
• Limit
density to 5.7 units per acre;
ADD Public works "if approved" condition:
• Street Lights
to be fully shielded.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 9.8 acres from C-1 (Local Business) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone for a single family residential development.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the southwest corner of Starr Avenue and Bermuda Road within Enterprise (description on file).
SS/al/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The applicant’s position is this area does not
have sufficient residential density to support a retail/commercial development
and the area south of St Rose parkway is where the retail will be located.
The city of Henderson has programed that area
for industrial use around the Executive airport. There is significant established residential
density to the east in the city of Henderson.
This area is in a transition from hotel-resort
and commercial to residential. This
transition has been furthered by recent BCC decisions. It is too early in the transition process to
eliminate the all commercial along Starr.
The residential density in the area will increase as the transition
occurs. Traffic at Starr and Bermuda
will increase when the I-15/Starr interchange is completed. The elimination of commercial at this
location may significantly increase the traffic flow in other area as residents
seek retail establishments.
10/15/13 PC
6. NZC-0131-13 - CACTUS & BERMUDA, LLC, ET
AL:
APPROVED per staff conditions
with applicant added conditions:
·
The maximum number of
lots shall be 60.
·
Lots numbered 3, 4, 5,
6, 26, 27, 28 and 29 will be constructed as single story homes.
·
No vehicular access from
Placid Street to Rush Avenue.
·
Fairfield Avenue shall
be vacated.
·
Construct a 9 foot high
perimeter decorative block wall along the north property line on Rush Avenue.
·
Construct a 9 foot high
perimeter decorative block wall adjacent to APN: 177-28-803-006 (Rogers
property).
·
Construction traffic
outside the development along Rush Avenue and Placid Street is prohibited.
·
An emergency access gate
to be constructed on Rush Avenue between Lot 1 and Lot 60. Final design and location to be approved by
the County.
·
Internal lighting shall
be coach lighting on the homes. No
interior street lights.
·
Any significant changes
to the site plan will require a new design review as a public hearing before
the Board of County Commissioners.
AMENDED HOLDOVER
ZONE CHANGE to reclassify
21.9 acres from R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) Zone
and R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone to R-D (Suburban Estates Residential District) Zone
(previously notified as R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone).
USE PERMIT for a residential planned unit development (no longer part
of the request).
WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the
following:
1) Reduced street intersection off-set;
2) Increase the length of a street without a County
approved turnaround;
3) Waive full off-site improvements;
4) Modified
street improvements in accordance with Clark County's Uniform Standard Drawings
(no longer part of the request); and
5) Reduced front setback (previously not notified).
DESIGN REVIEW for a residential development (previously notified as a
residential planned unit development). Generally located
on the north side of Cactus Avenue and the west side of Bermuda Road within Enterprise (description on file). SS/rk/ml
(For possible action)
There was no opposition to this application, a
significant difference from the first time it was heard. This application has been negotiated for the
last six months between the residents and the applicant with several
variations. The proposed density is that
recommended by the TAB when the application was first heard. The plan has a number of conditions agreed to
by the applicant and the residents.
Those conditions were incorporated as part of the TAB
recommendation.
7. VS-0132-13 - CACTUS
& BERMUDA. LLC. ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
HOLDOVER VACATE
AND ABANDON easements of interest to Clark
County located between Cactus Avenue and Frias
Avenue and between Bermuda Road and La Cienega Street; and a portion of right-of-way being Placid Street
located between Cactus Avenue and Rush Avenue; and a portion of right-of-way being Fairfield Avenue
located between Cactus Avenue and Rush Avenue; and a portion of Cactus Avenue located between Bermuda Road and La Cienega Street in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone within Enterprise (description on file). SS/rk/ed
(For possible action)
The TAB does not agree with the Public Works
analysis. The TAB position is the access
to the RNP-1 should be limited, while the local roads within RNP-1 be used to
distribute the traffic. This application
accomplished those objectives.
11/07/13 PC
8. NZC-0547-13 - UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 1.1 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and H-2 (General
Highway Frontage) Zone to M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone for a parking lot in
conjuuction with an approved office building in the MUD-2 Overlay District.
Generally located on the
south side of Agate Avenue (alignment), 300 feet west of Jones Boulevard within Enterprise (description on file).
SB/pb/ml (For possible action)
9. NZC-0544-13 -ROOHANI
KHUSROW FAMILY TRUST:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
and,
ADD a Public Works condition:
• Street
lights to be fully shielded;
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 2.0 acres of a 5.0 acre site from C-2 (General Commercial) Zone to
RUD (Residential Urban Density) Zone.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
compact lot single family residential development on 5.0 acres. Generally located on the southeast corner of Cactus
Avenue and Mann Street
within Enterprise (description on file).
SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
This property was The TAB is concerned that
there is not sufficient parking along Mann Street. The PUB development to the west is currently
using the east side of Mann Street for parking.
The applicant’s positions is there are four parking place provided for
each residence.
10. NZC-0568-13 -ROOHANI
KHUSROW FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
DENIED
per staff “if approved”
conditions and,
STRIKE
Public Works bullet #3;
ADD if approved condition:
• Waive full off-sites except for 32 feet of paving on Lindell, Agate,
and Westwind.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 9.1 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and H-2 (General
Highway Frontage) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone for a single
family residential development in the MUD-3 Overlay District.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
reduce street intersection off-set.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the northeast corner of Westwind Road and Agate
Avenue within
Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
There is significant resident opposition to
this application. It is opposed by
residential property owners on all sides of this project. No abutting resident spoke in favor of this
project.
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The applicant has not met the compelling
justification standards. In addition,
the project does not take into account the current direction from the BCC. The eastern acreage is land use planned for
RNP. The western acreage is planned for
Commercial Neighborhood and Residential Suburban.
The site is bordered by established RNP-1 on
two sides and a large lot neighborhood to the west. Also on the west is a PUB project. The
eastern, north side has new construction on a 1 Ľ acre property. That resident has removed the old structure
and is in the process of construct a large home. There is no buffering between the RNP and
this project.
This project removes RNP land use and does not
promote a cohesive neighborhood.
11. NZC-0541-13 -FLP
HOLDINGS, LLC:
DENIED
per staff “if approved”
conditions and,
ADD if approved Current Planning condition:
• Comply
with Mountains Edge architectural, lighting, and, landscape standards.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 5.0 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone for a single family residential development.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for non-standard street improvements.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the south side of Cactus Avenue, 1,330 feet east of
Durango Drive
within Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The TAB agrees with the following staff
analysis:
The applicant generally states that approval
of the Mountain's Edge major project constitutes a change that would make this
request consistent with surrounding development. However, the aforementioned
project is master planned and went through a process to address land use
planning on a more comprehensive scale. A request to reclassify 5 acres outside
of the disposal boundary surrounded and within an area designated as Open
Space/Public Lands Management area is not consistent with the development
pattern. There are no unique or special circumstances that have occurred in the
immediate area since the adoption of the Enterprise Land Use Plan to make this
request appropriate. The site is located in a predominantly undeveloped area,
which consists of a few privately owned parcels and approximately 270 acres of
BLM land.
This area must be thoroughly planned before
development is allowed. If this project
goes forward it should comply with the Mountains Edge standards.
12. NZC-0540-13 -
BRINTON. ROBERT B.:
DENIED
per staff “if approved”
conditions and,
ADD if approved conditions:
• Comply
with Mountains Edge architectural, lighting, and, landscape standards.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 5.0 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone for a single family residential development.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the west side of Buffalo Drive, 640 feet south of
Cactus Avenue
within Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The TAB agrees with the following staff
analysis:
The applicant generally states that approval
of the Mountain's Edge major project constitutes a change that would make this
request consistent with surrounding development. However, the aforementioned
project is master planned and went through a process to address land use
planning on a more comprehensive scale. A request to reclassify 5 acres outside
of the disposal boundary surrounded and within an area designated as Open
Space/Public Lands Management area is not consistent with the development
pattern. There are no unique or special circumstances that have occurred in the
immediate area since the adoption of the Enterprise Land Use Plan to make this
request appropriate. The site is located in a predominantly undeveloped area,
which consists of a few privately owned parcels and approximately 270 acres of
BLM land.
This area must be thoroughly planned before
development is allowed. If this project
goes forward it should comply with the Mountains Edge standards.
13. NZC-0556-13 -R&SC
RENTALS, INC:
DENIED
per staff “if approved”
conditions and,
ADD Current Planning if approved conditions:
• Comply with Mountains Edge architectural, lighting, and, landscape
standards.
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 5.0 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone for a single family residential development.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the south side of Cactus Avenue, 1,000 feet east of
Durango Drive
within Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The cumulative impact of numerous small
projects will have a significant impact on the need for schools; require
creation of primary job opportunities; conveniently located retail/commercial,
roads and public facilities.
The TAB agrees with the following staff
analysis:
The applicant generally states that approval
of the Mountain's Edge major project constitutes a change that would make this
request consistent with surrounding development. However, the aforementioned
project is master planned and went through a process to address land use planning
on a more comprehensive scale. A request to reclassify 5 acres outside of the
disposal boundary surrounded and within an area designated as Open Space/Public
Lands Management area is not consistent with the development pattern. There are
no unique or special circumstances that have occurred in the immediate area
since the adoption of the Enterprise Land Use Plan to make this request
appropriate. The site is located in a predominantly undeveloped area, which
consists of a few privately owned parcels and approximately 270 acres of BLM
land.
This area must be thoroughly planned before
development is allowed. If this project
goes forward it should comply with the Mountains Edge standards.
14. NZC-0542-13 -NATURE
BOY TRUST, ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
and,
ADD Current Planning conditions:
• Density
limited to 5.2 units/acre
• Project
must comply with Mountains Edge architectural, lighting, and landscape
standards.
• Design
Review as a Public Hearing for significant changes to plans;
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 5.0 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone for a single family residential development.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the southeast corner of Buffalo Drive and Cactus
Avenue within
Enterprise (description on file). SB/rk/ml (For possible action)
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on
neighborhood and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
A recent BCC decisions has changed the nature
of the land use at Cactus and Buffalo.
This corner is transitioning from commercial to residential. This application finishes that transition. The property is an in-fill project. Because it is an in-fill project it is not
required to follow the Mountains Edge standards. The TAB added a condition to insure the
project will blend into the surround community.
The cumulative impact of numerous small
project approvals will have a significant impact on schools in this area. Currently the schools are significantly over
capacity. The TAB recommendation is the
density be limited to applicant planed density.
Any increase density should require a public hearing.
15. NZC-0560-13 -DAVID
OBER FAMILY TRUST, ET AL:
Motion for:
APPROVE
·
Zone
Change for parcel east of Park Street
·
Design
Review
DENY
·
Zone
Change for parcel west of Park street
Per staff recommendations and conditions
APPROVED
ZONE
CHANGE to
reclassify 5.2 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and H-2 (General
Highway Frontage) Zone to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the MUD-3
Overlay District.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the north side of Serene Avenue and the east and west
sides of Park Street
within Enterprise (description on file). SB/pb/ml (For possible action)
No builder associated with this
development. The plans present by the
applicant are American West Plans obtained during previous business dealings. At the TAB hearing the American West
representative clearly state that they are not associated with this
application. It appears that this project is highly speculative and will likely
change in the future.
The TAB position on the non-conforming zone
changes was based upon answering the following:
·
What
significant changes have occurred in the neighborhood to compel this
application?
·
What
is the cumulative effect of the numerous non-conforming zone changes on neighborhood
and public services?
·
Does
the non-conforming zone change significantly alter the land use plan?
·
Has
the applicant met the Title 30 compelling justification?
The parcel east of Park Street is affected by
BCC recent actions and should be granted The R-2 zone district. This will create a cohesive
neighborhood. The TAB agrees with the Staff
analysis on the parcel west of Park Street.
The applicant indicates that the development
trends in this portion of Enterprise have changed to residential; however, the
single family residential development approved to the north and east conformed
to the Enterprise Land Use Plan. All of the land to the west of Park Street north
of Serene Avenue is designated as Commercial General and Business and
Design/Research Park in the land use plan and undeveloped with the exception of
single family dwellings on 2.5 acre lots. Staff finds that there have been no
significant changes in law, policies, trends, or
facts to make this amendment appropriate.