Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC
or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed
to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current
Planning desk or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out how to file an appeal.
Help in filling an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action
Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244 · 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note:
If you ctrl+click on the blue
underlined text it will take you to the detailed documents to
explain the agenda item.
PUBLIC
COMMENTS: NONE
REGULAR
BUSINESS
1.
Approve the Minutes for the meeting held on
2.
Approve the Agenda with any corrections, deletions or changes. APPROVED
1. Items on the agenda may be taken out of
order.
2. The Town Advisory Board may combine two or
more agenda items for consideration.
3. The Town Advisory Board may remove an item from
the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item at any time.
ANNOUNCEMENTS NONE
DISCUSSION
Comprehensive Planning Staff to receive the Town
Board’s comments on the Consolidated Land Use Categories.
A presentation was given by Advanced Planning staff
members Paul Doerr and Shane Ammerman
· The process of creating a new Community Development
Plan was begun about two years ago to replace the current land use process.
· In response to land use plans being used as a
pre-zoning instead of neighborhood planning and 8 different sets of land use
policies in use for the urban towns.
· The Community Development Working Group had advised
the staff on consolidated urban land use policies (
· The Community Development Working Group was make up of representatives from urban town boards and member
from the development community.
· The purpose is to make the Land Use Plan a planning
document and not a pre-zoning document.
· The Proposed Land Use Categories has 14 categories,
down from the previous 21.
· Public input on the plan begins now at the town
board level.
· The Proposed Land Use Categories and goals is scheduled to go to the Planning Commission on April 5 and
the Zoning Commission on May 4.
· The Proposed Land Use categories document is on the
http://www.clarkcountynv.gov/comprehensive-planning/land-use/Pages/default.aspx
NOTE: Scroll
down the Community Development page to hand-outs. The first three documents listed are the most
current. Also on this page is the Working Group agendas and minutes. The concept drafts are the initial document
the Working Group was given; they are not current.
The public and TAB discussion brought forward the
following concerns:
· A lack of clarity, understanding, and agreement of
how zoning categories fit into the proposed land use categories.
· The impression that the public has not been
adequately advised of the process.
· The public impression that the proposed land use
categories favor developers while not protecting existing residential
neighborhoods.
· The impression that the RNP will not be adequately
protected and buffered.
· People are more comfortable with and prefer the
existing land use plan and zoning categories relationship.
· No changes
are contemplated to the existing zoning categories.
· The proposed land use categories are applicable to
every urban town, however not all may be used some towns.
· Should eliminate the R-1 and R-T zoning categories
from the proposed Low Residential land use category and keep R-D and lessor zone districts.
· The arterial edge concept as portrayed in the
proposed land use categories does not work and was expanded well beyond the
original intended purpose: It should be an overlay with limited use.
· How will the proper zone district be selected in
proposed land use categories with multiple zone districts?
· In the multiple use proposed land use categories,
how is the use mix be maintained? This
concept in MUD has become high density residential with very little other uses.
· The entire package including goals, policies,
proposed land use categories and Title 30 changes should be reviewed as a whole
prior to any further approvals.
· A direction to staff by the
GENERAL
BUSINESS:
TAB to review input from their appointees to the
Community Plan Work Group and provide feedback regarding the process and final
staff recommendations. (for possible action)
ZONING
AGENDA:
1. VS-0883-15 – LEWIS INVESTMENT
CO NV, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
2. VS-0898-15 – LV ST. ROSE,
LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
3. WS-0894-15 – MATTEO’S, LLC:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to allow roof signs.
DESIGN
REVIEW for signage in conjunction with an
approved retail building on 1.6 acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment)
(AE-65) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
4. ZC-0836-15 – VISION QUEST DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC; ET AL:
(The applicant did not appear. Eight neighboring residents were in
attendance.)
Motion to:
REQUEST the Planning Commission return this application to the
Motion PASSED
USE
PERMIT for a
proposed mini-warehouse facility.
WAIVER OF
CONDITIONS of a Concept Plan (MP-0420-02)
requiring a 30-foot-wide buffer along the north, east, south, and portions of
the west boundaries of the northeast RNP area, the buffer will be designed in
accordance with the exhibit submitted at the Planning Commission meeting, and
shall be installed concurrently with the development of projects adjacent to
the RNP area.
DESIGN REVIEW for a proposed mini-warehouse facility in the Mountain’s
Edge Master Planned Community. Generally located on the
southwest corner of
The applicant did not appear or notify the TAB to hold
the item. The
5. TM-0222-15 - MOSAIC
Motion to:
APPROVE per staff conditions and revised plans presented.
Motion PASSED
TENTATIVE
The applicant has submitted new plans to the county that
meets the Public Works – Development Review conditions.
6. TM-0220-15 - LEWIS INVESTMENT CO NV, LLC,
ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
7. TM-0224-15 - WIENER 1989
TRUST, ET AL:
APPROVED per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
8. TM-0225-15 - D.R. HORTON:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
TENTATIVE
9. VS-0892-15 - LEWIS INVESTMENT
CO NV, LLC, ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
10. VS-0900-15 - MOSAIC
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
11. VS-0905-15 - WIENER 1989 TRUST, ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
VACATE
12. UC-0531-10 (WC-0179-15) - EVANS, KEITH A.:
Motion to:
APPROVE per staff conditions and,
ADD a Current Planning condition:
Motion PASSED
WAIVER
OF CONDITIONS of a use
permit requiring that the applicant shall build an enclosure, the structural
soundness of which shall be approved by the Clark County Building Department to
house an adult giraffe, the enclosure shall satisfy the U.S. Department of
Agriculture concerns regarding the appropriate manner for protecting a giraffe
from weather related elements, the enclosure shall have 4 walls and a roof and
shall be completed within 3 months of the issuance of building permits for the
structure, but in no event shall the structure be completed later than January
1, 2016 in conjunction with a recreational facility (zoo) with accessory
commercial uses, exotic animal compound, and an existing single family
residence on 6.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone. Generally located on the southwest corner of Bermuda Road and
Bruner Avenue within Enterprise. SS/jt/ml (For possible
action) 02/17/16
The applicant’s progress is hindered in the bureaucratic
maze which has slowed the progress of the relatively simple project. The approvals have been delayed at every step
of the project. The TAB recommends the
applicant have until the end of the year to navigate through the maze and
finish the project.
Motion to:
APPROVE per staff conditions and,
ADD a Public Works – Development Review condition:
·
All pole mounted
lighting on Bermuda should be fully shielded.
Motion PASSED
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to allow
modifications from standard drawings for cross gutters and driveway geometrics.
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following:
1) a proposed single family
residential development; and
2) increased finished grade
on
42.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the west side of Bermuda Road, 330 feet south
of Erie Avenue within Enterprise. SS/pb/ml (For
possible action) 02/17/16
Bermuda Rd. forms the eastern RNP boundary. The
14. ZC-0891-15 – LEWIS INVESTMENT CO NV, LLC,
ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
DESIGN REVIEWS for the following:
1) a proposed single family
residential development; and
2) increased finished grade on 10.8
acres.
Generally located on the
north side of Serene Avenue (alignment), west of Conquistador Street
(alignment) and 200 feet east of Hualapai Way within Enterprise (description on file). SB/dg/ml (For possible action) 02/17/16
15. ZC-0899-15 – MOSAIC
APPROVED
per staff conditions
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
proposed single family residential development.
Generally located on the
north side of Gomer Road and the west side of
Chieftain Street within Enterprise (description on file). SB/al/ml (For possible action) 02/17/16
16. ZC-0904-15 – WIENER 1989 TRUST, ET AL:
APPROVED
per staff conditions
DESIGN
REVIEW for a
proposed single family residential development.
Generally located on the
east side of Grand Canyon Drive (alignment) and the south side of Richmar Avenue (alignment) within Enterprise
(description on file). SB/dg/ml
(For possible action) 02/17/16
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
Comments by a group of eight neighbors in the Mountains Edge
RNP:
• They want their buffer
zone preserved around the entire RNP.
• Do not want the
neighboring property to be allowed C-1.
• Want to be protected
from neighboring fugitive lighting.
• Concerned about
traffic.
• Concerned about design
of walls along equestrian trail.
ADJOURNMENT:
The statements, opinions and observations
expressed in this document are solely those of the author. The opinions stated in this document are not
the official position of any government board, organization or group. The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission
results are reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This
document may be freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s
content is not altered. Additional
comments maybe added. Additional
comments must be clearly attributed to the author of those comments and
published or reproduced with the document.
The additional comments author’s affiliation with any government board,
organization or group must be clearly identified. This attribution statement must accompany any
distribution of this document.
David
D. Chestnut, Sr.