Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC
or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text it
will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
REGULAR BUSINESS
1. Approve the Minutes for
the meeting held on February 11, 2015. APPROVED
2. Approve the Agenda with
any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
1. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order.
2. The Town Advisory Board may combine two or more agenda items
for consideration.
Companion items:
5. TM-0016-15 –
9. WS-0059-15 –
10. TM-0017-15 – D.R.
HORTON
13. ZC-0061-15 – D.R.
HORTON
11. TM-0019-15 - USA
14. ZC-0062-15 – USA
3. The Town Advisory Board may remove an item from the agenda or
delay discussion relating to an item at any time.
ANNOUNCEMENTS NONE
GENERAL BUSINESS:
Discuss a report on
the Consolidated Urban Land Use Policies. (For possible action)
· The following points were discussed by the TAB members and the
public:
· Concerns that homeowners are not well represented in the
development of the consolidated policies and Community Development Plans.
· Will the County staff seek input from the general public and
homeowners?
o
Probably not.
o
Stakeholder’s input will be through the working group.
o
Then public input through
TAB, PC and
· The individual town land use policies are being consolidated;
wording cleaned-up, redundant policies removed and are
being moved into the County land use element.
· The goals that unified policies are not there and need to be put
back in.
o
It is possible that in
this process, to put the goals back in, it would be necessary to go back and
look at the policies to make sure that they match the goals.
o
When the categories are
developed it is possible that goals and policies will need to reexamined.
o
When Title 30 is amended,
it will be necessary to examine all the elements to make sure that it is all
put together correctly and accomplishes the intended objective.
· There will be individual Community Development Plans for the
urban towns and policies that will be specific to those areas.
· The goals are not going away; same goals will be there but
cleaned-up.
o
Some current goals are
more similar to a vision statement than a goal.
o
The staff is working on
the goals and cleaning those up.
o
What is the time table
for integration of the goals with the policies?
Not answered.
· Must be sufficient distribution of information that the general
public can see and have an opportunity to comment.
· The residential estate polices are not adequate to help guide
large lot and RNP-1 development in Enterprise.
· ‘Mansion-type homes’ was removed and should be put back in, as
an example.
· How are public comments regarded and integrated?
Comments can be sent to GTB@clarkcountynv.gov.
The consolidated land use policies will be heard by the Planning
Commission on March 3, 2015.
The consolidated policies can be found at: Urban
Land Use Policies
ZONING AGENDA:
1. ZC-0028-15 – USA:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Public Works – Development Review bullet #4 to read:
· Right-of-way dedication to include 45 ft to back of curb for Bermuda
Rd and 55 feet to back of curb for Starr Ave.
ADD Public Works – Development Review conditions:
· No internal street lights;
· Full off-sites on Starr Ave, except street lights. Pull boxes and conduit to be installed;
· Street lights on Bermuda Rd to be fully shielded;
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family
residential development. Generally located on the
west side of Bermuda Road and the north side of Starr Avenue within
Enterprise (description on file).
ss/pb/ml
(For possible action) 03/04/15
PREVIOUS
ACTION
Enterprise TAB February 11, 2015: HELD to the February 25, 2015
TAB meeting per agreement with the applicant: (previously heard)
This project meets all the current Commissioner
requirements. It has 10,000 sq. ft., or
greater, lots adjacent to the RNP and smaller lots that all exceed 4000 sq.
ft.
There was considerable interest in this project which included a
neighborhood meeting with the developer.
The primary neighboring resident concerns were:
· Increased density adjacent to the RNP.
· Lighting within the project.
· Increasing the lot size along the western border.
· Lighting along Starr Ave.
The applicant requested Fairfield Ave. to not be dedicated.
The TAB requested, and the developer agreed, to the additional
conditions. Fairfield is vacated north
of Terrill Ave. The Terrill Ave.
vacation limits the right-of-way usefulness north of Starr and is not required
for access to the applicant’s project.
Adequate access and traffic flow can be maintained with the future
Placid St. dedication, a Ľ section line road.
The developer will use coach lighting to meet the internal
lighting requirement.
There was a resident request not to install the street lights
along Starr Ave. The TAB condition would
install all the other improvements on Starr Ave., including the conduit and
pull boxes installed for future street lights.
The applicant will examine the plot plan to determine if larger
lots along the western boundary are possible without decreasing any small lot
below 4,000 sq. ft.
2. CP-0065-15:
That the Enterprise Town Advisory Board hold a public hearing to
reconsider specific land use changes to the Enterprise Land Use Plan adopted on
October 23, 2014, and after taking appropriate testimony, forward a
recommendation to the Clark County Planning Commission for re-examination. (For
possible action) 03/03/15 PC
CP-0065-15
(
APPROVED Residential Suburban
(RS)
OP (Office Professional) to RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation -
up to 2 du/ac).
Generally located on
northwest corner of Ford Avenue and Edmond Street.
APNs 176-13-701-018, 019, & 020
Factors considered by the TAB:
· Property owner requested Residential Suburban.
· The location is not suitable for Office Professional.
· Residential land use is a more appropriate use in this location.
· The residential use would provide a buffer to the RNP-1 to the
north and west.
CP-0065-15
(
APPROVED Residential Low (RL)
RL (Residential Low — up to 3.5 du/ac) to BDRP (Business and Design/Research Park).
Generally located on the
northeast corner of Dean Martin Drive and Agate Avenue alignment.
Factors considered by the TAB:
· No nonresidential uses have been commenced in the last 10 years
in this neighborhood.
· This location is not suitable for intense commercial uses.
· Dean Martian Dr. will be reclassified as a collector road.
· This property has very poor access for non-residential uses (no
arterials within a ˝ mile).
· Abutting properties are planned for residential use.
· The two operations, one commercial and one nonprofit, in the
area are long established and blend into the neighborhood.
· Significant neighborhood opposition.
· Current residents should have a reasonable confidence level that
they will not have incompatible uses next to them.
· The applicant has an ROI for C-2 for approximately six years
with no progress on the proposed project.
CP-0065-15
(
APPROVED Residential Low (RL)
OL (
Generally located on the
southwest corner of Jones Boulevard and Erie Avenue.
Factors considered by the TAB:
· The property owner has recently purchased the property from the
· There was significant neighborhood opposition.
o
Neighbors
use the open land for recreation.
o
Cited
the lack of parks in the area.
o
Additional
load on overcrowded schools.
o
Proposed
density too high for the area.
· How the land will be developed given the 12 degree or greater
slope on the parcel.
· Will the parcel be annexed into Southern Highlands Master Plan?
o
For
land annexed into Southern Highlands Master Plan, Title 29 will apply.
o
For
land developed as an outparcel, Title 30 will apply
and the Hillside & Foothills Development will be in effect for slopes
greater than 12 degrees.
The TAB opinion is Residential Low is appropriate for this area
given the slope across the property.
3. UC-1988-96 (ET-0006-15) – GINGELL,
DIRK A:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Current Planning bullet #1 to read:
·
Until
April 30, 2025 to review.
USE
PERMIT FOURTH EXTENSION OF TIME to
review up to 15 exotic animals (tigers and leopards) on 1.1 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located on the
north side of Torino Avenue, 130 feet east of Arville Street within Enterprise. SB/co/ml (For possible
action)
03/04/15
The applicant has an excellent record maintaining the animals. The staff recommended a 5 year review. The applicant requested a 10 year
review. Given the past history on the
property The TAB opinion is a 10 year review is appropriate.
4. DR-0056-15 – D.R. HORTON, INC:
APPROVED per staff
conditions
DESIGN
REVIEW for building orientation
of a proposed single family residence on 0.6 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the west side of Gilespie
Street, 330 feet south of Windmill Lane within Enterprise. SS/mk/ml
(For possible action) 03/17/15 PC
5. TM-0016-15 –
APPROVED per staff
conditions 4-1 (AS nay)
TENTATIVE
This project is an addition to Coldwater Crossing subdivision
with similar design standards. One
objection was due to lot sizes below 4,000 sq. ft.
6. UC-0043-15 – RMS, INC:
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Current Planning bullet #1
to read:
·
Provide for future cross-access to the property to the west;
ADD Current Planning
conditions:
· Hours of
operation limited to
USE
PERMIT for a vehicle (automobile)
wash.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to reduce the setback for a vehicle
(automobile) wash facility from a residential use.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a vehicle (automobile)
wash facility on 1.3 acres in an H-2 (General Highway Frontage) Zone in the
MUD-3 Overlay District. Generally located on the
north side of
The TAB is concerned that cross access be established with the
property to the west. However, the
property owner to the west does not want to allow cross access. The TAB wants to ensure the applicant will
establish cross access if the other party will agree. This would be beneficial to both parties.
The condition for operating hours was added because the staff
write up indicated
7. UC-0066-15 – SHER-INN, LLC:
APPROVED per staff
conditions
USE PERMIT for a communication tower.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a communication tower
and associated ground equipment on 2.9 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone. Generally located on the south side of
8. VS-0047-15 – RYANIK
APPROVED per staff
conditions
VACATE
9. WS-0059-15 –
APPROVED per staff conditions and,
CHANGE Current Planning bullet #2
to read:
·
Streetlights and landscaping adjacent to
ADD Current Planning
condition:
·
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for
increased wall height for a single family residential development.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family
residential development on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally located on the east side of
One objection was due to lot sizes below 4,000 sq. ft.
This project is an addition to Coldwater Crossing
subdivision. The design standards for
Coldwater Crossing will be maintained in the area covered by this
application.
Current Planning bullet #2 was written with
The TAB has consistently added design conditions to ensure
Mountain’s Edge out parcels will blend into community.
10. TM-0017-15 – D.R. HORTON:
APPROVED per staff
conditions
TENTATIVE
11. TM-0019-15 -
APPROVED per staff
conditions
TENTATIVE
12. WS-0836-14 – FOREFRONT DEVELOPMENT, LLC:
APPROVED per staff
conditions
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
reduce setbacks from single family residential development.
WAIVER OF
CONDITIONS of a zone change
(NZC-0770-12) requiring landscaping per Figure 30.64-12 along the south
property line.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a redesign of a
previously approved apartment complex on 4.7 acres in an R-3 (Multiple Family
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the south side of
13. ZC-0061-15 – D.R. HORTON:
APPROVE per staff conditions and,
ADD Public Works –
Development Review conditions:
·
·
All pole-mounted lighting to be fully shielded including street
lights along
·
La
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to
increase the length of a cul-de-sac.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family
residential development. Generally located on the
northwest corner of
A number of residents were concerned with this project. Some confusion results from the large
The applicant has designed a project that meets all the R-D zone
district requirements and will be an excellent buffer to the adjacent RNP-1.
The TAB has consistently recommended the use of coach lighting
within subdivisions adjacent to the RNP-1 overlay. This is reflected in the TAB condition for no
street lights in the project interior.
All pole-mounted street lighting should be fully shielded to cut
down on light pollution.
The area residents requested La Cienega
be constructed to rural standards. The
TAB has consistently recommended local roads leading into the RNP-1 overlay be
built to rural standards as a traffic mitigation measure.
14. ZC-0062-15 –
APPROVED per staff
conditions
WAIVER
OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for an
over length cul-de-sac.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family
residential development. Generally located on the
north side of
GENERAL BUSINESS:
Discuss the future
of the Enterprise TAB Sub-committee on RNP Traffic Mitigation (For possible
action)
APPROVED
· The traffic sub-committee will continue as a TAB sub-committee.
· The sub-committee has been renamed to Enterprise Traffic
Sub-committee to reflect the expanded scope of the sub-committee.
· The Traffic Sub-committee will meet on a quarterly basis.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A citizen requested a traffic light be installed at
Note: Cactus
from
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in this
document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be
freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not
altered. Additional comments maybe added. Additional comments must be clearly
attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the
document. The additional comments
author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be
clearly identified. This attribution
statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.