Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
ANNOUNCMENTS
1. Public artwork project, "
2. May is Residential Amnesty Month in
GENERAL BUSINESS:
Discuss possible changes to Title 30 for Agriculture Livestock- Medium and Large animals to make regulations more clear and establish new formulas for calculating the total number of animals. (For possible action)
Sami Real provided an update on changes to
regulations made last year. Discussion
included calculations of medium and large animals as well as square footage and
turnout requirements. ETAB recommended
consistency in code for all animals.
No action
taken.
ZONING AGENDA:
1.
ZC-0151-13 (WC-0049-16) Richmond american
homes of nevada, Inc:
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS of a zone change requiring that the
developer must obtain a right-of-way grant from the Bureau of Land Management
for the proposed access road off Ford Avenue and for Cougar Avenue, including
an approved turn around at the west end of Cougar Avenue in conjunction with a
single family residential development on 21.5 acres in an RUD (Residential
Urban Density) Zone. Generally
located on the north side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
The two companion items for this application were heard
by the TAB on
2.
UC-0203-16 SANDS PLAZA, LLC:
USE PERMIT to allow the sale of packaged liquor in
conjunction with a convenience store within an existing commercial
center on a portion of 1.0 acre in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone. Generally located on the
north side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
3.
VS-0202-16
Rainsprings, llc:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions and,
AMEND
Public Works Development Review condition #1 to read:
·
Vacation to be recordable prior to bond
release;
The
Applicant negotiated a change to Public Works bullet #1. The TAB recommendation reflects the result of
the negotiations as stated by the applicant.
4.
WS-0207-16 PRENTICE GREENE PROPERTIES,
LLC:
WAIVER OF
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce
parking.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a second floor addition and other modifications to an existing office/warehouse building on 0.3
acres in an M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zone.
Generally located on the south side of
DENY
The
TAB recommendation is to deny this application.
Recent
The
TAB generally supports business opportunities in
The
TAB considered a condition that the parking waiver apply
only to this applicant. The staff
advised the TAB, this type of waiver is difficult to enforce and may not be
legally defendable.
The
12 bicycle slots in this location will not have a significant effect on the
actual parking required.
This
is a case where the minimum parking requirement has been met. However, this complex does not have
sufficient parking for the actual uses.
Title 30 requires the property owner to provide adequate parking ;not just the minimum standard.
The are several
commercial/industrial complexes in
5.
DR-0205-16 MAJESTIC
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed manmade decorative water feature in conjunction with an existing
resort hotel (Silverton) on 78.6 acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment)
Zone and an H-1 (Limited Resort and Apartment) (AE-60) Zone in the MUD-2
Overlay District. Generally
located on the southeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
6.
DR-0206-16 MAJESTIC
DESIGN REVIEW for
proposed restaurants with drive thru service and retail buildings within an
approved shopping center on a portion of 13.4 acres in an H-1 (Limited Resort
and Apartment) (AE-60) Zone in the MUD-2 Overlay District. Generally located on the
southwest corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
7.
DR-0208-16
DESIGN REVIEW for a proposed vehicle maintenance
building (smog check) within an existing shopping center on a portion of 0.7
acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the
east side of
Applicant
did not appear nor advise the TAB of intentions.
HOLD to the
8.
DR-0212-16 MERES INC 2015, LLC:
DESIGN REVIEW for a
proposed office warehouse development on 1.3 acres in an M-D (Designed
Manufacturing) Zone. Generally
located on the northeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions and,
ADD
a Current Planning condition:
·
Design Review as a public hearing for lighting
and signage;
Lighting and signage were not covered in this
application. The TAB has consistently
recommended a public hearing for lighting and signage. This is the first project in the area that
will set the standard for the area.
9.
UC-0525-14 (ET-0011-16) mfe, inc:
USE PERMITS FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME to commence the
following: 1) vehicle wash; 2) gasoline station; and 3) reduce separation from a gasoline
station to a residential use in conjunction with an approved shopping center
and convenience store.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS to reduce the driveway
separation.
DESIGN REVIEW for a shopping center including 2 pad sites on
3.8 acres in a C-1 (Local Business) Zone.
Generally located on the west side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions and,
ADD
Current Planning conditions:
·
Design review as a public hearing for
lighting and signage;
·
Establish perpetual cross access with
property to the west if compatible commercial uses are established to the west;
·
Design review as a public hearing for
significant changes to plans;
The TAB has previously recommended these additional
conditions. These conditions were not
included by the
10.
TM-0042-16
TENTATIVE
HELD by applicant prior to meeting to May 11, 2016.
11.
WS-0213-16
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
increased wall height; and 2) full off-site improvements (partial
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights) along a collector street (
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) single family
residential subdivision; and 2)
increase the finish grade on a 32.5 acre portion of an overall 116.0 acres in
an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
HELD by applicant prior to meeting to May 11, 2016.
12. WS-0162-16 NCW
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to allow a future
wall sign on a parapet wall that is not integral to the overall building
design.
DESIGN REVIEW for a
vehicle wash on 1.0 acre in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone in the MUD-4 Overlay District. Generally located on the east side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Waiver
of Development Standards DENY
Design
Review APPROVE
with the parapet removed
ADD
Current Planning condition:
·
Design review as a public hearing for
lighting and signage;
The car wash is an automated facility with 2 or 3
employees. The 10 parking places
provided should be adequate for the facility.
The TAB agrees with the staff assessment on the parapet
wall. It is too high and not appropriate
for the neighborhood.
Lighting and signage were not covered in this
application. The TAB has consistently
recommended a public hearing for lighting and signage. The Design Review is necessary to ensure the
lighting and signage are appropriate for the
neighborhood.
13 TM-0028-16 - ROOHANI, KHUSROW:
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
APPROVE
per staff and conditions added to application WS-0146-16
·
Minimize fill as much as possible while
accomplishing drainage on the lot;
·
Six foot wall not to extend past the side of
the house along
·
Exterior wall height adjacent to
right-of-way to be measured from center line of road height;
See
WS-0146-16 for comments
14 VS-0147-16 - ROOHANI, KHUSROW:
VACATE
PREVIOUS ACTION
APPROVE
per staff conditions
15 WS-0146-16 ROOHANI, KHUSROW:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1) reduced gross lot
area; 2) increased wall height; and 3) full off-site improvements (partial
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights).
DESIGN
REVIEW for a single family residential
development on 5.0 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I)
Zone. Generally
located on the north side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Waiver
of Development Standards #1 & #2 WITHDRAWN
by applicant
Waiver
of Development Standards #3 APPROVE
Design
Review APPROVE
ADD
Current Planning conditions:
·
Minimize fill as much as possible while accomplishing
drainage on the lot;
·
Six foot wall not to extend past the side of
the house along
·
Exterior wall height adjacent to right-of-way
to be measured from center line of road height;
The applicant has an excellent project redesign. The new design is a better fit for the
neighborhood and should require less grading.
The new design allowed the applicant to withdraw Waiver of Development
Standards #s 1 and 2.
The residents are concerned with several items.
·
The redundant wall
placement along the western boundary.
·
Rural road standards
to applied to Warbonnet way.
·
How the drainage
will be accomplished?
·
The property
grading.
The applicant apparently has not done a preliminary
drainage and grading plan and as a result could not answer questions on those
items: their reply was that it would be taken care of later. The TAB recommended the applicant and the
neighbors stay in close contact to coordinate these items.
The TAB was concerned with three items. In previous applications where
the wall height waiver was withdrawn. The actual wall height was not lower
than originally planned. The wall was
placed on top of a berm to make up for the height
that would have been allowed with a waiver.
This technically meets Title 30 codes but does not enhance the
neighborhood. The net effect is a canyon like look to the street. The canyon look is not appropriated for a
RNP-1. The TAB added a recommendation
that the wall heights be measure from the
The applicant stated the redundant wall needs to be 4 or
18 inches. The Title 30 standard is 4 or
30 inches.
The second item is the cul-de-sac sight lines and canyon
wall effect along
The third item is how each lot/pad is graded. Will the entire lot be filled to level or
just the house pad be elevated with grading for
drainage? The TAB has observed the
leveling of the entire project or lot, as opposed to stair step grading on each
house lot/pad. Such grading results in
excessive fill and walls that are higher than
necessary. The TAB could not obtain an
answer to how the lots would be graded and where the drainage would be located. Other developers have presented the
preliminary grading and drainage plans for the residents and TAB to evaluate.
16 DR-0097-16
DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW, LLC:
DESIGN
REVIEWS for the
following: 1) a proposed single
family residential development; and 2)
increased finished grade on approximately 7.5 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the southeast corner of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
This application was withdrawn w/o prejudice
at the
17 TM-0020-16 DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW,
LLC:
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
This
application was withdrawn w/o prejudice at the
18 VS-0096-16 DP 20130702 VALLEY VIEW,
LLC:
VACATE
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
This
application was withdrawn w/o prejudice at the
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in
this document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be
freely distributed and reproduced as long as the authors content is not
altered. Additional comments maybe added. Additional comments must be clearly
attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the
document. The additional comments
authors affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be
clearly identified. This attribution
statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.