Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
ZONING AGENDA:
1. VS-0082-16
– cougar-jones investments, llc:
VACATE
APPROVE per staff conditions
2. VS-0091-16
– diamond placid, llc:
VACATE
APPROVE per staff conditions
3. DR-0097-16 – DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW, LLC:
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the following: 1) a proposed single family
residential development; and 2) increased finished grade on
approximately 7.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I)
Zone. Generally located on the southeast
corner of
HELD per prior request of the applicant, to
the
4. ZC-0737-12
(ET-0014-16) – sunset jones, llc:
DESIGN REVIEW for
an expansion to an existing shopping center including retail pad sites on 2.4
acres. Generally located on the west
side of
APPROVE per staff conditions
5. TM-0122-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
AMENDED HOLDOVER TENTATIVE
HELD to the
Some of the
neighbors present had not seen the revised plans and were asking many questions
on individual lots that should have been answered in the neighborhood
meeting. The TAB and the applicant
agreed that an additional neighborhood meeting was necessary to fully inform
the neighbors.
6. TM-0017-16
- LEWIS INVESTMENT CO. OF
TENTATIVE
APPROVE per staff conditions
7. TM-0020-16
– DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW, LLC:
TENTATIVE
HELD per prior request of the applicant, to
the
8. VS-0409-15
– zak mak, llc, et al:
AMENDED
HOLDOVER VACATE
HELD to the
Some of
the neighbors present had not seen the revised plans and were asking many
questions on individual lots that should have been answered in the neighborhood
meeting. The TAB and the applicant
agreed that an additional neighborhood meeting was necessary to fully inform
the neighbors.
9. VS-0089-16
- LEWIS INVESTMENT CO. OF
VACATE
APPROVE per staff conditions
10. VS-0096-16
– DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW, LLC:
VACATE
HELD per prior request of the applicant, to
the
11. UC-0797-15
(WC-0019-16) – southern
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS
of a use permit requiring the applicant to provide a 10 foot wide landscape
area with 1 row of trees planted generally 20 feet apart, shrubs and
groundcover to be planted to cover more than 50% of the landscape area along
the north property line on the south side of the drainage easement in
conjunction with an approved place of worship on 5.0 acres in an R-E (Rural
Estates Residential) Zone. Generally
located on the south side of
APPROVE per staff “if approved” conditions
The
applicant originally had the county required landscape buffer along
This is
another example of how the drainage study modifies approved plans. The result is Title 30 standards that were
met in the public hearings are modified after the fact. Had the drainage study been accomplished with
the original application the project design could have been be modified and
Title standards met.
12. WS-0408-15
– ZAK MAK, LLC, ET AL:
AMENDED HOLDOVER WAIVERS OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) reduced lot area
(previously not notified); 2) allow single family residential lots to
front a collector street (previously not notified); and 3) off-site
improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalks, streetlights, and partial paving)
(previously not notified).
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) a single family residential development; and 2)
increased finished grade (previously not notified) on 37.5 acres in an R-E
(Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone.
Generally located on the east and west sides of
HELD to the March 30, 2016 TAB per agreement
of the applicant to hold final neighborhood meeting.
Some of
the neighbors present had not seen the revised plans and were asking many
questions on individual lots that should have been answered in the neighborhood
meeting. The TAB and the applicant
agreed that an additional neighborhood meeting was necessary to fully inform
the neighbors.
13. WS-0071-16
– D.R. HORTON, INC:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1) reduced setbacks; and 2)
increased wall heights.
DESIGN REVIEW for
revised home models in conjunction with an approved single family residential
development on 11.7 acres in an R-D (Suburban Estates Residential) Zone and an
R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone.
Generally located on the north and south sides of Haleh Avenue, 300 feet
west of Dean Martin Drive within Enterprise.
SB/dg/ml (For possible action) 04/06/16 BCC
HELD per prior request of the applicant, to
the 3-30-16 TAB meeting and the 4-20-16 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
14. WS-0075-16
– CRAIG S. & JILL MICHAEL:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1) the requirement of public water
connection; and 2) full off-site improvements in conjunction with a
proposed minor residential subdivision on 3.2 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally
located on the southeast corner of Arville Street and Maulding Avenue within
Enterprise. SS/mk/ml (For possible
action) 04/06/16 BCC
APPROVE per staff “if approved: conditions
The
applicant has water rights for their wells and should be allowed to exercise
those rights.
The TAB
recommendation is Arville St. remain in its current configuration. The TAB is concerned with the traffic
patterns in this RNP. The current reduced pavement width is a traffic
mitigation measure for the RNP. If
Arville St. off-sites are built out, it may become an alternate route for large
trucks from the warehouse area to the east.
This is not a desired outcome.
15. ZC-0088-16
– LEWIS INVESTMENT CO. OF NEVADA, LLC:
ZONE CHANGE to
reclassify 10.4 acres from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) Zone to R-2 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone.
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) a proposed single family residential development; and 2)
increased finished grade. Generally
located on the north side of Gomer Road (alignment) and the east side of
Conquistador Street (alignment) within Enterprise (description on file). SB/dg/ml (For possible action) 04/06/16 BCC
APPROVE per staff conditions and,
ADD Current Planning condition:
·
Design
Review as a Public Hearing for significant changes to plan;
ADD Public Works – Development Review
condition:
·
All
pole mounted lighting to be fully shielded;
The following items were discussed by the TAB:
·
The density
approaching the Red Rock Overlay is too great.
·
This project reduces
the potential density by 6 units per acre.
·
All the proposed
projects in the area will not be adequately served by parks, schools and
commercial uses.
·
Too many lots are
under 4000 sq. ft.
·
Lewis Investment Co
will not be the ultimate builder.
·
Pedestrian
circulation is poor.
The TAB recommended any significant change to plans
presented be subject to a public Design Review because the ultimate builder is
not known.
The area is approaching the Red Rock Design overlay, as
such should have all pole mounted lighting to be fully shielded.
16. ZC-0103-16
– COUNTY OF CLARK (AVIATION):
ZONE CHANGE to
reclassify 1.3 acres from C-P (Office & Professional) (AE-60) Zone to M-D
(Designed Manufacturing) (AE-60) Zone for a distribution center.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
distribution center on 19.5 acres in an M-D (Designed Manufacturing) (AE-60)
Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District.
Generally located on the northwest corner of Windmill Lane and Valley
View Boulevard within Enterprise (description on file). SS/al/ml
(For possible action) 04/06/16 BCC
APPROVE Zone Change
APPROVE Design Review with the following
modification:
·
The
northeast exit be moved south;
ADD Public Works – Development Review
conditions:
·
Valley
View not to be extended further than that northeast exit on the property and to
have barriers on the east side of the street to prevent traffic going north;
·
The
exit on Valley View to be built to allow right out only
Otherwise, per staff conditions
The proposed project is a continuation of the
distribution facility developed to the west.
The design will be similar and cross access will be provided. The number of tenants has not been determined
at this time.
The RNP residents are seriously concerned with the heavy
truck traffic north bound on Valley View Blvd. The 2001 zone change specified
that no truck traffic would be allowed to go north on Valley View Blvd. into
the RNP. The staff has included the
following condition: “No truck traffic to travel north of site on Valley View
Boulevard”. The TAB believes this will
be a very difficult condition to enforce, if it can be enforced at all.
The TAB opinion is a physical barrier and exit design are
required to enforce the no truck traffic to go north on Valley View Blvd.
The project will have two entrance/exits on Valley View
Blvd. One entrance is on the northeast
corner adjacent to Mesa Verde Ln. If
this entrance/exit is build it will provide easy access to Valley View Blvd.
north of the site. The TAB recommends
this entrance/exit be moved south and area between the northern entrance/exit
to Mesa Verde Ln. not be developed.
Additionally, barriers should be put into place to prevent vehicles
going north on the undeveloped portion of Valley View Blvd.
The TAB also recommends the exits along Valley View Blvd.
be developed for right-out channelization.
The intent is to physically direct traffic south on Valley View Blvd.
The applicant requested the staff condition for a design
review for lighting and signage be modified to only cover free standing
signs. This condition would not have
taken wall mounted and other signs and lighting into account. Given the close proximity of the RNP the TAB
recommendation is the staff condition for a lighting and signage not be
changed.
GENERAL BUSINESS:
Receive a RNP Traffic Sub-Committee report and recommend additional action. (for possible action)
TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT March
9, 2016
The Enterprise Traffic Committee
requests the Enterprise TAB allow two committee members to discussed the
following with Public Works.
Mitigate potential traffic
problems at Pebble and Torrey Pines and Pebble and El Camino due to charter
school and church traffic within or adjacent to RNP-1.
Speed limits that are not
consistent along an arterial or collector.
What are traffic mitigation
measures that are recommended by Public Works that can be employed in the RNP-1
areas?
·
What
is the process to have them installed?
What is the current status of
improvement plans for arterials?
·
Decatur
Blvd south of Warm Springs
·
Jones
Blvd south of Blue Diamond Rd.
o
including
the interchange at Blue Diamond Rd.
o
realignment
of Oleta Ave.
·
Rainbow
Blvd. south of Blue Diamond Rd.
·
Buffalo
south of Warm Springs to Blue Diamond Rd.
·
Durango
Dr./Blue Diamond Rd. intersection
·
Cactus
Ave. adjacent to regional park.
·
Valley
View Blvd. north of Blue Diamond Rd.
·
Warm
Springs Rd. between Decatur Blvd. to Dean Martin Dr.
What is the status of the master
transportation map revisions?
·
What
roads will be effected in Enterprise?
Insulation of LED street lights?
Traffic Committee to forward report to and schedule
meeting with Public Works for discussion.
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in
this document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be
freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not
altered. Additional comments maybe
added. Additional comments must be
clearly attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced
with the document. The additional
comments author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group
must be clearly identified. This
attribution statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.