Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
ANNOUNCMENTS
1.
The
The class starts on Sept. 21 and will meet from
Applications are due by
To apply for the Neighborhood College:
Obtain an application from the Organizational Development Center located on the
first floor of the Clark County Government Center at 500 S. Grand Central
Parkway, or;
Complete an application online via this Web link, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/FNVTG96,
or;
Download
the application, then fax, mail or email the completed application to
Tyrone Thompson at fax: (702) 455-3211, email: tyt@clarkcountynv.gov, or mail to:
Clark County Organizational Development Center
500 S. Grand Central Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89155
2. The TAB will begin taking applications
for primary and alternate representatives to the Clark County Community
Development Advisory committee (CDAC) for the County's Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program. Submissions
are accepted until
3.
Neighborhood
Meeting:
To discuss a proposed non-conforming zone change request from R-E to R-2 to
allow for 72 unit single family residential project at Fort Apache Road and Gomer Road.
4. Neighborhood Meeting:
To discuss a proposed non-conforming zone change request from R-E to R-2 at the
northwest corner of Rainbow Boulevard and Landberg
Avenue and vacation of Rosanna Street.
July 30,
5. Rocky Brandonisio has been appointed to the TAB.
ZONING AGENDA:
1.
DR-0408-15 – ZAK MAK, LLC, ET AL:
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family residential development on 37.5 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the
east and west sides of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
HELD
by the applicant to
2. TM-0122-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
HELD
by the applicant to
3. VS-0409-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
VACATE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
HELD
by the applicant to
4. UC-0404-15
– HAFEN I, LLC:
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) allow a
perimeter wall (CMU wall) on a vacant property; and 2) allow an 8 foot
high wall on 0.8 acres in the undeveloped R-E zoned portion of a parcel.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
landscaping and screening requirements; 2) reduced setback from property
line (wall); 3) reduced setback from the right-of-way for access gates; 4)
full off-site improvements; and 5) non-standard improvements
within a right-of-way (
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following 1) outside storage in
the M-1 zoned portion of the parcel; and 2)
a CMU screen block wall along the property lines on 1.8 acres in an M-1 (Light
Manufacturing) Zone, an H-2 (General Highway Frontage) Zone, and R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District. Generally located on the
southeast corner of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise
TAB
APPROVE per
staff “if approved” conditions
The TAB opinion is this parcel is suitable for the
applicant’s intended purpose. The parcel should be developed consistent with
the landscaping and off-sites on other parcels along
This parcel has three different zone districts that
should be updated into a single zone district.
The applicant will have to file for a non-conforming zone change to
match their intended use across the entire parcel. Part of the property is current zoned M-1and
the TAB has no objections to that area being used for outside storage while the
non-conforming zone change is processed.
The use of an 8 ft. wall is appropriate for the area.
Until the final plans for
The applicant presented a revised plan which showed a
landscape area along
5. DR-0399-15
– BUREAU OF
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) public park
(Mountain’s Edge Park Adult Baseball Fields) with ancillary uses, amenities,
structures, and facilities; and 2)
signage on an approximate 25.0 acre portion of a 225.0 acre site in a P-F
(Public Facility) Zone. Generally located on the south side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
This is an excellent addition to
The TAB has several concerns:
·
The provided parking
may not be adequate if a large event in the current park section and a baseball
tournament takes place at the same time.
·
Field design that
can be easily be converted for little league teams.
·
How the operating
hours will affect the abutting residential.
·
How the ball park
lighting will affect the abutting residential.
The TAB opinion is the lighting review should be a public
hearing because of the effects on the residential areas to the north and east.
APPROVE per
staff conditions and,
CHANGE
Current Planning bullet #2 to read:
·
Design review as a public hearing with more
detailed plans, including photometric values and details on lighting fixtures
for all on-site lighting.
6. UC-0339-15 – ROBERT
SCOTT CARL LIVING TRUST, ET AL:
AMENDED HOLDOVER USE
PERMITS for the following: 1)
increase the area of an accessory building; 2) allow an accessory
building not architecturally compatible with the principal building; and 3)
waive applicable design standards per Table 30.56-2A in conjunction with an
existing single family residence on 1.0
acre in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the
west side of
APPROVE per
staff conditions and,
ADD a
Current Planning condition:
·
Plant trees every 20 feet along the south side of the proposed
building.
One resident objected to the application with the
following comments.
·
This proposed
accessory structure is %200 the size of the primary residential structure.
·
It is a %400 increase
above allowed code standard of %50 of the size of the primary residential
structure.
·
We are seeing more
and more abuses of the privilege of these accessory structures in RNPs.
·
Uses that the
privileges of the RNP were never meant to include.
·
More detailed
guidelines are needed beyond what is now available in Title 30.
·
It was requested
that the TAB include on a future agenda a discussion item on accessory
structures.
The TAB felt that given the size of this building, the
applicant should provide landscaping along
7. UC-0416-15 – KALE, HELEN A.:
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) allow an accessory structure (metal
garage) not architecturally compatible with the principal structure; and 2)
modified design standards in conjunction with an existing single family
residence on 0.7 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I)
Zone. Generally
located on the west side of
DENY per
staff recommendation
The TAB agrees with the staff opinion that the accessory
structure is not compatible with the area.
The TAB considered the following:
·
The design of the
building design is better suited to an industrial area.
·
The applicant was
not willing to position the structure to accommodate a landscaping buffer.
·
The applicant stated
his neighbors planned landscaping that would hide the building.
·
Painting the
structure would not help its compatibility with the neighborhood.
·
The other building
examples in the area cited by the applicant do not appear adjacent or abutting
their property.
·
This is a relatively
new neighborhood where the proposed accessory structure design in not
prevalent.
8. UC-0433-15 – CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF
USE PERMIT for modified
residential development standards in conjunction with a single family
development on portions of approximately 125.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) P-C
(Planned Community Overlay District) Zone and an R-3 (Multiple Family
Residential) P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Rhodes Ranch
Master Planned Community. Generally located on the east side of
APPROVE per
staff conditions
9. UC-0455-14 (WC-0052-15) –
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a use permit requiring drainage
study and compliance in conjunction with an existing single family residence on
1.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates residential) Zone. Generally located on the
east side of
APPROVE per
staff conditions
10. WS-0420-15 – PAUL, DANIEL &
SHERI-LYN:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the
following: 1) allow alternative
screening (decorative block wall) in the front yard; 2) allow a swimming
pool in the front yard; and 3) reduced rear setbacks in conjunction with
a proposed single family residence on 0.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the south side of
APPROVE per
staff conditions
11. WS-0434-15 – GOLIN, LINDA:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to increase wall
height in conjunction with a single family residence on 0.3 acres in an
R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of
APPROVE per
staff conditions per plans on file with county.
The Waiver of Development Standards as written would
allow the applicant to build an 8 ft. wall on the entire property. The TAB added the wall must comply with the
plans submitted to the county which shows the actual increase in wall heights.
12. DR-0437-15 – OBER FAMILY
INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL:
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed hotel with kitchens in rooms on a portion of 3.2 acres in an H-1
(Limited Resort and Apartment) Zone in the MUD-1 Overlay District. Generally located on the
north side of
DENY due to
denial of vacation of Moberly – re: VS-0439-15
The design presented required the vacation of
The TAB is concerned that established business adjacent
to the property would be harmed by the vacation of
The applicant plans showed an undeveloped portion of the
property that can be used to relocate the building and create enough parking to
meet code requirements.
Established public right-of-way should not be given away. Especially, when the
applicant has land available to build the project without the vacation. See VS-0439-15 for the TAB discussion on
13. VS-0323-13 (ET-0049-15) –
VACATE
APPROVE per
staff conditions
14. TM-0125-15 – ROOHANI KHUSROW FAMILY
TRUST; ET AL:
TENTATIVE
APPROVE per
staff conditions
15. VS-0415-15 - ROOHANI KHUSROW FAMILY
TRUST; ET AL:
VACATE
APPROVE per
staff conditions
16. VS-0439-15 - OBER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL:
VACATE
APPROVE
DENY
vacation of Moberly
The
TAB recommends approval for the 5 ft. vacation along
The
TAB examined the following concerning the
·
The applicant contends
·
Moberly is a dedicated public right-of-way.
·
Area residents are strongly against the
vacation of
·
·
South bound traffic can access
o
To continue southbound it is necessary to go
east on Moberly then north or south on Giles then west back to
o
If Moberly is vacated south bound traffic will
have to go to
o
The U-turn at
·
Many Enterprise residents use the east/west
streets between Las Vegas Blvd and Giles St. as an alternate route to access
businesses on the east side of Las Vegas Blvd.
·
The applicant is using the vacate portion of
·
The building placement is also requires the
vacation of
·
A portion of the site was shown as a future
pad site.
·
The applicant has sufficient land available to
relocate the building and parking.
·
The vacation of
·
Future traffic increases on
The
TAB recommends
17. WS-0414-15 – ROOHANI KHUSROW FAMILY
TRUST; ET AL:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce front setback.
WAIVERS OF CONDITIONS of a zone change (NZC-0568-13)
requiring the following: 1) per
revised plans presented at the 08/06/14 Board of County Commissioners’ meeting;
2) R-D zoning for portion depicting
Lot 1 through 11 with a density of 3 dwelling units per acre; 3) R-1 zoning for portion depicting
Lots 12 through 36 with a density of 5 dwelling units per acre; 4) mix of 1 and 2 story homes with 2
story homes interior to the development; and 5) full off-site improvements on Westwind
Road.
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following: 1) a single family residential development; and 2) increase finished grade for a
proposed residential development on 7.5 acres
in an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone and an R-1 (Single Family
Residential) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay District. Generally located on the
northwest corner
APPROVE
Waiver of Development Standards;
APPROVE
Waivers of Conditions 1, 2, 3, & 4;
DENY Waiver
of Conditions 5;
APPROVE
Design Review 1 & 2;
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Provide a pathway along Lindell
and Agate;
Per staff
"if approved" conditions
The
developer has presented an excellent project for the area. The waivers of conditions 1 thru 4 are
necessary to accommodate the current project which is significantly different
for the original plans.
The
TAB recommends the full off-sites be developed along Westwind. The Westwind west
side is already developed. In addition, Westwind adjacent to the project is not in or next to a RNP
that could justify rural road standards.
The
TAB has requested an examination of the rural road standards to meet the
current neighborhood needs. One of those
needs is a walking pathway adjacent to the roadway. To date this has not been acted upon by the
County. The TAB added a condition for a
pathway along
18. WS-0423-15 – STORYBOOK-DURANGO, LLC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to reduce setbacks
for proposed single family residences.
DESIGN REVIEW for 2
single family residences within a residential subdivision on 0.2 acres in an R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located on the
northwest corner of
APPROVE per
staff conditions