Results
The Zoning Agenda items
will be heard on the following dates:
Planning Commission 7:00
P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The
PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An
appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to
find out how to file an appeal. Help in
filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network
(SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click
on the blue underlined
text it will take you
to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR BUSINESS
1. Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2. Approve the Agenda with any corrections,
deletions or changes. APROVED
1. Items on the agenda
may be taken out of order.
2. The Town Advisory
Board may combine two or more agenda items for consideration.
Companion items:
2. TM-0082-14 - HANSON FAMILY, LLC:
3. VS-0474-14 - HANSON FAMILY, LLC:
4. WS-0475-14 – HANSON FAMILY, LLC
7. TM-0090-14 –
8. UC-0519-14 –
11. VS-0516-14 - STORYBOOK INVESTMENTS, LLC:
13. WS-0515-14 – STORYBOOK INVESTMENTS, LLC:
16. TM-0087-14 – SUNSET JONES, LLC:
18. ZC-0495-14 – SUNSET JONES, LLC:
3. The Town Advisory
Board may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an
item at any time.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS: NONE
ZONING AGENDA:
1. WS-0466-14 – SILVERADO PROMENADE, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Eliminate landscaping
along a street; and
2) Allow non-standard
improvements within the right-of-way
In
conjunction with an approved shopping center on 13.9 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located on the southeast corner of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
2. TM-0082-14 - HANSON FAMILY, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning
condition:
• Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 as presented on the plot plan be are single story.
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
The developer has
worked with the neighbors and has made significant changes to their plans. Alternate drainage patterns were examined by
the developer. It was found the amount
of fill required could be reduced and as a result the Waiver of Development
Standard #1 was withdrawn by the applicant.
The project is a much better fit for the neighborhood than originally
presented.
After discussion with
the neighbors the developer has committed to placing single story homes on the
eastern boundary. This eliminated the
need for a landscape buffer on the eastern border.
3. VS-0474-14 - HANSON FAMILY, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
4. WS-0475-14 – HANSON FAMILY, LLC:
Waivers of Development
Standards #1 WITHDRAWN by applicant;
Current Planning "If
Approved" conditions bullet #2 DELETED by request of the applicant;
ADD Current Planning "If
Approved" condition:
·
Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 presented on plot plan are single story;
The Board recommends that
the developer work with the adjacent residents so that no redundant wall is
built.
APPROVED 4-1 (Chestnut nay)
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following:
1) Increased wall height;
and
2) Full off-site
improvements (partial paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights) along
Serene Avenue.
DESIGN
REVIEW
for a single family residential development on 5.3 acres in an R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the south
side of Serene Avenue and the east side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
The developer has
worked with the neighbors and has made significant changes to their plans. Alternate drainage patterns were examined by
the developer. It was found the amount
of fill required could be reduced and as a result the Waiver of Development
Standard #1 was withdrawn by the applicant.
The project is a much better fit for the neighborhood than originally
presented.
After discussion with
the neighbors the developer has committed to placing single story homes on the
eastern boundary. This eliminated the
need for a landscape buffer on the eastern border.
The developer is currently
in discussion with the neighbors along the eastern border to replace the
current block wall instead of building a redundant wall. The TAB cannot condition this because it
involves a private agreement between two or more landowners. The TAB did request the property owner’s work
together to have a single wall.
The one area of
disagreement among the TAB members is the subdivision gating. The two points of view are:
· The development
pattern in this area south of
· The
5. ZC-0449-14 – ALON & ROSANA MILLER
FAMILY TRUST 1992:
APPROVED Zone Change reduced to R-1 per staff conditions
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
This item was held to
determine if a plot plan should be presented as part of the application. The
number of lots and design was covered in the applicant’s description. However, no plot plan was presented. The applicant has a potential plot plan but
did not choose to make it a formal part of this application. The TAB opinion is without the ability to
condition the density this application should not be approved as
presented. The reduction to R-1 indicates
the TAB objection to 41 lots proposed for this project. The attempt is to lock in the number of lots
while not providing an actual plot plan.
The TAB position is
exceptional design could not be determined to justify the maximum density and
the public facilities are stretched to their capacity limit. Additional density in this area is not in the
public interest. Future Design Review
should include reduced density, the actual plot plan and the building
elevations.
6. VC-0159-13 (ET-0069-14) – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VARIANCES FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME to complete the following:
1) Increased building
height;
2) Reduced front yard
setback; and
3) Reduced rear yard
setback
In
conjunction with a single family residential development on 29.8 acres in an
R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the Pinnacle Peaks Concept Plan Area. Generally located on the south side of
7. TM-0090-14 –
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Public Works – Development
Review condition:
• Gate queuing study and compliance;
TENTATIVE
Public works requested
the applicant add a condition for a gate queuing analysis.
8. UC-0519-14 –
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Public Works – Development
Review:
• Gate queuing analysis and compliance;
APPROVE Use Permit;
WAIVERS 1 & 2 do not to apply
to large lots indicated on the plan presented;
• Allow early final grading for all lots;
APPROVE Design Review for plot
plan only. No elevations presented
USE PERMIT to increase the retaining wall height.
WAIVERS for the following:
1) Allow modified street
improvement standards;
3) Allow early final
grading.
DESIGN REVIEW for single family
residential development on approximately 119.0 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone under ROI to R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, R-3
(Multiple Family Residential) Zone, and H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone
all in a P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Southern
Highlands Master Planned Community. Generally located on the west
side of Interstate 15 and the south side of
Plot plans were
presented for three of the five areas within the tentative map. The TAB would not recommend granting waivers
for areas where no plot plans were presented.
The TAB conditioned its recommendation for waivers # 1 & 2 to
exclude the two large lots with no plot plans.
The applicant indicated early grading would be required on all five
areas. Because this is covered by
grading plan and must be approved by Public Works the TAB recommended approval.
The Design Review was
approved for the plot plans presented only because no building elevations were
presented by the applicant. The TAB did
not consider the statement; they are the same as other Southern highlands
projects, adequate for the elevation design review.
9. VS-0506-14 – SALOMONSON, LORRIE:
APPROVED per
staff conditions and,
NOTE for the record that what
is being vacated is the
VACATE
The TAB has no
objection to the vacation of
The TAB did question
how this application describes the property.
The right-of-way has its own ANP that was not referenced in the
application. The two APNs
referenced in the application were north and south of the actual right-of-way.
10. VS-0510-14 – P8 Arden, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
11. VS-0516-14 - STORYBOOK INVESTMENTS, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
VACATE
12. WS-0504-14 – CA
APPROVED per staff conditions
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
to allow a wall sign in a residential district.
DESIGN REVIEW for signage in
conjunction with an approved school and day care facility on 5.0 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on the south
side of
13. WS-0515-14 – STORYBOOK INVESTMENTS, LLC:
APPROVE Waiver of Development
Standards 1a & 1b;
DENY Waiver of Development
Standards 2 & 3
Per
staff conditions.
Motion PASSED
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduced setbacks;
2) Increased wall height;
and
3) Allow finished grade
elevations to exceed 18 inches in height
In
conjunction with an approved single family residential development on 1.3 acres
in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
Lots 9 and 10 have the
houses side loaded to the private road in the plot plan presented. These two lots are located on the eastern
property border. The established homes
to the east have their side yards along this boundary also. This would place side yard to side yard for
the existing homes and the proposed homes.
Give this unusual configuration the reduced setback waiver is
appropriate.
The TAB is strongly
opposed to Waiver of Development standards #s 2 & 3. These waivers would allow a redundant wall
considerably higher that the property wall to the east. In addition the requested pad height would be
close to 5 feet higher than the established home 10 feet away. This is not an acceptable way to develop a
neighborhood. Other developers have
found ways to connect the utilities and establish drainage without excessive
fill used. They have also worked with
the adjacent neighbors to eliminate the need for a redundant wall.
Previously, the TAB
had recommended the Tentative Map be denied.
However, it was approved by the PC on the routine action agenda without
comment or reasons given for TAB recommendation rejection.
14. WS-0522-14 – KB HOME
Initial
Motion:
APPROVED per staff conditions with,
Current
Planning bullet #2 deleted.
Motion to
reconsider: APPROVED
APPROVED Waiver of Development
Standards 1a, 1b, & 1c;
Per staff conditions deleting Current Planning bullets 1 and 2.
Motion PASSED
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
to increase wall heights in conjunction with an approved single family
residential development on 21.9 acres in an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the north side of
There have been
extensive negotiations by all parties on how this property will develop. When the grading plan was finalized, it was
determined that a wall height waiver on would be required to meet previously
approved conditions.
The neighbors directly
affected by the higher walls were present and stated their agreement with the
developer’s request. Current planning
bullets #1 & 2 restricted the wall heights and required landscape where it
is not practical due to Public Works requirements. With the approval of Waiver of Developments
1a, 1b, 1c the two bullets are not necessary or appropriate.
15. DR-0518-14 – R.I. HERITAGE INN OF FLINT, INC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning conditions:
· No illuminated sign on the
eastern elevation.
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following:
1) Hotel;
2) Site lighting; and
3) Signage
On 3.0
acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay
District. Generally
located on the north side of
The new design is
significantly better than the first design present to the TAB.
The applicant could
not tell the TAB if the sign on the eastern elevation was illuminated or
not. The TAB added the condition to
ensure the sign toward the residential is not illuminated.
16. TM-0087-14 – SUNSET JONES, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
17. UC-0525-14 – CACTUS
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning conditions:
·
Design Review as a Public Hearing for Lighting and Signage;
·
Establish perpetual cross access to the property to the west if
compatible commercial uses are established to the west.
USE PERMITS for the following:
1) Car wash;
2) Gasoline station; and
3) Reduce the separation
from a gasoline station to a residential use in conjunction with an approved
shopping center and convenience store.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to reduce driveway separation.
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a zone change
(ZC-0726-07) requiring mansard roof treatment on the west elevation to match
the east elevation as approved by staff.
DESIGN REVIEW for a shopping center
including 2 pad sites on 4.0 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on west side of
Lighting and signage
were not covered in this application.
The TAB recommends a Design Review for both items due to the close
proximity to established homes.
The TAB’s consistent position is cross is essential for
customer and traffic flow between adjoining commercial properties.
18. ZC-0495-14 – SUNSET JONES, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning
condition:
• Design Review as a Public Hearing for Lighting and Signage
DESIGN REVIEW for an office building
in conjunction with an existing shopping center on 3.0 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) (AE-60) Zone in the
Lighting and signage
were not covered in this application.
The TAB has consistently recommended a Design Review for both items when
not covered in the application.
PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE
ADJOURNMENT:
The statements, opinions
and observations expressed in this document are solely those of the
author. The opinions stated in this
document are not the official position of any government board, organization or
group. The project descriptions,
ordinances board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available
Clark County Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as
long as the author’s content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments author’s affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly
identified. This attribution statement
must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.