Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
ANNOUNCMENTS
1.
The
Clark County Water Reclamation District will host an open house on
2.
The next TAB meeting will be on Thursday,
November 12.
3.
A
zoning item, WS-0321-13 (ET-0069-15)
– Ryanik Las Vegas Holding, LLC, that was on the
September 30 and October 14 TAB agendas - and for which the applicant did not
appear at either of those meetings - was DENIED at the October 21 Zoning Commission
meeting and will not return to the TAB.
ZONING AGENDA:
1. DR-0663-15 – r&g living trust, et al:
DESIGN REVIEW for a
single family residential development on
1.3 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone. Generally located on the
north side of
DENY
The
TAB considered the following for this application:
·
The zone change was approved in 2004.
·
All other applications have expired.
·
Staff confirmed this is a new Design Review.
·
Applicant’s representative stated:
o
This Design Review meets all Title-30
standards and
o
Not much has changed since the 2004
applications.
o
This application is simply a reinstatement of
an expired application.
·
Since 2004 there has been significant land use
and policy changes effecting this area.
·
The home designs are appropriate for the area.
·
Fenestrations are provided on all sides of the
proposed homes.
·
Additional fenestrations are to be provided on
homes facing some roads.
·
The plot layout did not provide 10,000 sq. ft.
lots next to the RNP-1.
·
Pole mounted lighting should be fully shielded
including street lights.
·
Develop
The
TAB recommendation is to deny the Design Review due to lot size adjacent to the
RNP-1. The TAB opinion is the current
If
this application is approved a condition should be added to fully shield all
pole mounted lighting including the street lights.
2. TM-0180-15 - r&g living trust, et al:
TENTATIVE
DENY
The
TAB recommended the Design Review be denied due to not meeting the 10,000 sq.
foot lot size requirement next to the RNP-1.
The denial recommendation on DR-0663-15 is the reason for the Tentative
Map denial.
3. TM-0183-15 - prestige family group:
TENTATIVE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
4. UC-0654-15 – 7729 RAINBOW, LLC:
USE PERMIT to allow on-premises consumption of alcohol
(service bar) in conjunction with a proposed restaurant (Korean BBQ) within an
existing shopping center on a portion of 1.7 acres in a C-1 (Local Business)
Zone. Generally
located on the west side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
The
restaurant seating capacity could not be determined by the TAB. The 5000 sq. ft. being leased indicates the
capacity could be around 100 patrons. The staff recommended cross access and parking agreement with the
property to the south. The cross
access requirement for the southern property is in place from previously
approved applications. The requirement to provide cross access to the south
elicited two opinions on the TAB.
The
first opinion consisted of the following:
·
The cross access requirement may not be
possible due to grade differences.
·
There is a 3 ft. grade difference between the
two properties which decreases toward
·
The retaining wall would have to be breached
to create the cross access.
·
Parking slots north and south would be lost
creating the cross access.
·
The southern parcel is fully leased with
little incentive for management to provide cross access.
The
second opinion consisted of the following:
·
The TAB has previously discussed this area
along Rainbow on other applications for cross access.
·
Cross access is necessary for better traffic
flow between the two properties.
·
The overall parking availability would be
better by having access spaces on both properties.
·
The northern parcel has poor traffic flow
which is a determent to the business in that location.
·
Customers on the northern parcel will have
access to the southern business and vice-versa without re-entering
The
TAB recommended the service bar be approved with the staff condition for cross
access and parking agreement requirements on a split vote.
5. UC-0662-15 –
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) modify
residential development standards; and 2) allow a second kitchen.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to reduce the setback
from a right-of-way in conjunction with an addition to an existing single
family residence on 0.3 acres in an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential)
P-C (Planned Community Overlay District) Zone in the Mountain’s Edge Master Planned Community. Generally located 180 feet
east of
APPROVE
per staff “if approved” conditions
The
staff recommended denial of this application.
The TAB considered the following:
·
The application is within a master planned
community.
·
The applicant had detailed plans which clearly
showed the addition position on the property.
·
The applicant clearly explained how other
features on the property limit the addition’s placement.
·
The master HOA has approved the addition, Master HOA is also the sub-HOA for this neighborhood.
·
HOA approval for this type of addition is
difficult to obtain.
While
the TAB is reluctantly approved setback reduction on previously granted setback
reductions, the master HOA approval is a significant factor in this application. The TAB recommended approval based upon the
Master HOA approval and their determination this project is acceptable for the
neighborhood.
6. VS-0646-15 – paher, dorothy 1995 revocable trust, et al:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
7. VS-0664-15 – r&g living trust, et al:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
8. VS-0671-15 - CC AVIATION/MAJESTIC RUNWAY
PTNRS V, ET AL:
VACATE
Send
forward with no recommendation pending resolution of legal claims.
During
public comment a trust representative related that there is an agreement
between the trust and the County to recover property covered by this
application. The legal question is
beyond the TAB expertise and staff members present. The issues between the applicant and the
trust should be resolved by the county attorneys before the PC hearing.
9. VS-0673-15 – brideau, benoit, et al:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
10. VS-0684-15 – prestige family group:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
11. WS-0677-15 –
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to allow a roof
sign.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
roof sign in conjunction with an existing truck stop on 13.0 acres in an M-D
(Designed Manufacturing) (AE-65) Zone and an H-2 (General Highway Frontage)
(AE-65) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District.
Generally located on the northeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
12. TM-0178-15 - Eclipse holding group, llc:
TENTATIVE
APPROVE
per staff "if approved" conditions for Tentative Map presented to the
TAB on
ADD
Current Planning "if approved" condition:
·
A new tentative map required as a public
hearing for significant changes;
The
staff recommended the Tentative Map be denied due to recommended denial of
WS-0652-15. The TAB recommended
approval of WS-0652-15 with conditions.
If
a significant change to plans requires a new tentative map, the new tentative
map should be reviewed in a public hearing along with the new plot plan.
13. VS-0653-15 – Eclipse holding group, llc:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
14. WS-0652-15 – ECLIPSE HOLDING GROUP,
LLC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to increase the length of a dead-end street (cul-de-sac) with
a County approved turnaround.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed single family subdivision on 5.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density
Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the northeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff "if approved" conditions and,
ADD
Current Planning conditions:
·
Design Review approved per plans shown to
the TAB on
·
Design Review as a public hearing for significant
changes to plans presented;
ADD
Public Works – Development Review conditions:
·
All pole mounted lighting to be fully
shielded including street lights;
·
CHANGE
Public Works – Development Review condition #3 to read:
·
Full off-site improvements except Camero;
The
staff had recommended the design review be denied.
This
project has larger lots (6300 + sq. ft. usable) with very attractive home
designs. It will fit well into the
neighborhood.
The
applicant presented a detailed Public Works approved plan for the Buffalo/Camero intersection.
This plan showed how the water would be taken from the west under
Any
pole mounted lighting including street lighting should be fully shielded to
reduce the fugitive light and visible light sources in the RNP-1 and
established neighborhoods.
If
there are significant changes to the plans, a new design review as a public
hearing should be required.
15. WS-0659-15 – LH VENTURES, LLC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for reduced street
intersection off-set.
DESIGN REVIEW for
subdivision access in conjunction with a previously approved single family
residential development on 10.1 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone. Generally
located on the west side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
16. WS-0667-15 – PONDEROSA PLASTERING,
LLC:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
landscaping; and 2) off-site improvements (including curb, gutter,
sidewalk, streetlights, and partial paving).
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed outside storage yard and an office building on a portion of 2.2 acres
in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone. Generally located on the southeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions and,
CHANGE
Public Works – Development Review bullet #2 to read:
·
Full off-site improvements along
Excellent
use next to the UPRR tracks that will help buffer the residences to the west.
Public
Works has indicated that a bridge will be built across the UPRR track at
The
TAB recommends off-sites be built on
17. WS-0678-15 – DIAMOND PLACID, LLC:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
landscaping requirements; 2) cross-access requirements; 3)
reduced side setback; and 4) reduced trash enclosure setback
requirements.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed parking lot on 2.3 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) Zone and
an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) (AE-60) Zone.
Generally located on the west side of
DENY
A
site inspection on
·
A temporary chain-link fence is in place with no
screening.
·
No installed landscaping.
·
Prepared parking surface.
·
30 to 40 parked
·
Security guard.
The
TAB considered the following:
·
Two previous closed CCPRO complaints form 2014
for parking lot uses without a permit.
·
A complaint filed by a neighbor in October
2015. No reference to this complaint in
the staff agenda sheets.
·
The applicant’s representative stated they are
attempting to install the landscaping required by previous approvals.
·
The landscaping is several months away.
·
Current parking lot setup does not buffer the
adjacent residential use.
·
Buffering for the residential property has
been required since August 2010 zone change approval.
·
Parking use was prior to the use permit being
obtained.
·
How long is temporary? No answer.
Given
the repeat operations without a use permit and lack of buffering for adjacent
residential, the TAB recommends that application be denied.
If
the parking use is allowed, it should not begin until the buffering is
completed. As a temporary use, a review
period or a limit time limit should be placed on the application.
18. DR-0408-15 – ZAK MAK, LLC, ET AL:
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family residential development on 37.5 acres in an
R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the
east and west sides of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Planning Commission
No
action. This application was held to no
stated date at the
19. TM-0122-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Planning Commission
No
action. This application was held to no
stated date at the
20. VS-0409-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
VACATE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
Planning Commission
No
action. This application was held to no
stated date at the
GENERAL BUSINESS:
1. TAB
discuss, take public input, and approve next funding year budget requests. (For
possible action)
Submit items
1 through 16:
1.
Begin
construction on the intersection at
2.
Connect
3.
Complete
the
4.
Connect
5.
Begin
construction of
6.
Begin
construction of Jones built-out to 4 lanes between
7.
8.
Review
and rework the drainage on
9.
10. Fund one neighborhood park in Park District
4 at Cactus and Torrey Pines, Le Baron and Rainbow,
Pyle and Jones, or Pyle and Lindell.
11. Community pool
12. Continued Mountain’s Edge regional park
expansion
13. Four-way stop at
14. Park near
15. Traffic signal at
16. Traffic light at Torrey
Pines and Windmill
2. TAB
select third member for the Enterprise TAB Sub-Committee on Traffic Mitigation
in the RNP. (For possible action)
Approve J D
Allen as a member of the Sub-Committee
3. TAB receive update and discuss the Community Plan Work
Group. (For possible action)
Continue to
the
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
No
discussion, action, or vote may be taken upon a matter raised under this item
of the agenda until the matter itself has been specifically included on a
future agenda. Comments will be limited to three minutes. Please step to the
front of the room to address the Board, clearly state your name and address and
please spell your last name for the record. If
any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a presentation this will
be done by the Chair or the Board by majority vote.
Place on the agenda for general
business at the November 12 TAB meeting a discussion on increasing the number of members on the traffic committee.
(for possible action)