Results
The Zoning Agenda items will be heard by the PC or
The PC decisions/recommendations may be appealed to the
An appeal may be made in person at the Current Planning desk
or by fax (702-455-3271). Call Current Planning (455-4314) to find out
how to file an appeal. Help in filling
an appeal may be obtained from the Southwest Action Network (SWAN). You can contact SWAN at:
702-837-0244
· 702-837-0255 (fax)
email: swan@lvswan.org
Note: If you ctrl+click on the blue underlined text
it will take you to the detailed documents to explain the agenda item.
ANNOUNCMENTS
Neighborhood meeting:
ZONING AGENDA:
1.
DR-0229-16 – D.R. HORTON, INC:
DESIGN REVIEW
for a proposed recreational area (community pool and amenities) in conjunction
with a partially developed single family residential development on a 0.2 acre
portion of 40.0 acres in an R-2 (Medium Density Residential) Zone in the MUD-1
Overlay District. Generally
located on the southeast corner of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
This is an excellent addition
to the subdivision. The applicant has
removed 2 house lots to give the neighborhood recreational facilities that are
not available in the area.
2.
SC-0235-16
– UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS, ET AL:
STREET NAME
APPROVE
per staff “if approved” conditions and,
Request
#2 withdrawn by applicant;
The TAB opinion is the actual
street number should be coordinated between the address Staff and the
applicant.
3.
VS-0237-16 – jones 215, llc:
VACATE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
4.
UC-0111-89
(WC-0047-16) – ENSWORTH &
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS: of a use permit for an off-premise sign
requiring applicant to have the sign removed if property otherwise
develops. Generally
located on the east side of I-15 and 300 feet south of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
The condition was a result of an attempt to beautify the
interstate roads in the late 1980s. The
staff position is that it is too early to remove the condition until the
property is developed. Given the size of
the property and the location it is not likely it will be developed in the near
future.
The TAB recommends the waiver be removed. One TAB member agreed with the staff position
to keep the waiver in place.
5.
WS-0225-16
– WILLIAMS, TRISTAN E & DUONG, LAUREN N:
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for the following: 1) allow
alternative screening (decorative block wall) in the front yard; and 2)
reduced setback from a right-of-way in conjunction with an existing single
family residence on 1.2 acres in
an R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the west side of
APPROVE
per staff conditions
6.
TM-0053-16
– D.R. HORTON, INC:
TENTATIVE
APPROVE
per staff conditions
The applicant presented an
attractive design for the decorative wall.
Only the pillars are 8 ft. high.
The upper portion of the wall uses wrought iron to provide the increased
height.
7.
UC-0254-16 – ADF-BUFFALO, LLC:
USE PERMITS for the following: 1) reduce the separation of a
convenience store from a residential use; 2) reduce the setback of a
gasoline station from a residential use; and 3) reduce the setback of a
vehicle wash facility (automobile) from a residential use.
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for modified street
standards.
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) convenience store; 2)
gasoline station; and 3) vehicle
wash facility on a portion of 5.1 acres in a C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone. Generally located
on the southeast corner of
HOLD
to
8.
WS-0253-16 – D.R. HORTON, INC:
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS to reduce front
setback.
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) single family
residential development; and 2)
increase the finish grade on 17.1 acres in an R-E (Rural Estates Residential)
(RNP-I) Zone. Generally
located on the north and south sides of
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DENY for lots 5, 6, 7, 14,
15, 16 only
DESIGN
REVIEW APPROVE
ADD
a Current Planning condition:
·
Homes be restricted to one story only
The applicant has worked
closely with the neighbors to produce an RNP compatible design. The design components are:
· The lots are terraced and there
is an attempt to closely match the finished height of adjoining properties.
·
· The walls entering the
cul-de-sacs will decrease in height from side of the home to the pavement to
present an open look.
· All single story models. (applicant condition).
The TAB recommendation is the
Waiver of Development Standards apply only to the lots
that front on a cul-de-sac. The
cul-de-sac were listed as common elements on the
Tentative Map which requires the setback be taken from the pavement edge not
the centerline. The cul-de-sac will be maintained by the residents through a
road maintenance agreement. The
cul-de-sac roads are essentially private roads and should be treated that way.
Setbacks along public roads
should not be reduced.
9.
WS-0255-16 –
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the
following: 1) waive trash
enclosure requirements; 2) waive landscaping requirements; 3)
increase wall height; 4) permit a large parking area where parking areas
shall be designed as a series of smaller connected parking courts; 5)
waive requirements for cross access and shared parking easements; 6)
waive requirements for enhanced paving; 7) permit tandem parking spaces
where not permitted; and 8) permit an alternative parking layout.
WAIVERS OF CONDITIONS of a zone change (ZC-2006-03) for the
following: 1) right-of-way
dedication to include 30 feet for Mann Street, and 40 feet for Badura Avenue; and 2) drainage and traffic studies
and compliance.
DESIGN
REVIEW for a parking lot including parallel parking spaces on 5.0 acres
in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone in the
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS #1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, 8 APPROVE
WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS #6 DENY
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS #1
APPROVE
Waiver of right-of-way dedication for 30 feet for Mann Street
Applicant
WITHDRAWS Waiver of right-of-way dedication for 40 feet for
WAIVER OF CONDITIONS #2
Applicant
WITHDRAWS Waiver request for drainage
APPROVE
Waiver for traffic studies and compliance
DESIGN
REVIEW APPROVE
ADD
Current Planning conditions:
·
Design Review as a Public Hearing for
lighting and signage;
·
West property line to have decorative wall
or fence (not chain-link);
This was a difficult
application for two reasons. First, the
property is subject to the
The TAB examined this project
as it fits into the area development.
The items considered were:
· The area is developing as auto
dealerships and related services.
· This an excellent area for auto
dealerships.
o
Residential has been limited to south of
o
Residential developments south of
· There is a need for test drive
roads in non-residential areas.
· The dedication of
· Many of the
· Lighting and signage were not
presented in this application.
· The landscaping and wall design
are excellent along
· Chain link fences are not
suitable for permanent commercial locations.
· The TAB agrees with the
applicant that the western decorative wall/fence should be a combination of
block and wrought iron.
· The use of wrought iron reduces
the heat retention of a block wall.
10.
TM-0042-16
–
TENTATIVE
PREVIOUS ACTION
HELD
to
11.
WS-0213-16 –
WAIVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for the following: 1)
increased wall height; and 2) full off-site improvements (partial
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetlights) along a collector street (
DESIGN REVIEWS for
the following: 1) single family
residential subdivision; and 2)
increase the finish grade on a 32.5 acre portion of an overall 116.0 acres in
an R-E (Rural Estates Residential) (RNP-I) Zone. Generally located on the north side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
HELD to
12.
DR-0208-16 –
DESIGN REVIEW for a proposed vehicle maintenance
building (smog check) within an existing shopping center on a portion of 0.7
acres in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zone. Generally located on the
east side of
PREVIOUS ACTION
Enterprise TAB
APPROVE
per staff conditions
GENERAL BUSINESS:
NONE
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
No
discussion, action, or vote may be taken upon a matter raised under this item
of the agenda until the matter itself has been specifically included on a
future agenda. Comments will be limited to three minutes. Please step to the
front of the room to address the Board, clearly state your name and address and
please spell your last name for the record. If
any member of the Board wishes to extend the length of a presentation this will
be done by the Chair or the Board by majority vote.
Cheryl
Wilson questioned whether signage is as necessary now as it has been in the
past, given technology most people use when seeking directions (i.e. mobile
apps,
Dave
Chestnut questioned whether freestanding signs are appropriate on smaller
commercial developments.
Chairman
Frank Kapriva requested a discussion item regarding
signage on the
The statements, opinions and observations expressed in
this document are solely those of the author.
The opinions stated in this document are not the official position of
any government board, organization or group.
The project descriptions, ordinances board/commission results are
reproduced from publicly available Clark County Records. This document may be
freely distributed and reproduced as long as the author’s content is not
altered. Additional comments maybe added. Additional comments must be clearly
attributed to the author of those comments and published or reproduced with the
document. The additional comments
author’s affiliation with any government board, organization or group must be
clearly identified. This attribution
statement must accompany any distribution of this document.
David D. Chestnut, Sr.