Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC
or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes.
1. Items on the agenda may be taken out of
order.
2. The Town Advisory Board may combine two or
more agenda items for consideration.
3. The Town Advisory Board may remove an item
from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item at any time.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
·
The
county will begin taking applications for individuals to serve on the TAB/
·
Beginning
with the
·
On
GENERAL
BUSINESS: NONE
ZONING
AGENDA:
1. WS-0829-14 –
DENIED per staff if approved conditions
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
to allow the inclusion of the private street in calculating lot area.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a
zone change (NZC-0348-13) requiring per revised plans submitted on
Note: Harmony Homes was the original applicant
for NZC-0348-13 and TM-0139-13.
The TAB strongly recommends this application
be denied for the following:
·
The
lot sizes do not comply with Title 30 R-2 zone districts standards.
·
Net
lot size of 2800 sq. ft. where 3300 sq. ft. is required is not acceptable to
the TAB. 21 of 40 lots are undersized.
·
It
would be an undesirable precedent to allow the streets to be counted in net lot
size in the R-2 zone district.
·
The
developer has extensive experience in County, who has complied with Title 30
R-2 requirements on other projects
·
The
·
The
Harmony Homes failed to update the Tentative Map prior to the
·
In
August 2013, for Tentative Maps, the staff was only required make
recommendations based on the tentative map requirements. They were not required to comment on the
compliance with the zone district standards on the Tentative Map staff agenda
sheets.
·
The
Harmony Homes was advised by the staff there was a risk in filing a Tentative
Map prior to the
·
The
Storybrook is basing their project on a Tentative Map approved by the PC on
·
Due
diligence by the developer should have resolved any differences between
NZC-0348-13 and the Tentative Map prior to proceeding with project planning.
Based upon review of the PC,
·
The
TAB heard NZC-0348-13
·
The
TAB had objections to the 38 lot plot plan presented
·
Harmony
Home elected to hold the plan for revisions.
·
TAB
approved NZC-0348-13 per staff conditions and revised plans shown by the
Harmony Homes
·
Harmony
Homes submitted a revised plot plan with 34 lots
·
The
34 lot plot plan met all R-2 zone district standards
·
PC
approved NZC-0348-13 per staff conditions and no driveways on Agate
·
This
approval was based upon the 34 lot plot plan shown to the TAB
·
Tentative
map with 38 lots submitted to the County by Harmony Homes
·
Plot
design that did not comply with staff conditions on NZC-0348-13
·
Did
not comply with PC recommendations on NZC-0348-13
·
·
Plot
Plan with 34 lots was filed with the County for NZC-0348-13
·
PC
approved, on routine action, a 38 lot Tentative Map.
·
The
Tentative Map did not comply with the previous PC and
·
It
was the applicant’s responsibility to update their tentative map request prior
to the PC hearing.
Given the reasons above and the time line, The
TAB position is the
2. TM-0177-14 – TRIDENT DEVELOPMENT, INC., ET
AL:
APPROVED
per staff if approved
conditions
TENTATIVE
The Tentative map approval is dependent on
approval of WS-0817-14. See WS-0817-14
for the TAB comments.
3. VS-0818-14 – TRIDENT DEVELOPMENT, INC., ET
AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
and,
ADD a Public Works – Development Review condition:
Full asphalt width and gutter along
VACATE
4. VS-0827-14 – CANFAM HOLDINGS, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
5. WS-0817-14 – TRIDENT DEVELOPMENT, INC., ET
AL:
APPROVED Waivers of Development Standards 1, 2, & 3;
APPROVED Design Review;
Per staff if approved conditions
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Reduce the front setback;
2) Off-site improvements (sidewalk and
streetlights); and
3) Allow an over-length cul-de-sac.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
single family residential development on 7.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
The TAB recommendations are based upon several
factors:
·
The
proposed development meets Title 30 standards for lot size and density.
·
There
is little guidance in Title 30 for net lot size in this zone district.
·
The
wash through the proposed project is a significant factor impacting the project
design.
·
The
developer should be given some latitude in design due to the wash.
·
The
project is a good fit into the neighborhood.
·
If
an additional feature will cause a setback waiver, the developer will not offer
that feature.
6. DR-0821-14 –
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning condition:
• Design
Review as a Public Hearing for free standing sign.
DESIGN REVIEW for a distribution center
on 7.9 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay
District. Generally located on the north side of
7. UC-0833-14 – TIAMO SQUARE, LLC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning Condition:
· Establish perpetual
cross-access with property to north and south if compatible uses.
USE
PERMITS for the
following:
1) Vehicle (recreational and watercraft) sales;
and
2) Vehicle repair and service facility.
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a zone
change (ZC-1477-02) requiring all sides of buildings to be
finished to be consistent with the front of buildings.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
vehicle (motorcycle, recreational, and watercraft) sales and repair facility on
a portion of a 2.3 acre parcel in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the
This is an excellent project for the
neighborhood. The parcel is on the north
end of larger commercial area with undeveloped lots on both sides. The back of the building faces a water
authority facility and does not need to be similar to the front of the
building.
The TAB added a condition to establish cross
access with the properties to the north and south if the uses a
compatible. This will help improve
traffic flow between the businesses along the east side for Jones.
8. WS-0756-14 –
Waiver of Development Standards #1 has been WITHDRAWN by the applicant.
Denied
Waiver of Development
Standards #2;
Denied Design Review
WAIVERS
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
for the following:
1) Permit a roof sign where not allowed; and
2) Increase the area of a projecting sign.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
roof sign and a projecting sign in conjunction with a multiple family
residential planned unit development (PUD) on 3.0 acres in a C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
PREVIOUS
ACTION
Enterprise TAB
Nice sign, however it does not fit into the
neighborhood. The TAB has recommended
and
One TAB member suggested a monument sign is a
better fit for the neighborhood. The
monument sign would be more in line with the sign allowed for Maverick.
PUBLIC
COMMENTS NONE
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances
board/commission results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County
Records. This document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the
author’s content is not altered.
Additional comments maybe added.
Additional comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those
comments and published or reproduced with the document. The additional comments author’s affiliation
with any government board, organization or group must be clearly identified. This attribution statement must accompany any
distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.