Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard on the
following dates:
Planning Commission
7:00 P.M.,
Board of
HOLDOVER/RETURNED
APPLICATIONS will be heard on the date in the applications header.
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you “ctrl”+click on the blue
underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to
explain the agenda item.
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on July 9, 2014. APPROVED
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
1. Items on the agenda may be taken out of
order.
2. The Town Advisory Board may combine two or
more agenda items for consideration.
The following zoning applications are
companion applications and will be heard together:
8.
TM-0103-14 - ROBINSON, JAMES & DONNA
13.
ZC-0597-14 – ROBINSON, JAMES & DONNA
3. The Town Advisory Board may remove an item
from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item at any time.
Zoning item #7, TM-0102-14 - DRB HOLDINGS,
LLC, ET AL, has been held per request of the applicant until the August 13,
2014 TAB meeting.
Notice of Neighborhood Meeting – Pre
application meeting:
Thursday, July 31, 2014, 6:00 pm,
4565 West Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118
(Old Floor Designs of Nevada Offices)
To receive input from neighboring businesses
regarding a proposed Pic-A-Part Yard at the subject
location.
Enterprise Land Use Plan Update Open House
August 4, 2014
Windmill Library
7060 W. Windmill Ln.,
3:30 to 7:30 PM
RNP Meeting Sponsored by Commissioner Brager
August 7, 2014
Desert Breeze Community Center
8275 Spring Mountain Road
6:00 to 8:00 PM
Enterprise Land Use Plan Update Public
Hearings
All hearings at:
Clark County Government Center
Commission Chambers
500 S. Grand Central Pky.
Las Vegas NV 89155-1712
Enterprise Town Advisory Board
August 13, 2014, 6:00 pm – area west of
Decatur
August 14, 2014, 6:00 pm – area east of
Decatur
Planning Commission September 16, 2014, 7:00 PM
Board of County Commissioners October 22, 2014, 9:00 AM
Call for a volunteer representative and an
alternate from Enterprise to serve on the Clark County Community Development
Advisory committee (CDAC) for the County's Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program. TAB will take
applications during August and nominate representatives at the August 27, 2014
TAB meeting.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS:
1. Liaison
update TAB on budget requests from prior fiscal year. (For possible action.)
Enterprise 2013/2014 Budget Request Update
·
Complete
the intersection at Jones and Blue Diamond
o Design will start mid-2015, need UPRR
agreement, construction is anticipated in mid-2017
·
Build-out
Cactus from Buffalo to Durango
o Project is currently not on any design list
·
Complete
the Durango Drive intersection south of Blue Diamond. Only 1 of 7 entrances to
Mountains Edge from Blue Diamond Road is fully built-out.
o NDOT is currently making some improvements at
the intersection. Clark County Public Works will look to do some widening on
the south leg when they are done. Currently CCPW are working on Durango, Blue
Diamond to Windmill as an
·
Connect
Agate from any point west of Melrose Park St. to previous Jones/Oleta intersection with 32 feet of paving
o CCPW will look at options for this with
Jones/Blue Diamond request above
·
Decatur
built-out to 4 lanes between Warm Spring to Blue Diamond
o Decatur, Cactus to Warm Springs - CCPW just
started design. Construction should commence in late 2015.
·
Jones
built-out to 4 lanes between Blue Diamond to Erie/Shinnecock
Hills
o Jones, Cactus to Blue Diamond —programmed for
design in 2015, construction in 2016
·
Durango
built-out to 4 lanes between Blue Diamond to Shelbourne
o Currently CCPW are working on Durango, Blue
Diamond to Windmill as an
·
Review
and rework the drainage on Camero between Durango to Tomsik.
o CCPW will look into further
·
Enterprise
Community Center & Enterprise Senior Center
o Clark County Real Property Management has no
funding, so no update unless the projects are funded. (JS) Unfunded projects
for Park District 2 include Silverado Ranch Park Phase II ($24,475,630) which
consists of a 45,000 sf recreation/senior center and
renovations of existing park.
·
Neighborhood
park in the area bounded by Decatur, Silverado Ranch,
Jones and Blue Diamond.
o Park District 4 unfunded projects include
parks at Cactus and Torrey Pines, Le Baron and
Rainbow, Pyle and Jones, Pyle and Lindell.
2. TAB discuss and take public input regarding suggestions for
next funding year budget requests. (For possible action.) Continued to the August 27 TAB meeting.
ZONING
AGENDA:
08/06/14
1. UC-0541-14 – DARUL-
DENIED 4-1 (Chestnut nay)
USE
PERMIT for a
place of worship.
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce parking;
2) Waive or provide alternative screening and
landscape buffering;
3)
Waive architectural
design standards (wood shake roof);
4) Reduce drive aisle width;
5) Reduce setback from a trash enclosure to a
residential use;
6) Reduce driveway design standards in accordance
with Clark County’s Uniform Standard Drawings; and
7) Waive full off-site improvements (partial
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights) along Warm Springs Road and
Hinson Street.
DESIGN REVIEW
to convert an existing single family residence to a place of worship on 0.5
acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the
north side of Warm Springs Road and the east side of Hinson Street
within Enterprise. SS/dg/xx (For possible action)
PREVIOUS
ACTION
Enterprise TAB July 9, 2014: HELD (5-0) to the
July 30, 2014 TAB meeting per request of the applicant: The applicant did not
have plot plan (Previously heard)
The neighborhood comments on this application
are: (65 neighbors at the first meeting
and 45 neighbors at this hearing.)
·
There
is general support for the Use Permit.
·
There
is general opposition to the Waivers of Development Standards and Design
Review.
·
Property
is too small for the intended use
·
Too
many waivers.
·
Concerned
about the future expansion and possible overflow parking.
·
Traffic
safety compromised with driveway too close to corner.
·
Insufficient
landscaping for buffering.
The applicant was not well prepared for the
hearing. The plot plan presented was not
reviewed by the staff and did not have sufficient measurements to make
meaningful conclusions. In addition,
this plan has not been reviewed by the staff.
The applicant initially stated only three waivers were needed. Upon TAB review it was determined that at
least five waivers would be required for this application.
Several individuals in favor of the
application indicated the intended use is as a community center. This is a separate use with different
standards which added to the confusion in the hearing.
The staff found the following “the
establishment of a place of worship at this location, adjacent to an arterial
street, is consistent with all Title 30 provisions, but has concerns regarding
the site, excessive number of waivers of development standards, and other
elements of the project. Those concerns will be addressed with the waiver of
development standards and design review portion of this request.” The TAB opinion is there is not sufficient
room on this property to apply significant mitigation measures to make the
waivers acceptable. The other places of
worship in the area have complied with Title 30 requirements and blend into the
neighborhood.
The TAB opinion is the property is too small
for the intended use as evidenced by the number of waivers required. Two areas
that could impact the design lacked sufficient information to approve the
presented design. Those areas are the
commercial septic requirements (larger septic field maybe needed) and
compliance with the fire and building codes.
Compliance with those codes may require a new design for the property.
There was some confusion over the road
standards waiver. A number of
individuals’ present believed the waiver would relieve the applicant of any
financial responsibility for the roads.
This not the case, the waiver would only delays paying for the roads until
the roads are developed by the County.
The applicant would be required to sign a restrictive convent to pay for
the road when required by the County.
One TAB member believed the Use Permit should
have been granted with the Waivers of Development Standards and Design Review
turned down.
08/19/14
PC
2. UC-0586-14 – CHURCH BAPTIST CHINESE, INC.,
ET AL:
APPROVED per staff conditions
USE
PERMIT for a
place of worship.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce parking on 2.2 acres in an M-D (Design Manufacturing) Zone in the
MUD-3 Overlay District. Generally located on the
south side of Ford Avenue and the west side of Lindell
Road within Enterprise.
SB/jvm/ml (For possible
action)
3. UC-0598-14
– 2010-1
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning
conditions:
• Outside
storage items cannot be stacked higher than the surrounding wall.
• Design
Review as a public hearing for lighting.
USE
PERMIT to allow
a portion of an outside storage yard in front of the building.
DESIGN
REVIEW for an
outside storage yard in conjunction with a partially constructed
office/warehouse building on 5.0 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone
within the MUD-3 and
There is a pending residential application on
the west side of redwood. With the residential
potential, there should be a design reviews for lighting and signage as these
items may affect the proposed residential.
The
4. VC-0585-14 – LUZICH, MICHAEL:
DENIED per staff “If Approved” conditions
VARIANCES for the following:
1)
Allow an accessory
structure (perimeter wall) prior to the principal use (single family
residence); and
2) Increased wall height
on 0.6 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Southern
Highlands Master Planned Community. Generally located 400 feet
south of Highlander Golf Lane and 450 feet west of Oakland Hills Drive on Quintessa Circle within Enterprise. SB/rk/ml (For possible
action)
The increase wall height is not consistent
with the neighborhood. A neighbor
testified that the other homes in the area have 4 foot wall required by the
code. The applicant’s diagram showed
four feet of fill with four feet of retaining wall. The staff report indicated the finished grade
is the same on both sides of the wall.
This inconsistence was not resolved by the applicant’s
representative.
The applicant does have permission from the Southern
highlands architectural committee for the increased wall height.
The TAB agreed with the staff analysis which
stated: “Since the property line adjacent to the street frontage is over 225
feet in length, and 2 to 4 feet higher than a standard block wall, staff finds
the increased wall height would be inconsistent with the neighboring properties
and could be visually detrimental to the area since there will be no open front
yard to this lot. Additionally, staff has found no showing of legal hardship or
practical difficulty to justify the variance as required by Code. It is
incumbent upon the applicant to prove a legal hardship or practical difficulty
at this time.”
The TAB agreed with the staff position and the
neighbor against this application.
5. VS-0575-14 – GREYSTONE NEVADA, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
6. WS-0593-14 – HARMONY
DENIED per staff “If Approved” conditions
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
reduce the rear yard setback on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the southwest corner of Robindale
Road and Hauck Street within Enterprise. SS/jvm/ml (For possible
action)
The TAB recommendation is this setback
reduction should not be approved.
This is a case where the product is too big
for the lot size being planned. A second
floor overhang of 4.4 feet set back from the rear property line leaves no real
usable area in the backyard. The
interior lots with adjoining back yards would have less than 9 feet of total
separation between the second floors. This
is distance too small and may not comply with the fire codes.
08/20/14
7. TM-0102-14 - DRB HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL:
HELD
by the applicant to the
August 13, 2014 TAB meeting
TENTATIVE
8. TM-0103-14 - ROBINSON, JAMES & DONNA:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
9. WS-0572-14 – MILLER, THOMAS T.
APPROVED per staff “If Approved” conditions and,
STRIKE Public Works – Development Review condition:
ADD condition:
• Bond
extension for 3 years.
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to appeal the administrative denial of an off-site improvement bond extension
of time in conjunction with a residential subdivision in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the north side of Dancing Winds Place, 625
feet west of Southern Highlands Parkway within Enterprise. SB/rk/ml (For possible
action)
The original offsite bond was obtained in
March 2005 and extended six times. The
applicant has recently repurchased the last parcel owned by another
individual. The indication is the
applicant is not interested in developing the vacant lots at this time or in
the near future. They prefer not to have
neighbors at this time.
The offsites have
been constructed. The county cut list
for acceptance on a private road has not been completed. The TAB opinion is the applicant should be
given additional time for two reasons.
First, the applicant and his family are the only people using the
private road at this time. Second, is to
give the applicant additional time to find a solution other than extending the
bond. One possibility is to remap the
subdivision to a single lot.
10. WS-0599-14 – KB HOME LV CACTUS BERMUDA,
LLC:
APPROVE Waiver of Development Standards 1a for lots 30,
31, & 32;
APPROVE Waiver of Development Standards 1b not to exceed
36 lots;
ADD Current Planning
condition:
• Lots 30
& 31 to be single story homes;
APPROVE Design Review
Per staff "If Approved" conditions
Motions PASSED
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to reduce setbacks in conjunction with a single family residential development
on 21.9 acres in an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the
northwest corner of Cactus Avenue and Bermuda Road within
Enterprise. SS/al/ml (For possible action)
The purpose of this request is to allow for an
additional garage option to the proposed homes.
The standard product has a two or three car garage. This waiver would allow a three or four car
garage home. The addition of another
garage reduces side setback. The TAB is
reluctant to grant blanked waivers. The
applicant suggested the waivers restrictions and the TAB agreed with those
limits.
One item that was agreed to between the
developer and the neighbors was the single story homes on lots 30 and 31. However this was not included in earlier
approvals. The Design Review on this
application allowed the TAB to add the condition for single story homes on lots
30 and 31.
11. WS-0601-14 – SOUTHWEST REALTY HOLDINGS,
LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Increase the height of a freestanding sign; and
2) Permit a roof sign.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
comprehensive sign plan in conjunction with an automobile dealership on 6.5 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone and a C-2 (General Commercial)
(AE-60) Zone in the
12. ZC-0596-14 – HARRISON KEMP & JONES 401
APPROVE Zone Change;
DENY Design Review;
ADD Current Planning
condition:
• Provide
cross access to commercial properties to the west and north if compatible uses
are established.
Motion PASSED
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
retail center. Generally
located on the north side of Cactus Avenue, 340 feet east
of Valley View Boulevard within Enterprise (description on
file). SB/al/ml
(For possible action)
The zone change is appropriate for this
property. The property is surrounded by parcels
planned for neighborhood commercial. The
parcel to the west is on the corner of Cactus and Valley View. With the Cactus interchange completion the
Cactus/Valley View intersection is very desirable a commercial site. The TAB
opinion is cross access to the west and to the north is essential to the future
development this corner. Because the
inline building blocks the entire west property line, the design review was
denied. The suggestion was made to move
the building to the east property line will be examined by the applicant.
13. ZC-0597-14 – ROBINSON, JAMES & DONNA:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning
condition:
• Comply
with Mountains Edge Master Plan architectural color palette and lighting
standards.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development. Generally located on the
west side of
This is an out parcel and a good in fill
project. The applicant had agreed to use
the Mountains Edge landscape standards along the public roads. The TAB has constantly recommended the in
fill projects use Mountains Edge Master Plan architectural color palette and
lighting standards. This will help keep
a consistent look through the master plan area.
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
Commission
Chambers
Commission
Chambers
ADJOURNMENT:
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission
results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This
document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s
content is not altered. Additional
comments maybe added. Additional
comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those comments and
published or reproduced with the document.
The additional comments author’s affiliation with any government board,
organization or group must be clearly identified. This attribution statement must accompany any
distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.