Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
ANNOUNCMENTS
1.
The
Clark County Water Reclamation District will host an open house on
ZONING AGENDA:
1. UC-0595-15 – SOUTHERN
USE PERMIT for a proposed school.
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
increased building height; 2) alternative landscaping; and 3)
off-site improvements (partial paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
streetlights).
WAIVER OF
CONDITIONS of a use permit
(UC-0078-15) requiring per revised plans dated
DESIGN REVIEW for a proposed school on a portion of
10.0 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone and an H-2 (General
Highway Frontage) Zone in the MUD-3 Overlay District. Generally located on the
south side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
Enterprise TAB
APPROVE
Use Permit
APPROVE
Waiver of Development Standards #1
Waivers
of Development Standards #2 & #3 are no longer needed
APPROVE Waiver of Conditions of a use permit
(UC-0078-15) requiring per revised plans dated
APPROVE
Design Review
Public
Works – Development Review bullets #3 & #4 are no longer needed;
ADD Current Planning conditions:
· Design
Review as a public hearing for lighting and signage;
· Execute
agreements for shared parking and cross access with APNs
176-23-501-019 & 020;
· Coordinate
off-hours events with the adjacent church or other uses;
ADD Public Works - Development Review conditions:
·
Right-of-way dedication to include
· Waive off-site improvements on
· Execute
a restrictive covenant agreement (deed restriction)
Per
Staff conditions
Note: This property does not
front on
This an excellent location for the school. The plan presented is better than the
previous reviewed plan. It offers more
separation from the RNP to the north.
The
TAB considered the following:
·
The school population is 1000 students and
plus staff.
·
Traffic is concentrated during drop-off,
pick-up, and special events.
·
Traffic is the primary neighborhood concern.
·
The student drop-off point was moved further
south shortening the possible queue length.
·
Was the queuing analysis updated for the
reduced queue distance? This Information
was not available.
·
How many cars can be handled in an hour with
the current queuing plan? Information
not available.
·
Parking and access is to be shared between the
school and the church.
·
No overflow parking is currently available in
the area.
·
Pebble Rd. will be developed to rural standards
per a previously approved application.
·
Pebble Rd. is the only access to two intense
uses.
·
An alternate access route for emergency
equipment would provide a prudent safety factor.
·
Applicant does see the need for
·
The
·
Public Works has not provided any
justification for the elimination of the Raven alignment in this area.
·
The elimination of
The
TAB recommended approval of this project with several additional
conditions. No information was presented
for lighting and signage; the TAB requested a design review as a public hearing
for lighting and signage.
The
church and school should have perpetual agreements for cross access and
parking. With no other location for
overflow parking provided, shared parking is a must. The school and church should coordinate
activities outside their normal operating hours. The total available parking is not sufficient
to accommodate a large, simultaneous events by both
organizations.
The
TAB recommends the
·
Raven Ave. is necessary for the future
development of the
·
Raven Ave. will provide a wider buffer to an
unknown use on the
·
Raven Ave., when fully dedicated, will provide
an alternate route for emergency vehicles if
·
Two of the three north/south roads/alignments
between Torrey Pines Dr. and the UPRR have been
eliminated or 'cul-de-sacked' short of the
·
Area access from Blue Diamond is limited to
the area beyond the touchdown point about 300 ft. east of Torrey
Pines Dr.
2. UC-0708-15 – RADMAN 2, LLC:
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) allow an
outside dining and drinking area in conjunction with an on-premises consumption
of alcohol (tavern) establishment; and 2) reduce the separation for an
outside dining area from a residential use.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to allow an
alternative exterior color for a building that consists of a vivid hue.
DESIGN
REVIEW for an outside dining area and façade renovation in conjunction
with an existing tavern on 1.1 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the
MUD-3 Overlay District. Generally located on the south side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
ADD
Current Planning conditions;
·
Review of outside dining in one year;
·
Design Review as a public hearing for
lighting;
The TAB is concerned with the following:
·
The outside dining
area will be a 24/7 use.
·
The outside dining
area will have music and large screen TVs.
o
May require a
Special Use Permit for live entertainment.
o
The applicant will
have to abide by the residential day/night maximum sound levels.
o
The residential
day/night maximum sound level may be difficult for the applicant to meet.
·
No parking reduction
with the added outside dining area.
·
Lighting was not
addressed in the Design Review.
·
The façade with
fluorescent light, faces the
The primary TAB concern is the noise generated by the
outside dinning. The staff agenda sheet
did not indicate the outside dinning would be 24/7 with amplified sound and
large screen TVs. The amplified sound
will require a separate use permit for live entertainment that was not included
in this application.
Rather than restrict the outside dining areas the TAB
recommend a 1-year review for the outside dining to determine the effects on
the adjacent residential neighborhood.
The TAB also recommends a Design Review as a public
hearing for lighting due to the close proximity of residential.
3. VS-0690-15 –
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
4. VS-0702-15 – southern
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
5. WS-0706-15 – TBD PARTNERSHIP, LLC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to allow an existing
wall sign to face residential development.
DESIGN REVIEW for
an existing wall sign in conjunction
with an automobile repair facility (Tire Works) within an existing shopping
center on 6.6 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the MUD-4
Overlay District. Generally
located on the northeast corner of
APPROVE
with requirement that the sign remain in its current location and not be
illuminated
The TAB considered the following:
·
The applicant’s
desire to reinstate the same conditions as the original application.
·
The applicant was
resistant to the sign being moved to the south wall because the wall is not
high enough.
·
The required
one-year review was not accomplished.
·
There were three
CCPRO cases concerning the illuminated sign.
·
The most effected
resident described how his household was negatively affected by the illuminated
sign.
·
The sign has been a
problem since it was installed as residents have presented their objections in
past TAB hearings.
The TAB recommendation is to keep the sign in its current
location without illumination. This
would eliminate the sign’s effect on the adjacent residential and require no
further action by the applicant. If the
sign was placed on the south wall and illuminated, it would only partially
solve the problem for the adjacent residents.
Given the history of not following the application conditions and CCPRO
actions, the TAB believes no illumination is the best solution.
Note: The TAB did not include the Staff conditions in the
application approval. The staff
conditions offered a different solution than recommended by the TAB.
6. UC-0484-13 (AR-0145-15) – glp capital, lp:
USE PERMITS FIRST APPLICATION FOR REVIEW for the following: 1) exotic animals (wolf dog/hybrids);
and 2) allow accessory agricultural
large animals (2 horses).
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to allow alternative
screening and buffering standards.
DESIGN REVIEW for an exotic animals (wolf dogs/hybrids)
facility in conjunction with a proposed single family residence on a portion of
4.1 acres in an R-T (Manufactured Home Residential) Zone. Generally located on the
east side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
7. DR-0704-15 – GB PARTNERS, LLC:
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following: 1) a retail/restaurant building with drive-thru; and 2) a retail/office building within a
partially developed shopping center on 1.2 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located on the south side of
APPROVE
and,
ADD
Current Planning conditions:
·
Design Review as a public hearing for
lighting and signage;
·
Execute agreements for shared parking and
cross access with adjacent commercial uses;
·
Drive aisle to be on south side of building;
·
Move the squawk box and menu board to the
south-west corner of the retail/restaurant building with drive-through;
Per
staff conditions
This project is a good fit for the area and is a better
solution that previously proposed uses.
The TAB considered the following:
·
The planned location
for the menu board and squawk-box.
·
Planned condos to
the east.
·
Condo common area to
the south.
·
Applicant’s
statement that a fast food operation would be limited to county day light
hours.
·
Squawk-box queue
would block some planned parking.
·
Parking was
calculated on entire site not just the applicant’s property.
·
Lighting and signage
was not included in the Design Review presented.
The TAB recommended 4 conditions be added to the staff
conditions.
First, a Design Review as a public hearing for lighting
and signage as this information was not presented to the TAB.
Second, agreements for cross access and shared parking be put in place with the adjacent commercial uses. The parking is calculated on the entire
site.
Third, remove the parking slots on the south side of the
“retail/restaurant building with drive-thru” and convert this area to a drive
aisle.
Fourth, move the squawk-box and menu board to the
southwest corner of the “retail/restaurant building with drive-thru”. Moving the squawk-box will help shield the
proposed condos to the east from additional noise. The TAB expects fast food businesses to be a
24/7 operations in most cases. The
drive–up window is usually the only part of the fast food restaurant open for
late night operations. This is a safety
measure
GENERAL BUSINESS:
1. TAB receive update and discuss the Community Plan Work Group. (For possible action)
The TAB was given the current proposed land use
categories.
The following was discussed:
·
The proposed land
use categories are a significant change from those currently in use.
·
Each town in the
valley has significantly different land use concerns.
·
The proposed land
use categories will be review by county legal and Comprehensive Planning
Director.
·
The TAB and PC
will have 30 days to review the proposed land use categories prior to making
recommendations.
·
Some Community
Planning Working Group members do not agree with the land use categories as
presented.
·
The working group
members were asked their opinion on individual parts as they were proposed.
·
The working group
was not asked their opinion on the entire package.
·
Some working
group members felt the solutions A or B were offered but solution C not
considered.
·
The two longest working
group discussions were on the RNP-1 and Arterial Edge Concept.
·
The advance
planning staff seems reluctant to better protect the RNP-1 areas.
Continue to
the
2. Discuss increasing the number of members on
the Enterprise TAB Sub-Committee on Traffic Mitigation in the RNP. (For possible action)
Increase the
number of members on the
Appoint
Benoit Brideau to the
Continue to
the